• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种植体修复前在嵴顶和嵴下水平植入的内锥连接种植体的边缘骨丢失:一项随机临床研究

Marginal Bone Loss in Internal Conical Connection Implants Placed at the Crestal and Subcrestal Levels before Prosthetic Loading: A Randomized Clinical Study.

作者信息

Palacios-Garzón Natalia, Mauri-Obradors Elisabeth, Ayuso-Montero Raúl, Velasco-Ortega Eugenio, Anglada-Cantarell José María, López-López José

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (Dentistry), University of Barcelona, 08907 L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.

Oral Health and Masticatory System Group, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, 08907 Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2022 May 23;15(10):3729. doi: 10.3390/ma15103729.

DOI:10.3390/ma15103729
PMID:35629754
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9145780/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

The vertical position concerning the bone in which the implants are placed has been related as one of the factors causing marginal bone loss. The objective of this study was to evaluate the bone loss that occurs before prosthetic loading around tapered internal connection (CIC) implants placed at the crestal (C) and subcrestal (S) levels.

METHOD

A randomized clinical trial (RCT) was carried out, with a sample size of 62 implants placed in 27 patients who underwent radiological controls on the day of placement, at one month, and at 4 months, and stability was measured by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) on three occasions.

RESULTS

Bone loss in implants C and S from the time of placement (T0) and the month after (T1) was not significant ( = 0.54) (C = 0.19 mm and S = 0.15 mm). The difference between one month (T1) and four months (T2) (C = 0.17 mm and S = 0.22 mm) was not significant either ( = 0.26). The difference between the day of placement (T0) and the third and last measurement (T2) was almost null ( = 0.94) (C = 0.35 mm and S = 0.36). The overall success rate of the implants was 97.8%. The stability of the implants measured with RFA went from 70.60 (T0) to 73.16 (T1) and 74.52 (T2).

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences were found in the bone loss for implants placed at the C and S levels. The millimeters of bone loss detected in both vertical positions did not have a significant impact on the stability of the implants.

摘要

未标注

种植体植入骨内的垂直位置被认为是导致边缘骨丢失的因素之一。本研究的目的是评估在牙嵴顶(C)和牙嵴顶以下(S)水平植入的锥形内部连接(CIC)种植体在修复体加载前发生的骨丢失情况。

方法

进行了一项随机临床试验(RCT),样本包括为27例患者植入的62颗种植体,在植入当天、1个月和4个月时进行影像学检查,并通过共振频率分析(RFA)在三个时间点测量稳定性。

结果

种植体C和S从植入时(T0)到植入后1个月(T1)的骨丢失不显著(P = 0.54)(C = 0.19毫米,S = 0.15毫米)。1个月(T1)和4个月(T2)之间的差异也不显著(P = 0.26)(C = 0.17毫米,S = 0.22毫米)。植入当天(T0)与第三次也是最后一次测量(T2)之间的差异几乎为零(P = 0.94)(C = 0.35毫米,S = 0.36毫米)。种植体的总体成功率为97.8%。用RFA测量的种植体稳定性从70.60(T0)提高到73.16(T1)和74.52(T2)。

