• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于风险的新冠病毒自我检测以保护我们免受新冠病毒感染(STOP COVID-19)检测方案的依从性设计与初步结果:前瞻性数字研究

Design and Preliminary Findings of Adherence to the Self-Testing for Our Protection From COVID-19 (STOP COVID-19) Risk-Based Testing Protocol: Prospective Digital Study.

作者信息

Herbert Carly, Kheterpal Vik, Suvarna Thejas, Broach John, Marquez Juan Luis, Gerber Ben, Schrader Summer, Nowak Christopher, Harman Emma, Heetderks William, Fahey Nisha, Orvek Elizabeth, Lazar Peter, Ferranto Julia, Noorishirazi Kamran, Valpady Shivakumar, Shi Qiming, Lin Honghuang, Marvel Kathryn, Gibson Laura, Barton Bruce, Lemon Stephenie, Hafer Nathaniel, McManus David, Soni Apurv

机构信息

Program in Digital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.

CareEvolution, Inc, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jun 16;6(6):e38113. doi: 10.2196/38113.

DOI:10.2196/38113
PMID:35649180
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9205422/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Serial testing for SARS-CoV-2 is recommended to reduce spread of the virus; however, little is known about adherence to recommended testing schedules and reporting practices to health departments.

OBJECTIVE

The Self-Testing for Our Protection from COVID-19 (STOP COVID-19) study aims to examine adherence to a risk-based COVID-19 testing strategy using rapid antigen tests and reporting of test results to health departments.

METHODS

STOP COVID-19 is a 12-week digital study, facilitated using a smartphone app for testing assistance and reporting. We are recruiting 20,000 participants throughout the United States. Participants are stratified into high- and low-risk groups based on history of COVID-19 infection and vaccination status. High-risk participants are instructed to perform twice-weekly testing for COVID-19 using rapid antigen tests, while low-risk participants test only in the case of symptoms or exposure to COVID-19. All participants complete COVID-19 surveillance surveys, and rapid antigen results are recorded within the smartphone app. Primary outcomes include participant adherence to a risk-based serial testing protocol and percentage of rapid tests reported to health departments.

RESULTS

As of February 2022, 3496 participants have enrolled, including 1083 high-risk participants. Out of 13,730 tests completed, participants have reported 13,480 (98.18%, 95% CI 97.9%-98.4%) results to state public health departments with full personal identifying information or anonymously. Among 622 high-risk participants who finished the study period, 35.9% showed high adherence to the study testing protocol. Participants with high adherence reported a higher percentage of test results to the state health department with full identifying information than those in the moderate- or low-adherence groups (high: 71.7%, 95% CI 70.3%-73.1%; moderate: 68.3%, 95% CI 66.0%-70.5%; low: 63.1%, 59.5%-66.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary results from the STOP COVID-19 study provide important insights into rapid antigen test reporting and usage, and can thus inform the use of rapid testing interventions for COVID-19 surveillance.

摘要

背景

建议对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)进行系列检测以减少病毒传播;然而,对于遵守推荐的检测时间表以及向卫生部门报告检测结果的情况知之甚少。

目的

“自我检测以预防新冠病毒(STOP COVID-19)”研究旨在调查使用快速抗原检测对基于风险的新冠病毒检测策略的遵守情况以及向卫生部门报告检测结果的情况。

方法

“STOP COVID-19”是一项为期12周的数字研究,通过一款智能手机应用程序协助检测和报告。我们正在美国招募20000名参与者。参与者根据新冠病毒感染史和疫苗接种状况分为高风险组和低风险组。高风险参与者被要求使用快速抗原检测每周进行两次新冠病毒检测,而低风险参与者仅在出现症状或接触新冠病毒时进行检测。所有参与者都要完成新冠病毒监测调查,快速抗原检测结果记录在智能手机应用程序中。主要结果包括参与者对基于风险的系列检测方案的遵守情况以及向卫生部门报告的快速检测的百分比。

