• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同种植体植入深度对种植体周骨水平和软组织行为的影响:一项为期 5 年的随机临床试验。

Effect of different implant placement depths on crestal bone levels and soft tissue behavior: A 5-year randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

ILAPEO College, Curitiba, Brazil.

Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 Mar;31(3):282-293. doi: 10.1111/clr.13569. Epub 2020 Jan 22.

DOI:10.1111/clr.13569
PMID:31886592
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This randomized clinical trial analyzed the long-term (5-year) crestal bone changes and soft tissue dimensions surrounding implants with an internal tapered connection placed in the anterior mandibular region at different depths (equi- and subcrestal).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eleven edentulous patients were randomly divided in a split-mouth design: 28 equicrestal implants (G1) and 27 subcrestal (1-3 mm) implants (G2). Five implants were placed per patient. All implants were immediately loaded. Standardized intraoral radiographs were used to evaluate crestal bone (CB) changes. Patients were assessed immediately, 4, 8, and 60 months after implant placement. The correlation between vertical mucosal thickness (VMT) and soft tissue recession was analyzed. Sub-group analysis was also performed to evaluate the correlation between VMT and CB loss. Rank-based ANOVA was used for comparison between groups (α = .05).

RESULTS

Fifty-five implants (G1 = 28 and G2 = 27) were assessed. Implant and prosthetic survival rate were 100%. Subcrestal positioning resulted in less CB loss (-0.80 mm) when compared to equicrestal position (-0.99 mm), although the difference was not statistically significant (p > .05). Significant CB loss was found within the G1 and G2 groups at two different measurement times (T4 and T60) (p < .05). Implant placement depths and VMT had no effect on soft tissue recession (p > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no statistically significant difference in CB changes between subcrestal and equicrestal implant positioning; however, subcrestal position resulted in higher bone levels. Neither mucosal recession nor vertical mucosa thickness was influenced by different implant placement depths.

摘要

目的

本随机临床试验分析了在前下颌区域以不同深度(平齐和亚嵴下)植入具有内部锥形连接的种植体的长期(5 年)嵴顶骨变化和周围软组织尺寸。

材料和方法

11 名无牙患者随机分为分口设计:28 个平齐嵴种植体(G1)和 27 个亚嵴下(1-3mm)种植体(G2)。每位患者植入 5 个种植体。所有种植体均立即加载。使用标准的口腔内射线照相评估嵴顶骨(CB)变化。患者在植入后立即、4、8 和 60 个月进行评估。分析垂直黏膜厚度(VMT)与软组织退缩的相关性。还进行了亚组分析以评估 VMT 与 CB 丧失之间的相关性。基于等级的 ANOVA 用于组间比较(α=.05)。

结果

评估了 55 个种植体(G1=28 个,G2=27 个)。种植体和修复体的存活率为 100%。与平齐嵴位置相比,亚嵴位置导致较少的 CB 丧失(-0.80mm),尽管差异无统计学意义(p>.05)。在 G1 和 G2 组的两个不同测量时间(T4 和 T60)均发现明显的 CB 丧失(p<.05)。种植体植入深度和 VMT 对软组织退缩没有影响(p>.05)。

