Department of Anesthesiology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, No.150 Haping Rd., Nangang District, Harbin, 150081, China.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 May 30;22(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01703-8.
Different types of anesthesia may affect cancer patient's outcomes, we compared the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of patients with pancreatic cancer under total intravenous and inhalation anesthesia.
The authors collected the electronic medical records of patients who had accepted at a pancreatectomy from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2016. Patients respectively received total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) or inhalational anesthesia (INHA). Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (SIPTW)was used to minimize differences. Kaplan-Meier survival was established to analyze the influence of sort of anesthesia on disease-free and overall survival. We compare the effects of each sort of anesthesia on cancer recurrence or metastasis and all-cause mortality.
A total of 463 patients who had undergone pancreatic cancer resection were collected in this study, of which 421 patients were available (TIVA group, n = 114 INHA group, n = 307). After SIPTW there were no significant differences between the two groups in disease-free survival (hazard ratio, 1.01, 95%CI, 0.78 to 1.29, P = 0.959) or overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.11, 95%CI, 0.87 to 1.42, P = 0.405).
In conclusion, the present study showed no significant difference in overall survival and disease-free survival between total intravenous anesthesia and volatile anesthesia.
不同类型的麻醉可能会影响癌症患者的预后,我们比较了接受全静脉和吸入麻醉的胰腺癌患者的总生存率(OS)和无病生存率(DFS)。
作者收集了 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 12 月 31 日接受胰切除术的患者的电子病历。患者分别接受全静脉麻醉(TIVA)或吸入麻醉(INHA)。采用稳定逆概率治疗加权(SIPTW)来最小化差异。建立 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析来分析麻醉方式对无病和总生存的影响。我们比较了每种麻醉方式对癌症复发或转移和全因死亡率的影响。
本研究共纳入 463 例接受胰腺癌切除术的患者,其中 421 例患者资料完整(TIVA 组,n=114;INHA 组,n=307)。SIPTW 后,两组无病生存率(风险比,1.01;95%CI,0.78 至 1.29;P=0.959)或总生存率(风险比,1.11;95%CI,0.87 至 1.42;P=0.405)差异无统计学意义。
总之,本研究表明全静脉麻醉与挥发性麻醉在总生存率和无病生存率方面无显著差异。