• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估黎巴嫩卫生系统应对 COVID-19 大流行的治理和准备情况:一项定性研究。

Evaluating the governance and preparedness of the Lebanese health system for the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.

机构信息

Higher Institute of Public Health, Saint-Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.

World Health Organization Country Office for Lebanon, Beirut, Lebanon.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 1;12(6):e058622. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058622.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058622
PMID:35649616
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9160591/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the capacities and governance of Lebanon's health system throughout the response to the COVID-19 pandemic until August 2020.

DESIGN

A qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews.

SETTING

Lebanon, February-August 2020.

PARTICIPANTS

Selected participants were directly or indirectly involved in the national or organisational response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Lebanon.

RESULTS

A total of 41 participants were included in the study. 'Hardware' capacities of the system were found to be responsive yet deeply influenced by the challenging national context. The health workforce showed high levels of resilience, despite the shortage of medical staff and gaps in training at the early stages of the pandemic. The system infrastructure, medical supplies and testing capacities were sufficient, but the reluctance of the private sector in care provision and gaps in reimbursement of COVID-19 care by many health funding schemes were the main concerns. Moreover, the public health surveillance system was overwhelmed a few months after the start of the pandemic. As for the system 'software', there were attempts for a participatory governance mechanism, but the actual decision-making process was challenging with limited cooperation and strategic vision, resulting in decreased trust and increased confusion among communities. Moreover, the power imbalance between health actors and other stakeholders affected decision-making dynamics and the uptake of scientific evidence in policy-making.

CONCLUSIONS

Interventions adopting a centralised and reactive approach were prominent in Lebanon's response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Better public governance and different reforms are needed to strengthen the health system preparedness and capacities to face future health security threats.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估黎巴嫩卫生系统在应对 COVID-19 大流行直至 2020 年 8 月期间的能力和治理情况。

设计

基于半结构式访谈的定性研究。

地点

黎巴嫩,2020 年 2 月至 8 月。

参与者

选择的参与者直接或间接地参与了黎巴嫩 COVID-19 大流行的国家或组织应对工作。

结果

共有 41 名参与者纳入研究。该系统的“硬件”能力表现出响应能力,但深受具有挑战性的国家背景的影响。卫生工作者表现出了很高的适应力,尽管在大流行的早期阶段医疗人员短缺且培训存在差距。系统基础设施、医疗用品和检测能力充足,但私营部门在提供护理方面的不情愿以及许多卫生筹资计划对 COVID-19 护理的报销不足是主要关注点。此外,公共卫生监测系统在大流行开始几个月后就不堪重负。至于系统的“软件”,虽然有尝试采用参与式治理机制,但实际的决策过程具有挑战性,合作和战略眼光有限,导致社区之间的信任度降低和混乱加剧。此外,卫生行为体和其他利益相关者之间的权力不平衡影响了决策动态和科学证据在决策中的应用。

结论

在黎巴嫩应对 COVID-19 大流行期间,采取集中和被动方法的干预措施较为突出。需要更好的公共治理和不同的改革,以加强卫生系统的准备和应对未来卫生安全威胁的能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4166/9160591/b2c67895c861/bmjopen-2021-058622f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4166/9160591/b2c67895c861/bmjopen-2021-058622f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4166/9160591/b2c67895c861/bmjopen-2021-058622f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the governance and preparedness of the Lebanese health system for the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.评估黎巴嫩卫生系统应对 COVID-19 大流行的治理和准备情况:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 1;12(6):e058622. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058622.
2
Toward better pandemic governance and preparedness: South Korea's whole-of-nation approach to COVID-19.迈向更好的大流行治理和防范:韩国应对 COVID-19 的全民方法。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 6;24(1):2126. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19655-8.
3
COVID-19 Policy Response: Perspectives of Key Stakeholders in Mexico's Health System and Implications for Resilience.COVID-19政策应对:墨西哥卫生系统关键利益相关者的观点及其对恢复力的影响
Arch Med Res. 2025 Feb;56(2):103097. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2024.103097. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
4
The use of evidence to guide decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic: divergent perspectives from a qualitative case study in British Columbia, Canada.利用证据在 COVID-19 大流行期间指导决策:来自加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的定性案例研究的不同观点。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Jun 3;22(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01146-2.
5
Intersecting factors of disadvantage and discrimination and their effect on daily life during the coronavirus pandemic: the CICADA-ME mixed-methods study.新冠疫情期间不利因素与歧视的交叉影响及其对日常生活的作用:CICADA-ME混合方法研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Feb;13(2):1-185. doi: 10.3310/KYTF4381.
6
National and subnational governance and decision-making processes during the COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria: an empirical analysis.尼日利亚 COVID-19 大流行期间的国家和次国家治理和决策过程:一项实证分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Sep;8(9). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012965.
7
Health and tuberculosis systems resilience, the role of the private sector and pandemic preparedness: insights from a cross-country qualitative study with policy-makers in India, Indonesia and Nigeria.卫生与结核病系统的韧性、私营部门的作用及大流行防范:来自对印度、印度尼西亚和尼日利亚政策制定者的跨国定性研究的见解
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Jan 20;10(1):e016180. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016180.
8
Governance, policy, and health systems responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand: a qualitative study.泰国应对 COVID-19 大流行的治理、政策和卫生系统反应:一项定性研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 22;12:1250192. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1250192. eCollection 2024.
9
Global Health System Resilience during Encounters with Stressors - Lessons Learnt from Cancer Services during the COVID-19 Pandemic.全球卫生系统应对压力源的韧性 - 从 COVID-19 大流行期间的癌症服务中吸取的经验教训。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2023 Apr;35(4):e289-e300. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.01.004. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
10
Everyday capabilities were a path to resilience during COVID-19: a case study of five countries.日常能力是应对 COVID-19 期间韧性的途径:五个国家的案例研究。
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Feb 13;38(2):192-204. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czac085.

