• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

各州医疗补助扩张状况下,低收入劳动年龄段成年人的医疗保健可及性和心血管危险因素管理

Health Care Access and Management of Cardiovascular Risk Factors Among Working-Age Adults With Low Income by State Medicaid Expansion Status.

机构信息

Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.

出版信息

JAMA Cardiol. 2022 Jul 1;7(7):708-714. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.1282.

DOI:10.1001/jamacardio.2022.1282
PMID:35648424
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9161120/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Medicaid expansion led to gains in insurance coverage among working-age adults with low income. To date, the extent to which disparities in access and cardiovascular care persist for this population in Medicaid nonexpansion and expansion states is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To compare insurance coverage, health care access, and cardiovascular risk factor management between working-age adults (age 18-64 years) with low income in Medicaid nonexpansion and expansion states and between uninsured and insured adults in these states.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study analyzed data on adults aged 18 to 64 years with low income from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System from January 1 to December 31, 2019.

EXPOSURES

State Medicaid expansion and insurance status.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcomes were health care access and monitoring and treatment of cardiovascular risk factors. The estimated adjusted risk difference (RD) in outcomes was estimated to compare adults in Medicaid nonexpansion and expansion states and uninsured and insured individuals in nonexpansion and expansion states.

RESULTS

The weighted study population consisted of 28 028 451 working-age adults with low income, including 10 094 994 (36.0%) in Medicaid nonexpansion states (63.4% female) and 17 933 457 (64.0%) in expansion states (59.2% female). Adults in nonexpansion states had higher uninsurance rates (42.4% [95% CI, 40.2%-44.7%] vs 23.8% [95% CI, 22.8%-24.8%]), were less likely to have a usual source of care (55.4% [95% CI, 53.1%-57.6%] vs 65.4% [95% CI, 64.3%-66.5%]; adjusted RD, -11.4% [95% CI, -13.9% to -8.8%]) or a recent examination (78.9% [95% CI, 77.0%-80.9%] vs 84.4% [95% CI, 83.5%-85.2%]; RD, -6.2% [95% CI, -8.4% to -4.0%]), and were more likely to have deferred care owing to cost (36.1% [95% CI, 34.0%-38.2%] vs 21.8% [95% CI, 20.9%-22.8%]; RD, 14.2% [95% CI, 11.9%-16.6%]) than were those in expansion states. There were no significant differences in cardiovascular risk factor management between these groups. In nonexpansion states, uninsured adults had significantly worse access to care across these measures and were less likely to receive indicated monitoring of cholesterol (72.6% [95% CI, 67.7%-77.4%] vs 93.7%; [95% CI, 92.4%-95.0%]; RD, -17.2% [95% CI, -21.8% to -12.6%]) and hemoglobin A1c (55.2% [95% CI, 40.0%-72.5%] vs 88.5% [95% CI, 79.2%-97.9%]; RD, -25.8% [95% CI, -47.6% to -4.1%]) levels or to receive treatment for hypertension (49.4% [95% CI, 43.3%-55.6%] vs 74.7% [95% CI, 71.5%-78.0%]; RD, -16.3% [95% CI, -23.2% to -9.4%]) and hyperlipidemia (30.2% [95% CI, 23.5%-36.8%] vs 58.7% [95% CI, 53.9%-63.5%]; RD, -19.3% [95% CI, -27.9% to -10.7%]) compared with insured adults. These patterns were similar for uninsured and insured adults in expansion states.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, working-age adults with low income in Medicaid nonexpansion states experienced higher uninsurance rates and worse access to care than did those in expansion states; however, cardiovascular risk factor management was similar and treatment rates were low. In nonexpansion states, uninsured adults were less likely to receive appropriate cardiovascular risk factor management compared with insured adults.

摘要

重要性:医疗补助计划扩大覆盖范围导致了低收入的成年工作者的保险覆盖范围增加。截至目前,对于这些在医疗补助计划未扩大覆盖范围和扩大覆盖范围内的州的人群,在获得医疗服务和心血管护理方面的差距是否持续存在,尚不清楚。

目的:比较低收⼊的成年工作者(18-64 岁)在医疗补助计划未扩大覆盖范围和扩大覆盖范围内的州与在这些州未参保和参保的成年人之间的保险覆盖范围、获得医疗服务的机会以及心血管风险因素管理情况。

设计、地点和参与者:本横断面研究分析了 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日期间,来自行为风险因素监测系统的年龄在 18 至 64 岁的低收⼊成年人的数据。

暴露因素:州医疗补助计划的扩大和保险状况。

主要结局和测量指标:主要结局为获得医疗服务的机会和心血管风险因素的监测和治疗。通过对医疗补助计划未扩大覆盖范围和扩大覆盖范围内的州以及未参保和参保的成年人进行调整,估计了结局的风险差异(RD)。