结论

在C和S水平植入的种植体在骨丢失方面未发现显著差异。在两个垂直位置检测到的骨丢失毫米数对种植体的稳定性没有显著影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ac/9145780/ae262bfd2778/materials-15-03729-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ac/9145780/5f074e8b4d13/materials-15-03729-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ac/9145780/22a5c803d343/materials-15-03729-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ac/9145780/015ba4531992/materials-15-03729-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ac/9145780/456f7e75adbf/materials-15-03729-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ac/9145780/0411407ec5b3/materials-15-03729-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ac/9145780/ae262bfd2778/materials-15-03729-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ac/9145780/5f074e8b4d13/materials-15-03729-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ac/9145780/22a5c803d343/materials-15-03729-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ac/9145780/015ba4531992/materials-15-03729-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ac/9145780/456f7e75adbf/materials-15-03729-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ac/9145780/0411407ec5b3/materials-15-03729-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2ac/9145780/ae262bfd2778/materials-15-03729-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Marginal Bone Loss in Internal Conical Connection Implants Placed at the Crestal and Subcrestal Levels before Prosthetic Loading: A Randomized Clinical Study.种植体修复前在嵴顶和嵴下水平植入的内锥连接种植体的边缘骨丢失:一项随机临床研究
Materials (Basel). 2022 May 23;15(10):3729. doi: 10.3390/ma15103729.
2
The impact of subcrestal placement on short locking-taper implants placed in posterior maxilla and mandible: a retrospective evaluation on hard and soft tissues stability after 2 years of loading.牙槽嵴顶下植入对后牙区上颌骨和下颌骨短型锁定锥度种植体的影响:2年负载后软硬组织稳定性的回顾性评估
Minerva Stomatol. 2014 Nov-Dec;63(11-12):391-402.
3
Five Degree Internal Conical Connection and Marginal Bone Stability around Subcrestal Implants: A Retrospective Analysis.龈下种植体周围的五度内锥连接与边缘骨稳定性:一项回顾性分析。
Materials (Basel). 2020 Jul 13;13(14):3123. doi: 10.3390/ma13143123.
4
A Prospective Multicenter Study on Radiographic Crestal Bone Changes Around Dental Implants Placed at Crestal or Subcrestal Level: One-Year Findings.一项关于在牙槽嵴顶或牙槽嵴顶以下水平植入牙种植体周围牙槽嵴顶骨影像学变化的前瞻性多中心研究:一年期结果。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Jul/Aug;33(4):913-918. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6509.
5
Influence of placement depth and abutment connection pattern on bone remodeling around 1-stage implants: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.一期种植体植入深度和基台连接方式对种植体周围骨改建的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照临床试验
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Feb;27(2):e47-56. doi: 10.1111/clr.12527. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
6
Bone Loss in Implants Placed at Subcrestal and Crestal Level: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.种植于牙槽嵴顶以下和牙槽嵴顶水平的种植体骨吸收:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Materials (Basel). 2019 Jan 5;12(1):154. doi: 10.3390/ma12010154.
7
Effect of different implant placement depths on crestal bone levels and soft tissue behavior: A 5-year randomized clinical trial.不同种植体植入深度对种植体周骨水平和软组织行为的影响:一项为期 5 年的随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 Mar;31(3):282-293. doi: 10.1111/clr.13569. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
8
Does Apico-Coronal Implant Position Influence Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss? A 36-Month Follow-Up Randomized Clinical Trial.根尖-冠向种植体位置会影响种植体周围边缘骨吸收吗?一项36个月随访的随机临床试验。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Mar;77(3):515-527. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
9
Influence of placement depth on bone remodeling around tapered internal connection implant: a clinical and radiographic study in dogs.种植体锥形内连接颈部不同埋植深度对周围骨改建影响的临床及影像学研究。
J Periodontol. 2012 Sep;83(9):1164-71. doi: 10.1902/jop.2012.110617. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
10
Impact of crestal and subcrestal implant placement in peri-implant bone: A prospective comparative study.种植体嵴顶和嵴下植入对种植体周围骨组织的影响:一项前瞻性对照研究。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016 Jan 1;21(1):e103-10. doi: 10.4317/medoral.20747.

引用本文的文献

1
Crestal and Subcrestal Placement of Morse Cone Implant-Abutment Connection Implants: An In Vitro Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Study.莫氏锥度种植体-基台连接种植体的嵴顶和嵴下放置:一项体外有限元分析(FEA)研究。
Biomedicines. 2023 Nov 16;11(11):3077. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11113077.
2
Immediate Loading of Implants with Fixed Rehabilitations in Geriatric Edentulous Patients; Biological Complications.老年无牙颌患者种植体即刻负重固定修复;生物学并发症
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 16;12(20):6548. doi: 10.3390/jcm12206548.
3
Multicentre Prospective Study Analysing Relevant Factors Related to Marginal Bone Loss: A Two-Year Evolution.