引用本文的文献

1
COVID-19 herd immunity in Lebanon: Challenges and prospects.黎巴嫩的新冠病毒群体免疫:挑战与前景
Public Health Chall. 2024 Mar 20;3(1):e167. doi: 10.1002/puh2.167. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
How has the concept of health system software been used in health policy and systems research? A scoping review.健康系统软件的概念在卫生政策与系统研究中是如何被运用的?一项范围综述。
Health Policy Plan. 2025 Mar 7;40(3):391-408. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaf001.
3
Negative effects of high public debt on health systems facing pandemic crisis: Lessons from COVID-19 in Europe to prepare for future emergencies.

本文引用的文献

1
Preparedness of countries to face COVID-19 pandemic crisis: Strategic positioning and factors supporting effective strategies of prevention of pandemic threats.国家应对 COVID-19 大流行危机的准备情况:战略定位和支持预防大流行威胁的有效策略的因素。
Environ Res. 2022 Jan;203:111678. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111678. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
2
COVID-19 Response in Thailand and Its Implications on Future Preparedness.泰国的 COVID-19 应对措施及其对未来准备工作的启示。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 26;18(3):1089. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031089.
3
Assessing COVID-19 through the lens of health systems' preparedness: time for a change.
高公共债务对面临大流行危机的卫生系统的负面影响:欧洲新冠疫情的教训,为未来紧急情况做准备。
AIMS Public Health. 2024 Apr 11;11(2):477-498. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024024. eCollection 2024.
4
Assessing quality of critical care during an ongoing health emergency-a novel approach to evaluate quality of care at Lebanese public ICUs during COVID-19.评估持续卫生紧急情况下的重症监护质量-一种评估 COVID-19 期间黎巴嫩公立医院 ICU 护理质量的新方法。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2024 Apr 30;36(2). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzae028.
5
Evaluating the metropolitan public health preparedness for pandemics using entropy-TOPSIS-IF.运用熵权-TOPSIS-IF 法评价大都市的大流行疾病公共卫生准备情况。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 7;12:1339611. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1339611. eCollection 2024.
6
Exodus of Lebanese doctors in times of crisis: a qualitative study.危机时期黎巴嫩医生的外流:一项定性研究。
Front Health Serv. 2023 Oct 30;3:1240052. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1240052. eCollection 2023.
7
Multisectoral action towards sustainable development goal 3.d and building health systems resilience during and beyond COVID-19: Findings from an INTOSAI development initiative and World Health Organization collaboration.多部门行动以实现可持续发展目标 3.d 并在 COVID-19 期间和之后增强卫生系统的弹性:来自国际审计组织发展倡议和世界卫生组织合作的发现。
Front Public Health. 2023 May 19;11:1104669. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1104669. eCollection 2023.
从卫生系统准备情况的角度评估 COVID-19:是时候做出改变了。
Global Health. 2020 Nov 19;16(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12992-020-00645-5.
4
Lebanese Healthcare System: How Will the Aftermath Look?黎巴嫩医疗体系:灾后状况会如何?
Cureus. 2020 Sep 6;12(9):e10270. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10270.
5
Health system resilience in managing the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons from Singapore.管理 COVID-19 大流行的卫生系统弹性:来自新加坡的经验教训。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Sep;5(9). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003317.
6
Swedish policy analysis for Covid-19.瑞典针对新冠疫情的政策分析。
Health Policy Technol. 2020 Dec;9(4):598-612. doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.08.009. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
7
Lebanon faces humanitarian emergency after blast.爆炸后黎巴嫩面临人道主义紧急情况。
Lancet. 2020 Aug 15;396(10249):456. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31750-5.
8
COVID-19 Pandemic: An Insult Over Injury for Lebanon.新冠疫情:黎巴嫩雪上加霜。
J Community Health. 2021 Jun;46(3):487-493. doi: 10.1007/s10900-020-00884-y.
9
Responding to COVID-19: What's the Problem?应对 COVID-19:问题是什么?
J Urban Health. 2020 Aug;97(4):583-587. doi: 10.1007/s11524-020-00456-4.
10
Learning health systems: an empowering agenda for low-income and middle-income countries.学习型卫生系统:低收入和中等收入国家的一项赋权议程。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):476-477. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)33134-4.