结果

截至2022年2月,已有3496名参与者登记,其中包括1083名高风险参与者。在完成的13730次检测中,参与者已向州公共卫生部门报告了13480次(98.18%,95%置信区间97.9%-98.4%)结果,提供了完整的个人身份信息或匿名报告。在完成研究期的622名高风险参与者中,35.9%对研究检测方案表现出高度遵守。与中度或低度遵守组相比,高度遵守的参与者向州卫生部门报告的带有完整身份信息的检测结果百分比更高(高度:71.7%,95%置信区间70.3%-73.1%;中度:68.3%,95%置信区间66.0%-70.5%;低度:63.1%,59.5%-66.6%)。

结论

“STOP COVID-19”研究的初步结果为快速抗原检测报告和使用提供了重要见解,从而可为新冠病毒监测中快速检测干预措施的使用提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/051e/9205422/22be59d91bb8/formative_v6i6e38113_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/051e/9205422/79a287870901/formative_v6i6e38113_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/051e/9205422/22be59d91bb8/formative_v6i6e38113_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/051e/9205422/79a287870901/formative_v6i6e38113_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/051e/9205422/22be59d91bb8/formative_v6i6e38113_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Design and Preliminary Findings of Adherence to the Self-Testing for Our Protection From COVID-19 (STOP COVID-19) Risk-Based Testing Protocol: Prospective Digital Study.基于风险的新冠病毒自我检测以保护我们免受新冠病毒感染(STOP COVID-19)检测方案的依从性设计与初步结果:前瞻性数字研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jun 16;6(6):e38113. doi: 10.2196/38113.
2
Feasibility of At-Home Serial Testing Using Over-the-Counter SARS-CoV-2 Tests With a Digital Smartphone App for Assistance: Longitudinal Cohort Study.使用非处方SARS-CoV-2检测试剂盒并借助数字智能手机应用程序进行居家连续检测的可行性:纵向队列研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Oct 18;6(10):e35426. doi: 10.2196/35426.
3
Virtualized clinical studies to assess the natural history and impact of gut microbiome modulation in non-hospitalized patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 a randomized, open-label, prospective study with a parallel group study evaluating the physiologic effects of KB109 on gut microbiota structure and function: a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled study.用于评估非住院轻中度 COVID-19 患者肠道微生物组调节的自然史和影响的虚拟化临床研究:一项随机、开放标签、前瞻性研究,平行组研究评估 KB109 对肠道微生物组结构和功能的生理影响:一项随机对照研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Apr 2;22(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05157-0.
4
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.
5
Use of a Digital Assistant to Report COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Self-test Results to Health Departments in 6 US Communities.数字助理在向美国 6 个社区的卫生部门报告 COVID-19 快速抗原自我检测结果中的应用。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2228885. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.28885.
6
If you build it, will they use it? Use of a Digital Assistant for Self-Reporting of COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test Results during Large Nationwide Community Testing Initiative.如果你构建了它,他们会使用吗?在全国范围内的大型社区检测倡议中使用数字助手进行新冠病毒快速抗原检测结果的自我报告。
medRxiv. 2022 Apr 1:2022.03.31.22273242. doi: 10.1101/2022.03.31.22273242.
7
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (inactivated, Vero cell): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项评估 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗(灭活,Vero 细胞)有效性和安全性的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照 III 期临床试验:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Apr 13;22(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05180-1.
8
Detection of Spatiotemporal Clusters of COVID-19-Associated Symptoms and Prevention Using a Participatory Surveillance App: Protocol for the @choum Study.使用参与式监测应用程序检测新冠病毒相关症状的时空聚集情况及预防措施:@choum研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Oct 6;10(10):e30444. doi: 10.2196/30444.
9
A mixed methods study evaluating acceptability of a daily COVID-19 testing regimen with a mobile-app connected, at-home, rapid antigen test: Implications for current and future pandemics.一项混合方法研究评估了使用移动应用程序连接的家庭快速抗原检测进行日常 COVID-19 检测方案的可接受性:对当前和未来大流行的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 8;17(8):e0267766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267766. eCollection 2022.
10
Controlled, double-blind, randomized trial to assess the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine chemoprophylaxis in SARS CoV2 infection in healthcare personnel in the hospital setting: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.在医院环境中评估羟氯喹化学预防 SARS-CoV2 感染在医护人员中的疗效和安全性的对照、双盲、随机试验:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Jun 3;21(1):472. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04400-4.

