• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Medical Students and the Drive for a Single Right Answer: Teaching Complexity and Uncertainty.医学生与追求单一正确答案:教授复杂性与不确定性
ATS Sch. 2021 Dec 7;3(1):27-37. doi: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2021-0083PS. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
3
Implementing the 2009 Institute of Medicine recommendations on resident physician work hours, supervision, and safety.实施 2009 年美国医学研究所关于住院医师工作时间、监督和安全的建议。
Nat Sci Sleep. 2011 Jun 24;3:47-85. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S19649. Print 2011.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Medical Students' Professional Development as Educators Revealed Through Reflections on Their Teaching Following a Students-as-Teachers Course.通过医学生作为教师课程后的教学反思揭示医学生作为教育者的专业发展
Teach Learn Med. 2017 Oct-Dec;29(4):411-419. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2017.1302801. Epub 2017 May 12.
6
'Thinking on my feet': an improvisation course to enhance students' confidence and responsiveness in the medical interview.“随机应变”:一门提升学生在医学面试中自信心与反应能力的即兴课程。
Educ Prim Care. 2013 Feb;24(2):119-24. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2013.11493466.
7
Is there ever a single best answer (SBA): assessment driving certainty in the uncertain world of GP?是否存在唯一最佳答案(SBA):评估在 GP 不确定的世界中带来确定性?
Educ Prim Care. 2023 Jul;34(4):180-183. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2023.2243447. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
8
Medical Student Experiences of Uncertainty Tolerance Moderators: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study.医学生不确定性耐受调节因素的经历:一项纵向定性研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Apr 25;9:864141. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.864141. eCollection 2022.
9
Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery in undergraduate medical education: advances and innovations.本科医学教育中的耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学:进展与创新
Laryngoscope. 2015 Feb;125 Suppl 2:S1-14. doi: 10.1002/lary.24875. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
10
Validation of undergraduate medical student script concordance test (SCT) scores on the clinical assessment of the acute abdomen.本科医学生急性腹痛临床评估脚本一致性测试(SCT)分数的验证
BMC Surg. 2016 Aug 17;16(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12893-016-0173-y.

引用本文的文献

1
The Paradox of Knowledge: Why Medical Students Know More But Understand Less.知识的悖论:为何医学生知道得更多却理解得更少。
Med Sci Educ. 2025 Apr 14;35(3):1761-1766. doi: 10.1007/s40670-025-02379-8. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Decoupling the United States Medical Licensing Examinations (USMLEs) From the Medical Curriculum to Promote Student Well-Being and Professional Identity Development.将美国医师执照考试(USMLE)与医学课程脱钩,以促进学生的幸福感和职业身份认同发展。
Cureus. 2025 May 2;17(5):e83335. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83335. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Are There Common Characteristics and Adjustment Processes among Gen Z?Z世代有哪些共同特征和适应过程?
Malays J Med Sci. 2025 Feb;32(1):197-199. doi: 10.21315/mjms-12-2024-974. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
4
Applying simulation learning theory to identify instructional strategies for Generation Z emergency medicine residency education.应用模拟学习理论确定Z世代急诊医学住院医师教育的教学策略。
AEM Educ Train. 2024 May 19;8(Suppl 1):S56-S69. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10981. eCollection 2024 May.
5
Mapping the Distance: From Competence to Capability.衡量距离:从能力到才能
ATS Sch. 2023 Jun 29;4(4):400-404. doi: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2023-0027VL. eCollection 2023 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Application Fever: Reviewing the Causes, Costs, and Cures for Residency Application Inflation.申请热潮:审视住院医师申请人数膨胀的原因、成本及解决办法
Cureus. 2021 Mar 10;13(3):e13804. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13804.
2
The ubiquity of uncertainty: a scoping review on how undergraduate health professions' students engage with uncertainty.不确定性的普遍性:一项关于本科健康专业学生如何应对不确定性的范围综述。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2021 Aug;26(3):913-958. doi: 10.1007/s10459-021-10028-z. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
3
Twelve tips for interfacing with the new generation of medical students: iGen.与新一代医学生(iGen)打交道的 12 个技巧
Med Teach. 2021 Nov;43(11):1249-1254. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1845305. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
4
Surgeon teachers and millennial learners: Bridging the generation gap.外科教师与千禧一代学习者:弥合代沟
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Jul;162(1):334-341. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.03.177. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
5
The Pass/Fail Decision for USMLE Step 1-Next Steps.美国医师执照考试第一步(USMLE Step 1)通过/未通过的决定——后续步骤
JAMA. 2020 May 26;323(20):2022-2023. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.3938.
6
Teaching Clinical Reasoning and Critical Thinking: From Cognitive Theory to Practical Application.临床推理与批判性思维教学:从认知理论到实际应用。
Chest. 2020 Oct;158(4):1617-1628. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.05.525. Epub 2020 May 22.
7
Barriers of Critical Thinking in Medical Students' Curriculum from the Viewpoint of Medical Education Experts: A Qualitative Study.从医学教育专家视角看医学生课程中批判性思维的障碍:一项定性研究
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2020 Apr;8(2):72-82. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2020.83053.1080.
8
Reflections of a Millennial Surgeon: The Changing Face of Medical Education.一位千禧一代外科医生的反思:医学教育的变革面貌
JAMA Surg. 2020 Aug 1;155(8):685-686. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0751.
9
Student reflections on clinical prioritisation questions and their assessment.学生对临床优先级问题及其评估的反思。
Med Teach. 2020 Oct;42(10):1193-1194. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1736278. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
10
Journey into uncertainty: Medical students' experiences and perceptions of failure.步入未知:医学生对失败的体验和看法。
Med Educ. 2020 Sep;54(9):843-850. doi: 10.1111/medu.14133. Epub 2020 Mar 22.

