• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

磺胺嘧啶-甲氧苄啶复方制剂与匹美西林对急性下尿路感染的三日和十日疗程比较

Comparison of three- and ten-day regimens with a sulfadiazine-trimethoprim combination and pivmecillinam in acute lower urinary tract infections.

作者信息

Gordin A, Kalima S, Mäkelä P, Antikainen R

出版信息

Scand J Infect Dis. 1987;19(1):97-102. doi: 10.3109/00365548709032384.

DOI:10.3109/00365548709032384
PMID:3563430
Abstract

132 female hospital employees (mean age 32 years) with uncomplicated, bacteriologically verified acute lower urinary tract infection were included in a randomized study. The patients were treated for 3 or 10 days with a sulfadiazine-trimethoprim combination (500 mg + 150 mg) b.i.d. or for 3 or 10 days with pivmecillinam (500 mg) t.i.d. The first follow-up evaluation was performed 3-5 days after the treatment. In both sulfadiazine-trimethoprim groups the cure rate was 97% and in both pivmecillinam groups 80%. This difference was mainly due to the occurrence of pivmecillinam-resistant Staphylococcus saprophyticus strains. 109 patients attended the second follow-up visit about 4 weeks after treatment. The prevalences of reinfections and relapses were 18% in both 3-day regimens and 4-7% in both 10-day regimens. No side-effects were reported in the 3-day sulfadiazine-trimethoprim group, while about 20% in the corresponding 10-day group had side-effects. Side-effects were not common in patients treated with pivmecillinam.

摘要

132名无并发症、经细菌学证实为急性下尿路感染的女性医院员工(平均年龄32岁)被纳入一项随机研究。患者接受磺胺嘧啶-甲氧苄啶组合(500毫克+150毫克)每日两次治疗3天或10天,或接受匹美西林(500毫克)每日三次治疗3天或10天。首次随访评估在治疗后3至5天进行。在两个磺胺嘧啶-甲氧苄啶组中治愈率均为97%,在两个匹美西林组中均为80%。这种差异主要是由于耐匹美西林的腐生葡萄球菌菌株的出现。109名患者在治疗后约4周参加了第二次随访。在两种3天治疗方案中,再感染和复发的发生率均为18%,在两种10天治疗方案中均为4-7%。在3天磺胺嘧啶-甲氧苄啶组中未报告有副作用,而在相应的10天组中约20%有副作用。接受匹美西林治疗的患者中副作用不常见。

相似文献

1
Comparison of three- and ten-day regimens with a sulfadiazine-trimethoprim combination and pivmecillinam in acute lower urinary tract infections.磺胺嘧啶-甲氧苄啶复方制剂与匹美西林对急性下尿路感染的三日和十日疗程比较
Scand J Infect Dis. 1987;19(1):97-102. doi: 10.3109/00365548709032384.
2
In-vitro sensitivity of organisms causing urinary tract infections to four common oral antibiotics and to pivmecillinam.引起尿路感染的微生物对四种常见口服抗生素及匹美西林的体外敏感性
West Indian Med J. 1988 Dec;37(4):201-4.
3
A multi-centre general practice clinical evaluation of pivmecillinam plus pivampicillin ('Miraxid') and co-trimoxazole ('Septrin') in respiratory tract infections.多中心全科医疗对匹美西林加匹氨西林(“Miraxid”)与复方新诺明(“Septrin”)治疗呼吸道感染的临床评估。
Curr Med Res Opin. 1985;9(10):659-65. doi: 10.1185/03007998509109648.
4
Pivmecillinam plus pivampicillin in urinary tract infections: a randomized, open comparison with co-trimoxazole in hospitalized patients.匹美西林加匹氨西林治疗尿路感染:在住院患者中与复方新诺明的随机、开放对比研究
Pharmatherapeutica. 1981;2(9):581-6.
5
A comparison of pivmecillinam/pivampicillin and co-trimoxazole in hospitalized patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.住院慢性支气管炎急性加重患者中匹美西林/匹氨西林与复方新诺明的比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984 Aug;14(2):179-84. doi: 10.1093/jac/14.2.179.
6
Treatment of urinary tract infections in gynecological patients. A randomized study comparing pivampicillin-pivmecillinam with trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole.妇科患者尿路感染的治疗。一项比较匹氨西林-匹美西林与甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑的随机研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1983;62(5):515-8. doi: 10.3109/00016348309154228.
7
Comparative efficacy of 3-day and 7-day chemotherapy with twice-daily pivmecillinam in urinary tract infections seen in general practice.在全科医疗中,每日两次服用匹美西林进行3天和7天化疗治疗尿路感染的疗效比较
Curr Med Res Opin. 1984;9(3):197-203. doi: 10.1185/03007998409109580.
8
Nalidixic acid and pivmecillinam for treatment of acute lower urinary tract infections.萘啶酸和匹美西林治疗急性下尿路感染。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 1985 Nov;3(4):227-32. doi: 10.3109/02813438509013954.
9
Norfloxacin vs. pivmecillinam in the treatment of uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections in hospitalized elderly patients.诺氟沙星与匹美西林治疗老年住院患者单纯性下尿路感染的疗效比较
Scand J Infect Dis. 1990;22(3):339-44. doi: 10.3109/00365549009027057.
10
Pivmecillinam, co-trimoxazole and oral mecillinam in gastroenteritis due to Vibrio spp.匹美西林、复方新诺明及口服美西林治疗弧菌属所致的肠胃炎
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984 Feb;13(2):171-5. doi: 10.1093/jac/13.2.171.

引用本文的文献

1
New Perspectives on Antimicrobial Agents: Pivmecillinam.抗菌药物的新视角:匹美西林
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2025 Aug 6;69(8):e0182424. doi: 10.1128/aac.01824-24. Epub 2025 Jul 21.
2
Safety and Tolerability of Pivmecillinam During More Than Four Decades of Clinical Experience: A Systematic Review.四十年临床经验中匹美西林的安全性和耐受性:一项系统评价
Clin Infect Dis. 2025 Feb 24;80(2):280-299. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae621.
3
Antibiotic duration for treating uncomplicated, symptomatic lower urinary tract infections in elderly women.
老年女性单纯性、有症状下尿路感染的抗生素治疗疗程
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;2008(3):CD001535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001535.pub2.
4
Urinary tract infections in adult general practice patients.成年全科门诊患者的尿路感染
Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Sep;52(482):752-61.
5
Decision making, evidence, audit, and education: case study of antibiotic prescribing in general practice.决策、证据、审计与教育:全科医疗中抗生素处方的案例研究
BMJ. 2000 Apr 22;320(7242):1114-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7242.1114.
6
Comparison of 3-day versus 14-day treatment of lower urinary tract infection in children.
Int Urol Nephrol. 1991;23(2):129-34. doi: 10.1007/BF02549709.
7
Optimal characteristics of agents to treat uncomplicated urinary tract infections.治疗单纯性尿路感染药物的最佳特性。
Infection. 1992;20 Suppl 4:S266-71. doi: 10.1007/BF01710012.