引用本文的文献

1
On the impact of mass screening for SARS-CoV-2 through self-testing in Greece.关于希腊通过自我检测进行 SARS-CoV-2 大规模筛查的影响。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 6;12:1352238. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1352238. eCollection 2024.
2
Persistent False Positive Covid-19 Rapid Antigen Tests.新冠病毒快速抗原检测持续出现假阳性结果。
N Engl J Med. 2024 Feb 22;390(8):764-765. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2313517.
3
Self-tests for COVID-19: What is the evidence? A living systematic review and meta-analysis (2020-2023).新冠病毒自我检测:证据有哪些?一项实时系统评价与荟萃分析(2020 - 2023年)

本文引用的文献

1
A National Strategy for the "New Normal" of Life With COVID.应对新冠疫情下“新常态”生活的国家战略。
JAMA. 2022 Jan 18;327(3):211-212. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.24282.
2
Clusters of COVID-19 protective and risky behaviors and their associations with pandemic, socio-demographic, and mental health factors in the United States.美国新冠肺炎防护和风险行为集群及其与疫情、社会人口统计学和心理健康因素的关联
Prev Med Rep. 2022 Feb;25:101671. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101671. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
3
Monitoring Incidence of COVID-19 Cases, Hospitalizations, and Deaths, by Vaccination Status - 13 U.S. Jurisdictions, April 4-July 17, 2021.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Feb 7;4(2):e0002336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002336. eCollection 2024.
4
Feasibility of At-Home Serial Testing Using Over-the-Counter SARS-CoV-2 Tests With a Digital Smartphone App for Assistance: Longitudinal Cohort Study.使用非处方SARS-CoV-2检测试剂盒并借助数字智能手机应用程序进行居家连续检测的可行性:纵向队列研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Oct 18;6(10):e35426. doi: 10.2196/35426.
按疫苗接种状况监测2021年4月4日至7月17日美国13个司法管辖区的新冠病毒疾病病例、住院情况和死亡情况
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Sep 17;70(37):1284-1290. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7037e1.
4
Perceptions on undertaking regular asymptomatic self-testing for COVID-19 using lateral flow tests: a qualitative study of university students and staff.使用侧向流动检测进行定期无症状自我 COVID-19 检测的看法:对大学生和教职员工的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 2;11(9):e053850. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053850.
5
Antigen Testing Every 3 Days Is Highly Sensitive for SARS-CoV-2.每3天进行一次抗原检测对新冠病毒具有高度敏感性。
JAMA. 2021 Aug 10;326(6):473. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.12620.
6
Guidance for Implementing COVID-19 Prevention Strategies in the Context of Varying Community Transmission Levels and Vaccination Coverage.不同社区传播水平和疫苗接种率下实施 COVID-19 预防策略指南。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Jul 27;70(30):1044-1047. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7030e2.
7
Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine trust and hesitancy among adults with chronic conditions.慢性病成年患者中与新冠疫苗信任和犹豫相关的因素。
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Dec;24:101484. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101484. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
8
The RADx Tech Clinical Studies Core: A Model for Academic Based Clinical Studies.RADx技术临床研究核心:基于学术的临床研究模式。
IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol. 2021 Apr 28;2:152-157. doi: 10.1109/OJEMB.2021.3070830. eCollection 2021.
9
Longitudinal Assessment of Diagnostic Test Performance Over the Course of Acute SARS-CoV-2 Infection.急性 SARS-CoV-2 感染过程中诊断试验性能的纵向评估。
J Infect Dis. 2021 Sep 17;224(6):976-982. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiab337.
10
Trust in government regarding COVID-19 and its associations with preventive health behaviour and prosocial behaviour during the pandemic: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study.民众对政府在 COVID-19 方面的信任及其与大流行期间预防保健行为和亲社会行为的关系:一项横断面和纵向研究。
Psychol Med. 2023 Jan;53(1):149-159. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721001306. Epub 2021 Mar 26.