Liu Ning, Ye Min, Zhu Qinya, Chen Dingchao, Xu Mingmin, He Jia, Li Qian, Li Jie
Outpatient Department, Zhejiang Rongjun Hospital, Jiaxing, Zhejiang Province, 314000, People's Republic of China.
Nursing Department, Zhejiang Rongjun Hospital, Jiaxing, Zhejiang Province, 314000, People's Republic of China.
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2022 May 25;15:947-954. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S365390. eCollection 2022.
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has developed into a worldwide pandemic, which presents several challenges for frontline health-care workers (HCWs). HCWs are highly prone to various skin diseases due to prolonged use of personal protective equipment (PPE). The most frequently used type of PPE is facemasks. To effectively control adverse skin reactions, there is an urgent need for a range of preventive practices.
This cross-sectional study was conducted at 12 hospitals in Zhejiang province, China. HCWs were invited to participate in the web survey. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers using a predesigned data collection form and analyzed with SPSS 20.0.
A total of 1147 questionnaires were collected, and of these, 1090 (95.03%) were valid and returned. The incidence of chest tightness and shortness of breath and face eczema was significantly higher in HCWs wearing N95 facemasks (41.91%; 31.62%) than in the HCWs wearing medical facemasks (38.05%, = 0.010; 21.91%, = 0.012). The incidence of ear pain and indentation was significantly higher in HCWs wearing hang-facemasks (83.81%) than in HCWs wearing strains-facemasks (61.19%, < 0.001). The incidence of ear pain and indentation was significantly higher in HCWs wearing undiscriminating size code facemasks (79.88%) than in the HCWs wearing discriminating size code facemasks (67.86%, = 0.031). There was a significant reduction ( < 0.001) in the incidence of HCWs without adverse reactions (ADRs) with increasing time wearing facemasks.
Incidence of ADRs does not significantly increase with the durations of mask wear where wearing mask time exceeded 4 hours per day. The medical staff generally wore masks for more than 4 hours per day; therefore, we recommend taking 15 min of rest after 2 hours of mask-wearing. Results in this study support the conclusion that the type of strain-facemasks and discriminating size code facemasks has a lower incidence of ADRs than other type of medical facemasks.
2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)已发展成为全球大流行疾病,这给一线医护人员带来了诸多挑战。由于长时间使用个人防护装备(PPE),医护人员极易患上各种皮肤病。最常用的个人防护装备类型是口罩。为有效控制皮肤不良反应,迫切需要一系列预防措施。
本横断面研究在中国浙江省的12家医院开展。邀请医护人员参与网络调查。由两名独立审核人员使用预先设计的数据收集表提取数据,并采用SPSS 20.0进行分析。
共收集到1147份问卷,其中1090份(95.03%)有效并返回。佩戴N95口罩的医护人员出现胸闷、气短和面部湿疹的发生率(分别为41.91%;31.62%)显著高于佩戴医用口罩的医护人员(分别为38.05%,P = 0.010;21.91%,P = 0.012)。佩戴挂耳式口罩的医护人员出现耳痛和压痕的发生率(83.81%)显著高于佩戴系带式口罩的医护人员(61.19%,P < 0.001)。佩戴无区分尺码口罩的医护人员出现耳痛和压痕的发生率(79.88%)显著高于佩戴有区分尺码口罩的医护人员(67.86%,P = 0.031)。随着佩戴口罩时间增加,无不良反应的医护人员发生率显著降低(P < 0.001)。
当每天佩戴口罩时间超过4小时时,不良反应发生率不会随佩戴口罩时长显著增加。医护人员通常每天佩戴口罩超过4小时;因此我们建议佩戴口罩2小时后休息15分钟。本研究结果支持以下结论:系带式口罩和有区分尺码的口罩相较于其他类型医用口罩,不良反应发生率更低。