Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, MD, 20740, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Geroscience. 2023 Feb;45(1):105-118. doi: 10.1007/s11357-022-00594-4. Epub 2022 May 30.
Although prior research has established associations between childhood socioeconomic disadvantage and all-cause mortality, there is still limited research investigating (1) the consistency between subjective and objective reports of childhood socioeconomic status, (2) sex differences in the associations between childhood socioeconomic disadvantage and all-cause mortality, and (3) potential mediators within these associations. Drawing on data from the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) cohort (N = 7425), we examined the associations between three distinct indicators of childhood socioeconomic disadvantage and all-cause mortality risk, and whether these associations differ for males and females. Among males only, lower perceived relative childhood financial status, lower levels of parents' education, and receipt of welfare during childhood were associated with excess mortality risk, adjusted for age and minority status, with adjusted hazard ratios ranging from 1.24 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02, 1.51) for perceived childhood financial status to 1.28 (95% CI: 1.11, 1.47) for welfare in childhood. When additionally adjusted for education, substance use, depression, and underlying health conditions, only childhood welfare status maintained an association with mortality (AHR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.02-1.35). Mediation analyses among males revealed that education, substance use, depression, and underlying health conditions accounted for substantial proportions of these associations, ranging from 31.03 to 57.63%, across indicators of childhood socioeconomic disadvantage. Future research is needed to clarify the developmental mechanisms that lead to sex differences and identify effective strategies to intervene on the relation between childhood socioeconomic position and excess mortality risk among males.
尽管先前的研究已经确定了儿童时期社会经济劣势与全因死亡率之间的关联,但仍有有限的研究调查了以下三个方面:(1)主观和客观报告的儿童时期社会经济地位之间的一致性;(2)儿童时期社会经济劣势与全因死亡率之间关联的性别差异;(3)这些关联中的潜在中介因素。利用来自美国中期生活(MIDUS)队列(N=7425)的数据,我们研究了三种不同的儿童时期社会经济劣势指标与全因死亡率风险之间的关联,以及这些关联在男性和女性中是否存在差异。仅在男性中,较低的感知相对童年经济地位、父母教育程度较低以及童年时期接受福利与超额死亡风险相关,调整年龄和少数族裔地位后,调整后的危害比范围从感知童年经济地位的 1.24(95%置信区间[CI]:1.02,1.51)到童年时期接受福利的 1.28(95% CI:1.11,1.47)。当进一步调整教育、物质使用、抑郁和潜在健康状况时,只有童年福利状况与死亡率保持关联(AHR,1.17;95% CI,1.02-1.35)。男性中的中介分析表明,教育、物质使用、抑郁和潜在健康状况在儿童时期社会经济劣势的各种指标中解释了这些关联的很大比例,范围从 31.03%到 57.63%。需要进一步的研究来阐明导致性别差异的发展机制,并确定有效策略来干预儿童时期社会经济地位与男性超额死亡率之间的关系。