Katila T, Lock T F, Ely R W, Smith A R
Acta Vet Scand. 1986;27(3):378-87. doi: 10.1186/BF03548152.
The study was designed to determine differences between normal mares and mares with endometrial pathology in the inflammatory response after bacterial challenge. Six normal mares (biopsy category I) and 4 mares with pathological endometrial changes (biopsy category II) were given an intrauterine infusion of β-hemolytic streptococci on the second day of estrus. All mares had a similar kind of inflammatory response after the bacterial inoculation as assessed by rectal and vaginal examinations. There were no significant differences in the amount of discharge, uterine tone, uterine size and cervical relaxation between the groups. Leukocytic response, as determined by endometrial smears and biopsies, was of the same magnitude in both groups. Two mares from the pathological group were not able to eliminate the infection, but had vaginal discharge and bacteriologically positive uterine swabs until the end of the experiment. It is concluded that the inability of some mares to clear uterine infections cannot be explained by a deficient inflammatory response.
该研究旨在确定正常母马与患有子宫内膜病变的母马在细菌攻击后的炎症反应差异。在发情期第二天,对6匹正常母马(活检类别I)和4匹有子宫内膜病理变化的母马(活检类别II)进行子宫内注入β-溶血性链球菌。通过直肠和阴道检查评估,所有母马在细菌接种后都有相似的炎症反应。两组之间在分泌物量、子宫张力、子宫大小和宫颈松弛度方面没有显著差异。通过子宫内膜涂片和活检确定的白细胞反应在两组中程度相同。病理组的两匹母马无法清除感染,直到实验结束时仍有阴道分泌物且子宫拭子细菌学检查呈阳性。得出的结论是,一些母马无法清除子宫感染不能用炎症反应不足来解释。