结果:加权研究人群由 28028451 名低收⼊的成年工作者组成,包括 10094994 名(36.0%)在医疗补助计划未扩大覆盖范围的州的成年人(63.4%为女性)和 17933457 名(64.0%)在扩大覆盖范围的州的成年人(59.2%为女性)。未参保的成年人的未参保率更高(42.4%[95%置信区间[CI],40.2%-44.7%]比 23.8%[95%CI,22.8%-24.8%]),拥有常规医疗服务来源的可能性较低(55.4%[95%CI,53.1%-57.6%]比 65.4%[95%CI,64.3%-66.5%];调整后的 RD,-11.4%[95%CI,-13.9%至-8.8%])或最近进行过体检的可能性较低(78.9%[95%CI,77.0%-80.9%]比 84.4%[95%CI,83.5%-85.2%];RD,-6.2%[95%CI,-8.4%至-4.0%]),并且由于费用而推迟治疗的可能性更高(36.1%[95%CI,34.0%-38.2%]比 21.8%[95%CI,20.9%-22.8%];RD,14.2%[95%CI,11.9%-16.6%])。与扩大覆盖范围的州相比,这些人群之间在心血管风险因素管理方面没有显著差异。在未参保的成年人中,无论在哪个指标上,他们的医疗服务获取机会都明显较差,并且更不可能接受胆固醇(72.6%[95%CI,67.7%-77.4%]比 93.7%;[95%CI,92.4%-95.0%];RD,-17.2%[95%CI,-21.8%至-12.6%])和糖化血红蛋白(55.2%[95%CI,40.0%-72.5%]比 88.5%[95%CI,79.2%-97.9%];RD,-25.8%[95%CI,-47.6%至-4.1%])的监测,也更不可能接受高血压(49.4%[95%CI,43.3%-55.6%]比 74.7%[95%CI,71.5%-78.0%];RD,-16.3%[95%CI,-23.2%至-9.4%])和高血脂(30.2%[95%CI,23.5%-36.8%]比 58.7%[95%CI,53.9%-63.5%];RD,-19.3%[95%CI,-27.9%至-10.7%])的治疗。在扩大覆盖范围的州中,未参保和参保的成年人也存在类似的模式。

结论和相关性:在这项研究中,医疗补助计划未扩大覆盖范围的州的成年低收入工作者的未参保率较高,医疗服务获取机会较差,而在扩大覆盖范围的州的成年人之间则没有显著差异;然而,心血管风险因素管理情况相似,治疗率较低。在未参保的成年人中,与参保成年人相比,他们接受适当的心血管风险因素管理的可能性较低。

