Castellucci Clara, Braun Julia, Said Sadiq, Roche Tadzio Raoul, Nöthiger Christoph B, Spahn Donat R, Tscholl David W, Akbas Samira
Institute of Anesthesiology, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Epidemiology, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, 8001 Zurich, Switzerland.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 May 19;12(5):1269. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12051269.
As the interpretation of viscoelastic coagulation test results remains challenging, we created Visual Clot, an animated blood clot aiming to facilitate raw rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) parameters. This study investigated anesthesia personnel’s cognitive processing in managing simulated bleeding scenarios using eye-tracking technology. This multicenter, international, computer-based study across five large, central European hospitals included 35 participants with minimal to no prior experience interpreting viscoelastic test results. Using eye-tracking technology and an iPad tagged with quick response codes, we defined the time to treatment decision and the time on screen surface in seconds of correctly solved scenarios as our outcomes. The median time to treatment decision was 52 s for Visual Clot and 205 s for ROTEM (p < 0.0001). The probability of solving the scenario correctly was more than 8 times higher when using Visual Clot than when using ROTEM (Hazard ratio [HR] 8.54, 95% CI from 6.5 to 11.21; p < 0.0001). Out of 194 correctly answered scenarios of participants with the eye-tracker, 154 (79.4%) were solved with Visual Clot and 40 (20.6%) with ROTEM. Participants spent on average 30 s less looking at the screen surface with Visual Clot compared to ROTEM (Coefficient −30.74 s, 95% CI from −39.27 to −22.27; p < 0.0001). For a comparison of the two modalities in terms of information transfer, we calculated the percentage of time on the screen surface of the overall time to treatment decision, which with Visual Clot was 14 percentage points shorter than with ROTEM (Coefficient −14.55, 95% CI from −20.05 to −9.12; p < 0.0001). Visual Clot seems to improve perception and detection of coagulopathies and leads to earlier initiation of the appropriate treatment. In a high-pressure working environment such as the operating and the resuscitation room, correct and timely decisions regarding bleeding management may have a relevant impact on patients’ outcomes.
由于对粘弹性凝血试验结果的解读仍然具有挑战性,我们创建了“可视化凝块”,这是一个动画血凝块,旨在辅助解读旋转血栓弹力图(ROTEM)的原始参数。本研究使用眼动追踪技术调查了麻醉人员在处理模拟出血场景时的认知过程。这项多中心、国际性、基于计算机的研究在欧洲中部的五家大型医院开展,纳入了35名此前对粘弹性试验结果解读经验极少或全无的参与者。我们使用眼动追踪技术以及贴有二维码的iPad,将做出治疗决策的时间以及正确解决模拟场景时在屏幕表面停留的时间(以秒为单位)作为研究结果。对于“可视化凝块”,做出治疗决策的中位时间为52秒,而对于ROTEM则为205秒(p < 0.0001)。使用“可视化凝块”正确解决模拟场景的概率比使用ROTEM时高出8倍多(风险比[HR] 8.54,95%置信区间为6.5至11.21;p < 0.0001)。在使用眼动追踪仪的参与者正确回答的194个模拟场景中,154个(79.4%)通过“可视化凝块”解决,40个(20.6%)通过ROTEM解决。与ROTEM相比,参与者使用“可视化凝块”时在屏幕表面停留的平均时间少30秒(系数为−30.74秒,95%置信区间为−39.27至−22.27;p < 0.0001)。为了比较两种模式在信息传递方面的情况,我们计算了在屏幕表面停留的时间占做出治疗决策总时间的百分比,使用“可视化凝块”时比使用ROTEM时短14个百分点(系数为−14.55,95%置信区间为−20.05至−9.12;p < 0.0001)。“可视化凝块”似乎能改善对凝血功能障碍的感知和检测,并能更早地开始进行适当治疗。在手术室和复苏室等高压工作环境中,关于出血管理的正确及时决策可能会对患者的预后产生重大影响。