Baranowski Maciej, Wasyłeczko Monika, Kosowska Anna, Plichta Andrzej, Kowalczyk Sebastian, Chwojnowski Andrzej, Bielecki Wojciech, Czubak Jarosław
Department of Orthopedics, Pediatric Orthopedics and Traumatology, Gruca Orthopaedic and Trauma Teaching Hospital, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Konarskiego 13, 05-400 Otwock, Poland.
Nalecz Institute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering PAS, Księcia Trojdena 4, 02-109 Warsaw, Poland.
Pharmaceutics. 2022 May 8;14(5):1016. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14051016.
One promising method for cartilage regeneration involves combining known methods, such as the microfracture technique with biomaterials, e.g., scaffolds (membranes). The most important feature of such implants is their appropriate rate of biodegradation, without the production of toxic metabolites. This study presents work on two different membranes made of polyester (L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone-PLCA) named "PVP and "Z". The difference between them was the use of different pore precursors-polyvinylpyrrolidone in the "PVP" scaffold and gelatin in the "Z" scaffold. These were implemented in the articular cartilage defects of rabbit knee joints (defects were created for the purpose of the study). After 8, 16, and 24 weeks of observation, and the subsequent termination of the animals, histopathology and gel permeation chromatography (GPC) examinations were performed. Statistical analysis proved that the membranes support the regeneration process. GPC testing proved that the biodegradation process is progressing exponentially, causing the membranes to degrade at the appropriate time. The surgical technique we used meets all the requirements without causing the membrane to migrate after implantation. The "PVP" membrane is better due to the fact that after 24 weeks of observation there was a statistical trend for higher histological ratings. It is also better because it is easier to implant due to its lower fragility then membrane "Z". We conclude that the selected membranes seem to support the regeneration of articular cartilage in the rabbit model.
一种很有前景的软骨再生方法是将已知方法,如微骨折技术与生物材料,例如支架(膜)相结合。这类植入物最重要的特性是其具有合适的生物降解速率,且不产生有毒代谢产物。本研究展示了关于两种由聚酯(L-丙交酯-ε-己内酯共聚物-PLCA)制成的不同膜“PVP”和“Z”的研究工作。它们之间的差异在于使用了不同的造孔前体——“PVP”支架中使用聚乙烯吡咯烷酮,“Z”支架中使用明胶。将这些膜植入兔膝关节的关节软骨缺损处(缺损是为该研究特意制造的)。在观察8周、16周和24周后,随后处死动物,进行组织病理学和凝胶渗透色谱(GPC)检查。统计分析证明这些膜支持再生过程。GPC测试证明生物降解过程呈指数级进行,使膜在合适的时间降解。我们使用的手术技术满足所有要求,且植入后不会导致膜移位。“PVP”膜更好,因为在观察24周后,其组织学评分有更高的统计趋势。它也更好,因为其脆性低于“Z”膜,所以更容易植入。我们得出结论,所选的膜似乎支持兔模型中关节软骨的再生。