Wang Aolin, Zhao Yanan, Zhang Meihui, Yuan Junhai, Liu Wei, Fan Jieru, Hu Xiaoping, Zhou Yilin
State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas and College of Plant Protection, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China.
Front Plant Sci. 2022 May 16;13:864192. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.864192. eCollection 2022.
Effective strategies to reduce the occurrence of wheat powdery mildew include the use of resistant varieties and application of fungicides. However, most studies rarely focus on the quantitative value of fungicide reduction using resistant varieties. To explore how the fungicides performed on different resistant wheat varieties to powdery mildew, field experiments were conducted during wheat growing seasons in 2018/19 and 2019/20 to investigate the control efficacies of enostroburin⋅epoxiconazole 18% SC and triadimefon 20% EC to wheat powdery mildew on a highly resistant wheat variety ("Baofeng104") and a highly susceptible wheat variety ("Jingshuang16"). The analyses of variance on control efficacies showed that the control efficacies of enostroburin⋅epoxiconazole 18% SC to wheat powdery mildew were mostly significantly higher than triadimefon 20% EC under the same conditions (i.e., varieties, dosages). However, both fungicide and variety resistance made variabilities in the mildew disease index and played a significant role in mildew management. Particularly, the variety resistance made the greatest contribution in mildew-reducing, and the disease index could significantly be reduced on the highly resistant variety even in the absence of fungicide treatment. The control efficacies to mildew on the highly susceptible variety mainly depended on the high efficiency of fungicides whereas the highly resistant variety were mainly by virtue of variety resistance through the comparative analyses of linear regression models. Furthermore, the random-coefficient regression models and quantile models quantificationally expounded that the relationships between active ingredient dosage and disease index or control efficacy varied from the effects of variety, fungicide, and year, particular from variety. Thus, a dosage reference table of enostroburin⋅epoxiconazole 18% SC or triadimefon 20% EC for different resistant wheat varieties were provided; it would be helpful for users to formulate an appropriate dosage of fungicide on mildew management in the field and avoid overusing or superfluous application. Further study needs to consider the effects of fungicide reduction on wheat yields, only then the maximum-economic benefits on mildew management can be determined.
减少小麦白粉病发生的有效策略包括使用抗性品种和施用杀菌剂。然而,大多数研究很少关注使用抗性品种时杀菌剂减量的量化值。为了探究杀菌剂在不同抗小麦白粉病品种上的表现,于2018/19年和2019/20年小麦生长季开展田间试验,研究18%烯肟菌酯·戊唑醇悬浮剂和20%三唑酮乳油对高抗小麦品种(“宝丰104”)和高感小麦品种(“京双16”)上小麦白粉病的防治效果。防治效果的方差分析表明,在相同条件下(即品种、剂量),18%烯肟菌酯·戊唑醇悬浮剂对小麦白粉病的防治效果大多显著高于20%三唑酮乳油。然而,杀菌剂和品种抗性均使白粉病病情指数产生变异,且在白粉病防治中发挥重要作用。特别是,品种抗性在减少白粉病方面贡献最大,即使在不进行杀菌剂处理的情况下,高抗品种的病情指数也能显著降低。通过线性回归模型的比较分析,高感品种上对白粉病的防治效果主要取决于杀菌剂的高效性,而高抗品种主要依靠品种抗性。此外,随机系数回归模型和分位数模型定量阐述了有效成分用量与病情指数或防治效果之间的关系因品种、杀菌剂和年份的影响而不同,特别是品种的影响。由此提供了18%烯肟菌酯·戊唑醇悬浮剂或20%三唑酮乳油针对不同抗小麦品种的用量参考表;这将有助于使用者在田间白粉病防治中制定合适的杀菌剂用量,避免过度使用或用药不当。进一步的研究需要考虑杀菌剂减量对小麦产量的影响,只有这样才能确定白粉病防治的最大经济效益。