医学生与追求单一正确答案:教授复杂性与不确定性

Medical Students and the Drive for a Single Right Answer: Teaching Complexity and Uncertainty.

作者信息

Witt Emily E, Onorato Sarah E, Schwartzstein Richard M

机构信息

Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; and.

出版信息

ATS Sch. 2021 Dec 7;3(1):27-37. doi: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2021-0083PS. eCollection 2022 Mar.

DOI:10.34197/ats-scholar.2021-0083PS
PMID:35633993
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9131886/
Abstract

The arrival of Generation Z, the next generation of medical learners, has been accompanied by efforts to adapt teaching practices for this new group of students. Many have identified challenges associated with addressing the needs of modern medical learners. One particular trend we have observed is that medical students are increasingly requesting an "answer key" for all aspects of their medical education. Students often expect to have the correct answers readily available to them to ensure they have reached the correct conclusion and to determine the precise knowledge they need to master. Yet, for much of medicine, and particularly in the care of critically ill patients with multisystem disease in intensive care units, answers are uncertain, and the body of knowledge is ever-growing. Students' regular requests for solutions to be provided to them threaten to undermine their development into critically thinking, self-sufficient physicians. We outline three potential contributors to this multifactorial problem and offer corresponding pedagogical solutions. Specifically, we address how prioritizing outcomes over process, discomfort with uncertainty, and fear of faltering can cause students to seek excessive levels of support that may ultimately do more harm than good. Addressing students' concerns in these three key areas will not only serve students well during their undergraduate medical training but will also equip them with the skills needed to succeed in the clinical realm. To produce physicians capable of navigating an increasingly uncertain world, medical educators will need to help students appreciate that finding the answer is more complex than being provided an answer key.

摘要

Z 世代作为下一代医学学习者的到来,伴随着为适应这群新学生而做出的教学实践努力。许多人已经认识到在满足现代医学学习者需求方面存在的挑战。我们观察到的一个特别趋势是,医学生越来越多地要求获得医学教育各个方面的“答案钥匙”。学生们常常期望能随时得到正确答案,以确保他们得出了正确结论,并确定他们需要掌握的确切知识。然而,对于医学的大部分内容,尤其是在重症监护病房对患有多系统疾病的重症患者的护理中,答案并不确定,知识体系也在不断增长。学生们经常要求为他们提供解决方案,这有可能阻碍他们成长为具有批判性思维、自给自足的医生。我们概述了这个多因素问题的三个潜在促成因素,并提供了相应的教学解决方案。具体而言,我们探讨了如何将结果置于过程之上、对不确定性的不适以及对犯错的恐惧会导致学生寻求过度的支持,而这种支持最终可能弊大于利。在这三个关键领域解决学生的担忧,不仅会在他们本科医学培训期间对学生有益,还会使他们具备在临床领域取得成功所需的技能。为了培养能够在日益不确定的世界中应对自如的医生,医学教育工作者需要帮助学生认识到找到答案比得到答案钥匙要复杂得多。