• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鼻部美学的认知:鼻子还是脸?

Perception of Nasal Aesthetics: Nose or Face?

机构信息

Department of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Marmara University School of Medicine, Bağdat cad. Konak apt. No: 189/8, Çiftehavuzlar, 34730, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Dec;46(6):2931-2937. doi: 10.1007/s00266-022-02943-2. Epub 2022 May 31.

DOI:10.1007/s00266-022-02943-2
PMID:35641687
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aesthetic assessment of the nose might not be limited to the nose as an isolated facial unit but might be the result of a broader perception of the whole facial image. The aim of this study was to investigate if the aesthetic evaluation of a nose is made by sole observation of the nose or influenced by the other features of the face.

METHODS

Nose and face photographs of 20 voluntary models were taken from five different angles and merged into a single image of just the noses and whole faces of each model. First the nose and then the face photos were sent to a reviewer group consisting of 100 individuals from different professions to evaluate the nose's beauty on standard questionnaires with a four-week interval to complicate the recall process.

RESULTS

Aesthetic evaluation of the isolated nose (Group 1) and the nose with the whole face (Group 2) were compared through Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores ranging from 1 to 10 (1: the least, 10: the highest). The mean VAS score of the Whole Face Group (5.26 ± 1.28) was significantly higher than the score of the Isolated Nose Group (4.50 ± 1.32) (p 0.001). There was no significant difference between the scores of reviewers considering their gender, profession, or experience of having an aesthetic operation previously.

CONCLUSION

Current study revealed that in the evaluation of the beauty of the nose, the holistic perception of the face is as important as the perfection of the angles and proportions within the nose itself.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

摘要

背景

对鼻子的审美评估可能不仅局限于鼻子作为一个孤立的面部单位,而是可能是对整个面部形象的更广泛感知的结果。本研究旨在探讨对鼻子的审美评估是否仅通过单独观察鼻子来进行,还是受到面部其他特征的影响。

方法

从五个不同的角度拍摄了 20 名自愿模特的鼻子和面部照片,并将这些照片合并成每个模特的鼻子和整个面部的单一图像。首先,将鼻子和面部照片发送给由来自不同职业的 100 人组成的评审团,让他们在标准问卷上对鼻子的美丽进行评估,两次评估之间间隔四周,以增加回忆过程的复杂性。

结果

通过范围为 1 到 10 的视觉模拟量表 (VAS) 评分,比较了单独的鼻子(第 1 组)和带有整个面部的鼻子(第 2 组)的美学评估。全脸组的平均 VAS 评分(5.26±1.28)明显高于单独的鼻子组(4.50±1.32)(p<0.001)。考虑到评审员的性别、职业或之前是否有过美容手术的经验,他们的评分之间没有显著差异。

结论

本研究表明,在评估鼻子的美丽时,对面部整体感知的重要性与鼻子本身的角度和比例的完美程度一样重要。

证据水平 V:本期刊要求作者为每篇文章分配一个证据水平。有关这些基于证据的医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者指南 www.springer.com/00266 。

相似文献

1
Perception of Nasal Aesthetics: Nose or Face?鼻部美学的认知:鼻子还是脸?
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Dec;46(6):2931-2937. doi: 10.1007/s00266-022-02943-2. Epub 2022 May 31.
2
The Ideals of Facial Beauty Among Chinese Aesthetic Practitioners: Results from a Large National Survey.中国人审美从业者对面部美的理想:一项大型全国调查的结果。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019 Feb;43(1):102-114. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1241-8. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
3
Morphological quantitative criteria and aesthetic evaluation of eight female Han face types.八种女性汉族面型的形态学定量标准和美学评价。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013 Apr;37(2):445-53. doi: 10.1007/s00266-013-0081-9. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
4
Outcome of In Situ Septoplasty and Extracorporeal Subtotal Septal Reconstruction in Crooked Noses: A Randomized Self-Controlled Study.歪鼻原位鼻中隔成形术与体外鼻中隔部分重建术的疗效:一项随机自身对照研究。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018 Feb;42(1):234-243. doi: 10.1007/s00266-017-0973-1. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
5
The Role of Ideal Angles, Ratios, and Divine Proportions in Aesthetic Evaluation of Adolescents.理想角度、比例和黄金比例在青少年审美评价中的作用。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016 Feb;40(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s00266-015-0581-x. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
6
Perception of the Nose and Lower Face Before and After Orthognathic Surgery in Subjects with Dento-maxillofacial Deformities: An Eye-Tracking Study.正颌手术后牙颌面畸形患者对鼻和下面部的感知:一项眼动研究。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Aug;46(4):1731-1737. doi: 10.1007/s00266-022-02854-2. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
7
Ideals of Facial Beauty Amongst the Chinese Population: Results from a Large National Survey.中国人群对面部美的理想标准:一项大型全国性调查的结果
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018 Dec;42(6):1540-1550. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1188-9. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
8
There Is no Universal Standard of Beauty.不存在普遍适用的美的标准。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Dec;48(24):5273-5282. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04266-w. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
9
Comparison of Facial Proportions Between Beauty Pageant Contestants and Ordinary Young Women of Korean Ethnicity: A Three-Dimensional Photogrammetric Analysis.选美比赛选手与朝鲜族普通年轻女性面部比例的比较:三维摄影测量分析
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018 Jun;42(3):748-758. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1071-8. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
10
The Influence of Different Light Angles During Standardized Patient Photographic Assessment on the Aesthetic Perception of the Face.不同光照角度对标准化患者面部照片评估的美学感知影响。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021 Dec;45(6):2751-2759. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02314-3. Epub 2021 May 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Observational Study: Preliminary Evaluation of Nostril Narrowing in Relation to Unilateral Mastication.观察性研究:单侧咀嚼与鼻孔缩小关系的初步评估
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 17;14(4):1319. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041319.
2
Three-dimensional digital model of the facial nerve assisted in the excision of benign parotid tumors based on 3D-DESS-WE-MRI.基于3D-DESS-WE-MRI的面神经三维数字模型辅助腮腺良性肿瘤切除术
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):30893. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81498-5.
3
Cosmetic Surgery and the Diversity of Cultural and Ethnic Perceptions of Facial, Breast, and Gluteal Aesthetics in Women: A Comprehensive Review.
美容手术与女性对面部、乳房和臀部美学的文化及种族认知多样性:一项综述
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2023 Jun 7;16:1443-1456. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S410621. eCollection 2023.