Suppr超能文献

单腿任务中任务类型和运动速度对下肢运动学的影响。

The influence of task type and movement speed on lower limb kinematics during single-leg tasks.

机构信息

Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.

Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy; Dipartimento di Meccanica, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy.

出版信息

Gait Posture. 2022 Jul;96:109-116. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.05.020. Epub 2022 May 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Single-leg squats and step-downs are commonly used to assess kinematic variables that may be linked to injuries. Task type and movement speed may influence the outcomes of interest because of different balance requirements.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the influence of task type and movement speed on lower limb kinematics?

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional within-subjects study where 22 physically active females performed three single-leg functional tasks (Squat, Anterior step-down, and Lateral step-down) at three movement speeds (slow [5 s], fast [2 s], and self-selected), while three-dimensional kinematic variables were recorded. Displacement values from the initial position in single-leg support until 60° or peak knee flexion were calculated. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare tasks and speeds, and Cohen's d effect size (ES) was calculated for significant pairwise comparisons.

RESULTS

At 60°, lateral step-down presented the greatest hip adduction (large ES) and internal rotation (small ES). The anterior step-down had the lowest knee abduction displacement while the squat had the greatest (small to medium ES). At peak knee flexion, values increased but differences between tasks followed a similar pattern. Slow speed induced smaller displacement angles at the knee and hip (trivial to small ES).

SIGNIFICANCE

When knee abduction is the variable of interest, the SLS may be the best test since it elicits the greatest displacement, but when evaluating hip motion, SD might be best. Knee abduction and internal rotation were lowest in the slow condition, suggesting that faster speed may be more appropriate to detect abnormal movement patterns. However, the small difference in absolute values (i.e., degrees of movement) may indicate that the differences are not clinically significant, particularly for speed comparisons. Researchers and clinicians should take this into consideration when choosing the most appropriate task and the instruction to give during its execution.

摘要

背景

单腿下蹲和单腿台阶下降常用于评估可能与损伤相关的运动学变量。由于平衡要求不同,任务类型和运动速度可能会影响感兴趣的结果。

研究问题

任务类型和运动速度对下肢运动学有什么影响?

方法

这是一项横断面的个体内研究,22 名身体活跃的女性以三种运动速度(慢[5 秒]、快[2 秒]和自主选择)进行三种单腿功能性任务(深蹲、前台阶下降和侧台阶下降),同时记录三维运动学变量。从单腿支撑的初始位置到 60°或最大膝关节屈曲计算位移值。采用双向重复测量方差分析比较任务和速度,对有显著差异的组间比较计算 Cohen's d 效应量(ES)。

结果

在 60°时,侧台阶下降的髋关节内收(大 ES)和内旋(小 ES)最大。前台阶下降的膝关节外展位移最小,而深蹲的最大(小到中等 ES)。在最大膝关节屈曲时,数值增加,但任务之间的差异呈现出相似的模式。慢速会导致膝关节和髋关节的位移角度更小(微小到小 ES)。

意义

当膝关节外展是感兴趣的变量时,SLS 可能是最好的测试,因为它会产生最大的位移,但当评估髋关节运动时,SD 可能是最好的。在慢速条件下,膝关节外展和内旋最小,这表明更快的速度可能更适合检测异常运动模式。然而,绝对数值(即运动角度)的差异很小,表明差异在临床上可能并不显著,尤其是在速度比较方面。研究人员和临床医生在选择最合适的任务和在执行任务时给予指令时应考虑到这一点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验