Suppr超能文献

无过错赔偿与新冠强制疫苗接种:广义视角下的意大利情况

No-Fault Compensation and Anti-COVID-19 Compulsory Vaccination: The Italian Context in a Broad View.

作者信息

Frati Paola, Di Fazio Nicola, La Russa Raffaele, Santoro Paola, Delogu Giuseppe, Fineschi Vittorio

机构信息

Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy.

Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.

出版信息

Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Apr 19;10(5):635. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10050635.

Abstract

Italy, like other European countries, has produced a series of regulations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Compulsory vaccination has been introduced for the Italian population. Meanwhile, the Decree-Law 27 January 2022 n. 4 provided for the compensation mechanism for those who have received damage of the psycho-physical integrity due to the anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination recommended by the Italian Health Authority. Law 1992 no. 210 already provided for the indemnity system for persons damaged by irreversible complications due to compulsory vaccinations, transfusions, and the administration of blood products. The legislator intended to attribute the right to an indemnity that is not compensatory in order to repair a wrong connected to some hypothesis of liability, but it rather has a welfare character in the broad sense, being attributable to Constitutional fundamentals. In the Italian panorama, although the vaccination damages have been fully included in the already existing law no. 210/1992, to date, no precise indications have been provided regarding the ascertainment of the causal link and the extent of the compensable damage. In the near future, the interest of the scientific community will focus on the evaluation of applications for access to the benefit.

摘要

与其他欧洲国家一样,意大利在新冠疫情期间制定了一系列规定。意大利已对本国人口实施强制接种疫苗。与此同时,2022年1月27日第4号法令规定了对那些因意大利卫生当局推荐的抗SARS-CoV-2疫苗而遭受身心损害的人的赔偿机制。1992年第210号法律已经规定了对因强制接种疫苗、输血和血液制品管理而出现不可逆并发症的受损人员的赔偿制度。立法者旨在赋予一种非补偿性的赔偿权利,以弥补与某些责任假设相关的过错,但从广义上讲,它具有福利性质,可归因于宪法基本要素。在意大利的情况中,尽管疫苗损害已完全纳入现行的第210/1992号法律,但迄今为止,关于因果关系的确定和可赔偿损害的范围尚未提供确切指示。在不久的将来,科学界的兴趣将集中在对福利申请的评估上。

相似文献

2
COVID-19 Compulsory Vaccination: Legal and Bioethical Controversies.新冠病毒强制接种疫苗:法律与生物伦理争议
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 2;9:821522. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.821522. eCollection 2022.
10
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.

本文引用的文献

9
In favour of a bespoke COVID-19 vaccines compensation scheme.支持定制的新冠疫苗补偿计划。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;21(4):448-450. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00065-7. Epub 2021 Feb 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验