• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同光照角度对标准化患者面部照片评估的美学感知影响。

The Influence of Different Light Angles During Standardized Patient Photographic Assessment on the Aesthetic Perception of the Face.

机构信息

CH Dermatologia, Medellin, Colombia.

Independent Photographer, Medellin, Colombia.

出版信息

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021 Dec;45(6):2751-2759. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02314-3. Epub 2021 May 13.

DOI:10.1007/s00266-021-02314-3
PMID:33987696
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8677634/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

2D baseline and follow-up clinical images are potentially subject to inconsistency due to alteration of imaging parameters. However, no study to date has attempted to quantify the magnitude by which such images can be influenced.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present study is to identify the magnitude by which images can be influenced by changing the imaging light angle.

METHODS

This study is based on the evaluation of 2D frontal images of the face and included a total of 51 subjects of which n = 14 were males and n = 37 were females. Faces were photographed at 0°, 30°, and 60° light angle under identical and standardized conditions. Images were randomized and rated by 27 blinded raters for age, facial attractiveness, body mass index (BMI), temporal hollowing, lower cheek fullness, nasolabial sulcus severity, and jawline contour.

RESULTS

Facial attractiveness decreased, facial unattractiveness increased and the evaluated BMI (based on facial assessment) increased statistically significantly at 60°. The assessment of regional facial scores, i.e., temporal hollowing, lower cheek fullness, and jawline contour, showed no statistically meaningful changes both at 30° and at 60° light angle.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that there might be an observed blind range in light angle (0°-30°) which does not influence facial assessment. Increasing the light angle past the threshold value to 60° might result in a statistically significant impact on facial perception which should be accounted for when documenting and/or presenting facial 2D images.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

摘要

背景

二维基线和随访临床图像可能由于成像参数的改变而不一致。然而,迄今为止,尚无研究试图量化这些图像受影响的程度。

目的

本研究的目的是确定改变成像光角对图像影响的程度。

方法

本研究基于对面部的二维正面图像的评估,共纳入了 51 名受试者,其中 n=14 名男性,n=37 名女性。在相同和标准化的条件下,以 0°、30°和 60°的光角拍摄面部照片。在随机和盲法条件下,由 27 名评分者对图像进行年龄、面部吸引力、体重指数(BMI)、颞部凹陷、面颊饱满度、鼻唇沟严重程度和下颌线轮廓的评估。

结果

在 60°时,面部吸引力降低,不吸引力增加,基于面部评估的 BMI 增加具有统计学意义。30°和 60°光角时,区域面部评分(即颞部凹陷、面颊饱满度和下颌线轮廓)的评估无统计学意义的变化。

结论

结果表明,在光角(0°-30°)范围内可能存在观察盲区,不会影响面部评估。将光角增加超过阈值(60°)可能会对面部感知产生统计学上的显著影响,在记录和/或呈现面部二维图像时应考虑到这一点。

