Environmental Health Unit, Agency for Health Protection, Pavia, Italy.
Department EMbeDS, Management and Health Laboratory, Institute of Management, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 31;22(1):723. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08111-1.
Despite recommendations, mammography screening is often insufficiently integrated into specialist breast centres. A national, cross-sectional, voluntary, online survey on this issue was carried out among the Italian breast centres associated with Senonetwork, the Italian network of breast cancer services.
A 73-item questionnaire was created, pre-tested and piloted. Centres integrating and not integrating a screening programme were compared using the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model. Centres' clustering was performed using the Gower's distance metric. Groups and clusters were compared with the equality-of-means test.
The response rate was 82/128 (65%). Overall, 84% (69/82) breast centres reported a collaboration with a screening programme in performing and/or reading mammograms and in the diagnostic work-up of women with abnormal screening results. The same proportion was observed among those centres responding to all questions (62/74). Performance expectancies (or the perceived usefulness of integration in terms of clinical quality, patient convenience, ease of job, and professional growth), satisfaction and motivation were higher in those centres collaborating with the screening programme. Effort expectancy indicators (or the degree to which the respondents believe that the integration is easy to implement) and those concerning the existence of facilitating conditions were lower both in centres collaborating and not collaborating with the screening programme. Among the former, six clusters of centres, distributed from 'no integration' to 'high', were identified. In cluster analysis, the highest level of integration was associated with higher agreement that integration eases the job, offers better opportunities for professional growth, and makes the working environment more satisfactory. The least integrated cluster assigned the lowest score to the statement that local health authority made available the resources needed.
While confirming the positive effects of integrating screening programmes into breast centres, this survey has brought to light specific difficulties that must be faced. The results provide insights into the importance of integration focusing on the perspectives of professional career and motivation. The deficiency of facilitating conditions to integration is modifiable. Screening professionals' societies may have a role as initiators of the integration. Other supporting actions may be included in health laws at the national and regional level.
尽管有相关建议,但乳腺摄影筛查在乳腺专科中心的实施往往不够充分。本研究在 Senonetwork(意大利乳腺癌服务网络)的意大利乳腺中心网络中开展了一项全国性、横断面、自愿性、在线调查,旨在调查这一问题。
创建并预先测试了一份包含 73 个问题的调查问卷,并进行了试点研究。采用统一技术接受和使用理论(UTAUT)模型比较整合和未整合筛查项目的乳腺中心。采用 Gower 距离度量对中心进行聚类。使用均数检验比较组间和聚类间差异。
应答率为 82/128(65%)。总体而言,84%(69/82)的乳腺中心报告与筛查项目合作,共同开展和/或阅读乳腺 X 线摄影检查,并对筛查结果异常的女性进行诊断性检查。对所有问题均作出回答的中心也观察到相同的比例(62/74)。在与筛查项目合作的中心中,绩效期望(即整合对临床质量、患者便利、工作轻松和职业发展的有用性的感知)、满意度和动机更高。在与筛查项目合作和不合作的中心中,努力期望指标(即受访者认为整合易于实施的程度)和与促进条件相关的指标均较低。在前者中,发现了 6 个中心聚类,从“无整合”到“高度整合”分布。在聚类分析中,最高的整合水平与以下观点一致,即整合可以减轻工作负担、提供更多职业发展机会、使工作环境更加令人满意。整合程度最低的聚类对当地卫生当局提供所需资源的说法给予了最低评分。
本研究在证实将筛查项目整合到乳腺中心具有积极影响的同时,也揭示了一些必须面对的具体困难。研究结果突显了整合对职业发展和激励的重要性。整合缺乏促进条件是可以改变的。筛查专业人员协会可以在整合的发起中发挥作用。在国家和地区层面的卫生法律中,还可以包括其他支持性措施。