相似文献

1
Health Care Access and Management of Cardiovascular Risk Factors Among Working-Age Adults With Low Income by State Medicaid Expansion Status.各州医疗补助扩张状况下,低收入劳动年龄段成年人的医疗保健可及性和心血管危险因素管理
JAMA Cardiol. 2022 Jul 1;7(7):708-714. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.1282.
2
Surveillance for Health Care Access and Health Services Use, Adults Aged 18-64 Years - Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2014.18-64岁成年人医疗保健可及性与医疗服务利用情况监测——美国行为危险因素监测系统,2014年
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017 Feb 24;66(7):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6607a1.
3
Association of State Medicaid Expansion With Quality of Care and Outcomes for Low-Income Patients Hospitalized With Acute Myocardial Infarction.州医疗补助计划扩大覆盖范围与低收住院急性心肌梗死患者的医疗质量和结局的相关性。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Feb 1;4(2):120-127. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.4577.
4
Health Care Access and Cardiovascular Risk Factor Management Among Working-Age US Adults During the Pandemic.大流行期间美国工作年龄成年人的医疗保健获取和心血管风险因素管理。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2023 Dec;16(12):e010516. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010516. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
5
Dental Outcomes After Medicaid Insurance Coverage Expansion Under the Affordable Care Act.平价医疗法案实施后医疗补助保险覆盖范围扩大对牙科治疗效果的影响。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2124144. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.24144.
6
COVID-19-Related Insurance Coverage Changes and Disparities in Access to Care Among Low-Income US Adults in 4 Southern States.COVID-19 相关保险覆盖范围变化与美国南部 4 个州低收入成年人获得医疗服务的差异。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Aug 13;2(8):e212007. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.2007. eCollection 2021 Aug.
7
Changes in Preventative Health Care After Medicaid Expansion.医疗补助扩张后预防性保健的变化。
Med Care. 2020 Jun;58(6):549-556. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001307.
8
Association of State Medicaid Expansion With Rate of Uninsured Hospitalizations for Major Cardiovascular Events, 2009-2014.州医疗补助扩张与主要心血管事件未参保住院率的关联,2009-2014 年。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Aug 3;1(4):e181296. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1296.
9
Improved Health and Insurance Status Among Cigarette Smokers After Medicaid Expansion, 2011-2016.《2011-2016 年医疗补助扩张后,吸烟者健康和保险状况的改善》。
Public Health Rep. 2018 May/Jun;133(3):294-302. doi: 10.1177/0033354918763169. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
10
Associations of Medicaid Expansion With Insurance Coverage, Stage at Diagnosis, and Treatment Among Patients With Genitourinary Malignant Neoplasms.医疗补助扩张计划与泌尿生殖系统恶性肿瘤患者的保险覆盖范围、诊断阶段和治疗的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e217051. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.7051.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Federal and State Laws on Cardiovascular Risk.联邦和州法律对心血管风险的影响。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2025 Aug 7;27(1):121. doi: 10.1007/s11886-025-02277-w.
2
Telehealth-Readiness, Healthcare Access, and Cardiovascular Health in the Deep South: A Spatial Perspective.美国最南部地区的远程医疗准备情况、医疗服务可及性与心血管健康:空间视角
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jun 27;22(7):1020. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22071020.
3
The Houston HeartReach Registry: Recruitment Methods and Current Registry Demographics.休斯顿心脏救助登记处:招募方法及当前登记处人口统计学特征
Tex Heart Inst J. 2025 May 9;52(1):e248447. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-24-8447. eCollection 2025 Jan-Jun.
4
Effects of Medicaid coverage on cardiovascular health outcomes.医疗补助计划覆盖对心血管健康结果的影响。
BMJ. 2024 Sep 23;386:q1807. doi: 10.1136/bmj.q1807.
5
The differences of metabolic profiles, socioeconomic status and diabetic retinopathy in U.S. working-age and elderly adults with diabetes: results from NHANES 1999-2018.美国糖尿病工作年龄和老年成年人的代谢谱、社会经济地位及糖尿病视网膜病变差异:1999 - 2018年美国国家健康与营养检查调查结果
Acta Diabetol. 2025 Jan;62(1):25-34. doi: 10.1007/s00592-024-02328-8. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
6
Cardiovascular hospitalizations and mortality among adults aged 25-64 years in the USA.美国 25-64 岁成年人的心血管住院治疗和死亡率。
Eur Heart J. 2024 Mar 27;45(12):1017-1026. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad772.

本文引用的文献

1
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2021 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.心脏病与中风统计-2021 更新:美国心脏协会报告。
Circulation. 2021 Feb 23;143(8):e254-e743. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000950. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
2
Association of Medicaid Expansion With Rates of Utilization of Cardiovascular Therapies Among Medicaid Beneficiaries Between 2011 and 2018.2011 年至 2018 年间,医疗补助扩张与医疗补助受益人心血管治疗利用率之间的关系。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 Jan;14(1):e007492. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.007492. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
3
Trends in Cardiovascular Disease Prevalence by Income Level in the United States.美国不同收入水平人群中心血管疾病的患病趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2018150. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.18150.
4
Medicaid Expansion and Utilization of Antihyperglycemic Therapies.医疗补助计划的扩大与降糖疗法的使用
Diabetes Care. 2020 Nov;43(11):2684-2690. doi: 10.2337/dc20-0735. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
5
Changes in Preventative Health Care After Medicaid Expansion.医疗补助扩张后预防性保健的变化。
Med Care. 2020 Jun;58(6):549-556. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001307.
6
Temporal Trends in Racial Differences in 30-Day Readmission and Mortality Rates After Acute Myocardial Infarction Among Medicare Beneficiaries.在 Medicare 受益人群中,急性心肌梗死后 30 天再入院率和死亡率的种族差异的时间趋势。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Feb 1;5(2):136-145. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.4845.
7
Lack Of Access To Specialists Associated With Mortality And Preventable Hospitalizations Of Rural Medicare Beneficiaries.农村医疗保险受益人因无法获得专家治疗而导致的死亡率和可预防住院率。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Dec;38(12):1993-2002. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00838.
8
Medicaid Expansion and Health: Assessing the Evidence After 5 Years.医疗补助扩大与健康:五年后的证据评估
JAMA. 2019 Oct 1;322(13):1253-1254. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.12345.
9
Coverage and Access for Americans with Cardiovascular Disease or Risk Factors After the ACA: a Quasi-experimental Study.《ACA 后心血管疾病或风险因素的美国人的覆盖范围和获取:一项准实验研究》。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Sep;34(9):1797-1805. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05108-1. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
10
Association of Medicaid Expansion With Cardiovascular Mortality.医疗补助扩张与心血管死亡率的关联。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Jul 1;4(7):671-679. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.1651.