证据等级 V:本杂志要求作者为每篇文章指定一个证据等级。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参考目录或在线作者指南 www.springer.com/00266 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0164/8677634/73fae8128cea/266_2021_2314_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0164/8677634/7a2d8c7c1399/266_2021_2314_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0164/8677634/26689a8d59e0/266_2021_2314_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0164/8677634/e029761e9525/266_2021_2314_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0164/8677634/55434081171e/266_2021_2314_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0164/8677634/b8db8d21c5fe/266_2021_2314_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0164/8677634/b9c54cbca95f/266_2021_2314_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0164/8677634/73fae8128cea/266_2021_2314_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0164/8677634/7a2d8c7c1399/266_2021_2314_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0164/8677634/26689a8d59e0/266_2021_2314_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0164/8677634/e029761e9525/266_2021_2314_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0164/8677634/55434081171e/266_2021_2314_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0164/8677634/b8db8d21c5fe/266_2021_2314_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0164/8677634/b9c54cbca95f/266_2021_2314_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0164/8677634/73fae8128cea/266_2021_2314_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The Influence of Different Light Angles During Standardized Patient Photographic Assessment on the Aesthetic Perception of the Face.不同光照角度对标准化患者面部照片评估的美学感知影响。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021 Dec;45(6):2751-2759. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02314-3. Epub 2021 May 13.
2
Morphological quantitative criteria and aesthetic evaluation of eight female Han face types.八种女性汉族面型的形态学定量标准和美学评价。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013 Apr;37(2):445-53. doi: 10.1007/s00266-013-0081-9. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
3
Perception of Nasal Aesthetics: Nose or Face?鼻部美学的认知:鼻子还是脸?
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Dec;46(6):2931-2937. doi: 10.1007/s00266-022-02943-2. Epub 2022 May 31.
4
A Study on the Aesthetic Parameters and Proportions of the External Contour for Minimally Invasive Facial Injection.微创面部注射外部轮廓美学参数与比例的研究
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Dec;48(23):4750-4759. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04232-6. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
5
Aesthetic Surgery Before-and-After Photography Bias on Instagram.Instagram上美容外科手术前后照片的偏差
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Oct;47(5):2144-2149. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03398-9. Epub 2023 May 30.
6
Perception of Age, Attractiveness, and Tiredness After Isolated and Combined Facial Subunit Aging.孤立和联合面部亚单位老化后的年龄、吸引力和疲劳感认知
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015 Dec;39(6):856-69. doi: 10.1007/s00266-015-0553-1. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
7
The Selfie View: Perioperative Photography in the Digital Age.自拍视角:数字时代的围手术期摄影
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020 Jun;44(3):1066-1070. doi: 10.1007/s00266-019-01593-1. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
8
Truth Lies in the Depths: Novel Insights into Facial Aesthetic Measurements from a U.S. Survey Panel.真相深藏:美国调查小组对面部美学测量的新见解。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Oct;48(19):3711-3717. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04022-0. Epub 2024 May 21.
9
Understanding the Interplay Between Skin, Fascia, and Muscles of the Midface in Facial Aging.理解面部衰老中中面部的皮肤、筋膜和肌肉之间的相互作用。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Sep;48(18):3568-3576. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04070-6. Epub 2024 May 9.
10
A Comprehensive Ultrasound Investigation of Lower Facial and Neck Structure.面部下部和颈部结构的全面超声检查
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Jan;49(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04313-6. Epub 2024 Aug 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Efficacy of Combined Platelet-Rich Plasma and Microneedling for Aesthetic Rejuvenation of the Periorbital Area: A Randomized, Blinded Cohort Study.评估富血小板血浆联合微针治疗眶周区域美容年轻化的疗效:一项随机、双盲队列研究。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2025 Feb;24(2):e16717. doi: 10.1111/jocd.16717. Epub 2024 Dec 8.
2
Higher Responder Rates Observed With Live Participant Assessment Versus Photographic Assessment After VYC-20L Hyaluronic Acid Treatment for Chin Augmentation.在 VYC-20L 透明质酸颏部填充治疗后,通过活体评估观察到的应答者比例高于照片评估。
Aesthet Surg J. 2024 Apr 4;44(5):527-536. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjad348.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The Course of the Angular Artery in the Midface: Implications for Surgical and Minimally Invasive Procedures.面中部的眶下动脉走行:对手术和微创手术的影响。
Aesthet Surg J. 2021 Jun 14;41(7):805-813. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjaa176.
2
Does taking selfies lead to increased desire to undergo cosmetic surgery.自拍会导致接受整容手术的欲望增加吗?
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020 Aug;19(8):2025-2032. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13267. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
3
Validated Assessment Scales for Cellulite Dimples on the Buttocks and Thighs in Female Patients.
Hydrolipidic Characteristics and Clinical Efficacy of a Dermocosmetic Formulation for the Improvement of Homeostasis on Oily Mature Skin.
一种用于改善油性成熟皮肤内稳态的皮肤美容配方的水脂特性及临床疗效
Life (Basel). 2022 Dec 28;13(1):87. doi: 10.3390/life13010087.
用于评估女性患者臀部和大腿部位脂肪团凹痕的有效评估量表。
Dermatol Surg. 2019 Aug;45 Suppl 1:S2-S11. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001993.
4
The Functional Anatomy of the Superficial Fat Compartments of the Face: A Detailed Imaging Study.面部浅脂肪室的功能解剖:详细的影像学研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Jun;141(6):1351-1359. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004364.
5
About Face: Matching Unfamiliar Faces Across Rotations of View and Lighting.转向:匹配不同视角和光照旋转下的陌生面孔。
Iperception. 2017 Nov 29;8(6):2041669517744221. doi: 10.1177/2041669517744221. eCollection 2017 Nov-Dec.
6
Perception of object illumination depends on highlights and shadows, not shading.对物体光照的感知取决于高光和阴影,而非明暗度。
J Vis. 2017 Jul 1;17(8):2. doi: 10.1167/17.8.2.
7
Digital photography in plastic surgery: how to achieve reasonable standardization outside a photographic studio.整形手术中的数码摄影:如何在摄影工作室之外实现合理的标准化。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007 Mar-Apr;31(2):194-200. doi: 10.1007/s00266-006-0125-5.
8
Standards for digital photography in cranio-maxillo-facial surgery - Part I: Basic views and guidelines.颅颌面外科数字摄影标准 - 第一部分:基本视图和指南。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2006 Mar;34(2):65-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2005.11.002. Epub 2006 Jan 19.
9
Standardized photography in facial plastic surgery: pearls and pitfalls.面部整形手术中的标准化摄影:要点与陷阱
Facial Plast Surg. 1999;15(2):93-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1064305.
10
Standardizing digital photography: it's not all in the eye of the beholder.规范数码摄影:并非全由旁观者的视角决定。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Oct;108(5):1334-44. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200110000-00037.