本文引用的文献

1
Implant rehabilitation of edentulous jaws with predominantly monolithic zirconia compared to metal-acrylic prostheses: a 2-year retrospective clinical study.纯氧化锆与金属-丙烯酸酯义齿修复无牙颌:一项为期 2 年的回顾性临床研究。
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2021 Jul-Aug;35(4 Suppl. 1):99-112. doi: 10.23812/21-4supp1-9.
2
Clinical comparison between crestal and subcrestal dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.牙槽嵴顶种植体与牙槽嵴顶以下种植体的临床比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Mar;127(3):408-417. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.11.003. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
3
Bone Loss in Implants Placed at Subcrestal and Crestal Level: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
多中心前瞻性研究分析与边缘骨丢失相关的相关因素:两年进展情况
Dent J (Basel). 2023 Jul 31;11(8):185. doi: 10.3390/dj11080185.
4
How to Enhance Dental Implant Therapies and Definitive Restoration Outcomes to Reduce Complications and Improve Patient Well-Being.如何加强牙种植治疗及最终修复效果以减少并发症并改善患者健康状况。
Materials (Basel). 2023 May 15;16(10):3730. doi: 10.3390/ma16103730.
种植于牙槽嵴顶以下和牙槽嵴顶水平的种植体骨吸收:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Materials (Basel). 2019 Jan 5;12(1):154. doi: 10.3390/ma12010154.
4
Comparison of Marginal Bone Loss Between Implants with Internal and External Connections: A Systematic Review.内连接与外连接种植体边缘骨吸收的比较:一项系统评价
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 May/Jun;33(3):580-589. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6190.
5
Adapting the vertical position of implants with a conical connection in relation to soft tissue thickness prevents early implant surface exposure: A 2-year prospective intra-subject comparison.调整具有锥形连接的种植体在软组织厚度方面的垂直位置可预防种植体早期表面暴露:一项为期 2 年的前瞻性个体内比较研究。
J Clin Periodontol. 2018 May;45(5):605-612. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12871. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
6
Direct Contact Test for Evaluating Bacterial Growth on Machined and Rough Surface Implants: An In Vitro Study.直接接触测试评估加工和粗糙表面植入物上细菌生长:一项体外研究。
Implant Dent. 2017 Dec;26(6):899-903. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000697.
7
Marginal bone level changes in association with different vertical implant positions: a 3-year retrospective study.不同垂直种植位置相关的边缘骨水平变化:一项3年的回顾性研究。
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2017 Aug;47(4):231-239. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2017.47.4.231. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
8
Implant placement post extraction in esthetic single tooth sites: when immediate, when early, when late?拔牙后即刻、早期和晚期在美学单牙位点植入的位置:何时进行?
Periodontol 2000. 2017 Feb;73(1):84-102. doi: 10.1111/prd.12170.
9
Soft tissue changes and crestal bone loss around platform-switched implants placed at crestal and subcrestal levels: 36-month results from a prospective split-mouth clinical trial.种植体平台转换后在牙槽嵴顶和牙槽嵴顶下水平植入时的软组织变化和牙槽嵴骨丧失:一项前瞻性分口临床试验的 36 个月结果。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Nov;28(11):1342-1347. doi: 10.1111/clr.12990. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
10
Evaluation of Crestal Bone Loss Around Implants Placed at Equicrestal and Subcrestal Levels Before Loading: A Prospective Clinical Study.种植体负载前在牙槽嵴顶和牙槽嵴顶以下水平植入时周围牙槽骨吸收的评估:一项前瞻性临床研究。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Dec;9(12):ZC47-50. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/13911.7000. Epub 2015 Dec 1.