结论

在亚嵴和平齐嵴种植体定位之间,CB 变化没有统计学上的显著差异;然而,亚嵴位置导致更高的骨水平。黏膜退缩和垂直黏膜厚度均不受不同种植体植入深度的影响。

相似文献

1
Effect of different implant placement depths on crestal bone levels and soft tissue behavior: A 5-year randomized clinical trial.不同种植体植入深度对种植体周骨水平和软组织行为的影响:一项为期 5 年的随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 Mar;31(3):282-293. doi: 10.1111/clr.13569. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
2
Effect of different implant placement depths on crestal bone levels and soft tissue behavior: a randomized clinical trial.不同种植体植入深度对牙槽嵴骨水平和软组织行为的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Oct;28(10):1227-1233. doi: 10.1111/clr.12946. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
3
Influence of subcrestal implant placement compared with equicrestal position on the peri-implant hard and soft tissues around platform-switched implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.种植体颊侧骨水平位置对平台转换种植体周围软硬组织的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Mar;22(2):555-570. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2301-1. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
4
Clinical and radiographic results of crestal vs. subcrestal placement of implants in posterior areas: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial.种植体在颊侧和近中植入后区的临床和影像学结果:一项随机对照的分口临床试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2023 Oct;25(5):948-959. doi: 10.1111/cid.13230. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
5
The impact of subcrestal placement on short locking-taper implants placed in posterior maxilla and mandible: a retrospective evaluation on hard and soft tissues stability after 2 years of loading.牙槽嵴顶下植入对后牙区上颌骨和下颌骨短型锁定锥度种植体的影响:2年负载后软硬组织稳定性的回顾性评估
Minerva Stomatol. 2014 Nov-Dec;63(11-12):391-402.
6
Comparative Study of the Crestal vs Subcrestal Placement of Dental Implants via Radiographic and Clinical Evaluation.种植体穿龈与非穿龈部位的临床与影像学比较研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2022 Jun 1;23(6):623-627. Print 2022 Sep 23.
7
Soft tissue changes and crestal bone loss around platform-switched implants placed at crestal and subcrestal levels: 36-month results from a prospective split-mouth clinical trial.种植体平台转换后在牙槽嵴顶和牙槽嵴顶下水平植入时的软组织变化和牙槽嵴骨丧失:一项前瞻性分口临床试验的 36 个月结果。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Nov;28(11):1342-1347. doi: 10.1111/clr.12990. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
8
The influence of implant depth, abutment height and mucosal phenotype on peri‑implant bone levels: A 2-year clinical trial.种植体植入深度、基台高度和黏膜表型对种植体周围骨水平的影响:一项为期2年的临床试验。
J Dent. 2024 Sep;148:105264. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105264. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
9
Crestal bone loss related to immediate implants in crestal and subcrestal position: a pilot study in dogs.与嵴顶及嵴下位置即刻种植体相关的嵴顶骨吸收:一项犬类的初步研究
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Nov;25(11):1286-1294. doi: 10.1111/clr.12267. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
10
The influence of submerged healing abutment or subcrestal implant placement on soft tissue thickness and crestal bone stability. A 2-year randomized clinical trial.种植体愈合基台或种植体颈侧置埋对软组织厚度和牙槽嵴稳定性的影响。一项为期 2 年的随机临床试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020 Aug;22(4):497-506. doi: 10.1111/cid.12903. Epub 2020 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence, incidence, risk, and protective factors for soft tissue dehiscences at implant sites in the absence of disease: An AO/AAP systematic review and meta-regression analysis.无疾病情况下种植体部位软组织裂开的患病率、发病率、风险及保护因素:一项AO/AAP系统评价与Meta回归分析
J Periodontol. 2025 Jun;96(6):562-586. doi: 10.1002/JPER.24-0119. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
2
Combined Effect of Abutment Height and Restoration Emergence Angle on Peri-Implant Bone Loss Progression: A Retrospective Analysis.基台高度与修复体边缘显露角对种植体周围骨吸收进展的联合影响:一项回顾性分析
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025 May;36(5):600-612. doi: 10.1111/clr.14408. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
3
Clinical Peri-Implant Parameters and Marginal Bone Loss for Early Mandibular Implant Overdentures: A Follow-Up of 60 Months.
早期下颌种植覆盖义齿的临床种植周参数及边缘骨丢失:60个月随访
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Mar 31;60(4):588. doi: 10.3390/medicina60040588.
4
Association of Peri-Implant Keratinized Mucosa Width and Mucosal Thickness with Early Bone Loss: A Cross-Sectional Study.种植体周围角化黏膜宽度和黏膜厚度与早期骨丧失的相关性:一项横断面研究。
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 27;13(7):1936. doi: 10.3390/jcm13071936.
5
Effect of Customized and Prefabricated Healing Abutments on Peri-Implant Soft Tissue and Bone in Immediate Implant Sites: A Randomized Controlled Trial.定制和预制愈合基台对即刻种植部位种植体周围软组织和骨组织的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 2;13(3):886. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030886.
6
Influence of the Tube Angle on the Measurement Accuracy of Peri-Implant Bone Defects in Rectangular Intraoral X-ray Imaging.口腔内矩形X线成像中管角度对种植体周围骨缺损测量准确性的影响。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 10;13(2):391. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020391.
7
Influence of Periodontal Status and Prosthetic Treatment on Survival and Success Rates in Implant Therapy: A 5-Year Retrospective Follow-Up Study.牙周状况和修复治疗对种植治疗生存率和成功率的影响:一项5年的回顾性随访研究。
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 26;12(13):4275. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134275.
8
Influence of different mucosal phenotype on early and long-term marginal bone loss around implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.不同黏膜表型对种植体周围早期和长期边缘骨丢失的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Apr;27(4):1391-1407. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-04902-w. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
9
The effect of a convergent transmucosal neck on soft tissues and radiographic outcomes: a 1-year follow-up randomized controlled trial.收敛性经黏膜颈部对软组织和影像学结果的影响:一项为期 1 年的随访随机对照试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Jun;27(6):2923-2933. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-04892-9. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
10
The role of keratinized mucosa width as a risk factor for peri-implant disease: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis.角化黏膜宽度作为种植体周围疾病危险因素的作用:系统评价、荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022 Jun;24(3):287-300. doi: 10.1111/cid.13080. Epub 2022 Mar 17.