Gray P
Psychoanal Q. 1987 Jan;56(1):130-54.
As a result of Freud's ambiguity (and that of later analysts) regarding the nature of the superego and how to treat it in clinical practice, it has taken many years and many theoreticians to move from Freud's predilection to use it for purposes of "suggestion" in overcoming resistance, toward the concept of the superego as part of the ego's hierarchically mobilized defensive activities in the analytical process. Although much ambiguity persists, an attempt is made here to reduce it so that analytical technique may move forward to allow the superego to be analyzed as an unconscious conflict solution.
由于弗洛伊德（以及后来的分析师）在超我的本质以及在临床实践中如何对待超我这两方面存在模糊性，从弗洛伊德倾向于在克服阻抗时将其用于“暗示”目的，发展到将超我视为分析过程中自我分层动员的防御活动的一部分这一概念，历经了许多年，也经过了许多理论家的努力。尽管许多模糊性仍然存在，但本文试图减少这种模糊性，以便分析技术能够向前发展，从而可以将超我作为一种无意识冲突解决方案来进行分析。
