• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

首席医师服务下的腹股沟疝修补术:住院医师委托教育的安全模式。

Inguinal Hernia Repairs on the Chief's Service: A Safe Educational Model in Resident Entrustment.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

Department of Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

出版信息

J Surg Educ. 2022 Sep-Oct;79(5):1246-1252. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.05.010. Epub 2022 May 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.05.010
PMID:35649957
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that a Chief Resident Service educational model provides safe care for patients compared to that received on standard academic services where rotating residents adopt the practices and preferences of their attending.

DESIGN

We retrospectively identified patients undergoing inguinal hernia repairs from July 2016 through June 2019 and matched Chief's service patients to standard academic service patients 1:1 on CPT, sex and age. We compared patient characteristics, recurrence rates, outcomes and complications.

SETTING

Tertiary care center, single institution.

PARTICIPANTS

Overall, 77 patients undergoing inguinal hernia repairs (66% open and 34% laparoscopic) on the Chief's service matched successfully to 77 standard academic service patients during the study period.

RESULTS

Age, BMI and ASA were similar between the services, but Chief's service patients were less likely to be current smokers (1.3% vs. 24.7%) and more likely to be former smokers (59.7% vs. 26.0%) than standard academic service patients (p < 0.01). Patients presenting with incarcerated hernias (5.2% vs. 9.1%), recurrent (10.4% vs. 5.2%) and bilateral hernias (19.5% vs. 10.4%) were similar between the Chief's service and standard academic services, respectively (all p > 0.05). Operative times were longer for the Chief's service for open (123 min vs. 67, p < 0.01) and laparoscopic (112 min vs. 79, p = 0.02) repairs. Recurrence rates (6.5% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.47) and complications including infection, seroma or hematoma requiring evacuation and need for reoperation were similarly low (p > 0.05) between the Chief's and standard academic services, respectively. Despite low complication rates, Chief's service patients were more likely to present to the ED post-op (14.3% vs. 1.3%; p = 0.001), but readmission rates were similarly low (2.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.09).

CONCLUSIONS

Providing general surgery chief residents with a supervised opportunity to direct, plan and provide surgical care in clinic and the operating room, as a transition to independent practice following graduation, is safe for patients presenting with inguinal hernias. Concerns about patient safety should not be a barrier to maximizing entrustment for the evaluation and operative management of select core general surgery diagnoses and operations.

摘要

目的

我们假设住院总医师服务教育模式为患者提供的安全保障与标准学术服务相当,而后者中轮转住院医师采用主治医生的实践和偏好。

设计

我们回顾性地确定了 2016 年 7 月至 2019 年 6 月间接受腹股沟疝修补术的患者,并按照 CPT、性别和年龄将住院总医师服务的患者与标准学术服务的患者 1:1 匹配。我们比较了患者特征、复发率、结果和并发症。

设置

三级医疗中心,单机构。

参与者

总体而言,在研究期间,共有 77 名在住院总医师服务下接受腹股沟疝修补术的患者(66%为开放式,34%为腹腔镜式)成功与 77 名标准学术服务患者相匹配。

结果

服务间的年龄、BMI 和 ASA 相似,但与标准学术服务患者相比,住院总医师服务患者中当前吸烟者(1.3% vs. 24.7%)较少,而前吸烟者(59.7% vs. 26.0%)较多(p<0.01)。嵌顿疝(5.2% vs. 9.1%)、复发(10.4% vs. 5.2%)和双侧疝(19.5% vs. 10.4%)的患者在住院总医师服务和标准学术服务间相似(均 p>0.05)。开放手术(123 分钟 vs. 67 分钟,p<0.01)和腹腔镜手术(112 分钟 vs. 79 分钟,p=0.02)的手术时间在住院总医师服务中更长。复发率(6.5% vs. 3.9%,p=0.47)和并发症发生率,包括感染、血清肿或血肿需要引流和需要再次手术,在住院总医师服务和标准学术服务间相似(均 p>0.05)。尽管并发症发生率较低,但住院总医师服务患者术后更有可能到急诊就诊(14.3% vs. 1.3%;p=0.001),但再入院率相似(2.6% vs. 0%,p=0.09)。

结论

为即将毕业的住院总医师提供监督机会,使其在诊所和手术室中直接、计划和提供手术护理,作为毕业后独立执业的过渡,对患有腹股沟疝的患者是安全的。对于患者安全的担忧不应该成为限制对特定核心普通外科诊断和手术进行评估和手术管理的委托权限的障碍。

相似文献

1
Inguinal Hernia Repairs on the Chief's Service: A Safe Educational Model in Resident Entrustment.首席医师服务下的腹股沟疝修补术:住院医师委托教育的安全模式。
J Surg Educ. 2022 Sep-Oct;79(5):1246-1252. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.05.010. Epub 2022 May 29.
2
Chief Resident Indirect Supervision in Training Safety Study: Is a Chief Resident General Surgery Service Safe for Patients?住院总医师间接监督培训安全研究:普通外科住院总医师服务对患者安全吗?
J Surg Educ. 2021 Nov-Dec;78(6):e145-e153. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.07.005. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
3
Is unilateral laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair a job half done? The case for bilateral repair.单侧腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术是做了一半的工作吗?双侧修补的理由。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Jul;24(7):1737-45. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0841-4. Epub 2010 Feb 5.
4
A modified laparoscopic hernioplasty (TAPP) is the standard procedure for inguinal and femoral hernias: a retrospective 17-year analysis with 1,123 hernia repairs.改良腹腔镜疝修补术(TAPP)是腹股沟疝和股疝的标准手术:一项对1123例疝修补术的17年回顾性分析。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Feb;28(2):671-82. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3208-9. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
5
Outcomes Following Cholecystectomy on a Service Designed to Maximize Chief Resident Entrustment.旨在最大限度地赋予住院总医师委托权限的服务下胆囊切除术的结果。
J Surg Res. 2021 Aug;264:474-480. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.02.042. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
6
Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.用于腹股沟疝和股疝修补的补片与非补片对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 13;9(9):CD011517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2.
7
Comparison of post-operative outcomes of large direct inguinal hernia repairs based on operative approach (open vs. laparoscopic vs. robotic) using the ACHQC (Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative) database.利用ACHQC(腹部核心健康质量协作组织)数据库,基于手术方式(开放手术、腹腔镜手术与机器人手术)对大型直接腹股沟疝修补术后结果进行比较。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Apr;37(4):2923-2931. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09805-7. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
8
Robotic Inguinal Hernias Performed at a Community Hospital: a Case Series of 292 Patients.机器人腹股沟疝在社区医院的手术:292 例患者的病例系列。
Surg Technol Int. 2021 Oct 26;39:197-203. doi: 10.52198/21.STI.39.HR1510.
9
Laparoscopic transperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty (TAPP) after radical open retropubic prostatectomy: special features and clinical outcomes.腹腔镜经腹腔腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)在根治性开放耻骨后前列腺切除术之后的应用:特殊特征和临床结局。
Hernia. 2019 Apr;23(2):281-286. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1846-5. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
10
Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia: retrospective comparison of TEP and TAPP procedures in a tertiary referral center.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:三级转诊中心 TEP 和 TAPP 手术的回顾性比较。
Minerva Chir. 2020 Oct;75(5):279-285. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08518-1.