Suppr超能文献

复发缓解型多发性硬化症的定量磁化传递成像:系统评价与荟萃分析。

Quantitative magnetization transfer imaging in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

York Elizabeth N, Thrippleton Michael J, Meijboom Rozanna, Hunt David P J, Waldman Adam D

机构信息

Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

UK Dementia Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Brain Commun. 2022 Apr 4;4(2):fcac088. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcac088. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Myelin-sensitive MRI such as magnetization transfer imaging has been widely used in multiple sclerosis. The influence of methodology and differences in disease subtype on imaging findings is, however, not well established. Here, we systematically review magnetization transfer brain imaging findings in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. We examine how methodological differences, disease effects and their interaction influence magnetization transfer imaging measures. Articles published before 06/01/2021 were retrieved from online databases (PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science) with search terms including 'magnetization transfer' and 'brain' for systematic review, according to a pre-defined protocol. Only studies that used human quantitative magnetization transfer imaging in adults with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (with or without healthy controls) were included. Additional data from relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis subjects acquired in other studies comprising mixed disease subtypes were included in meta-analyses. Data including sample size, MRI acquisition protocol parameters, treatments and clinical findings were extracted and qualitatively synthesized. Where possible, effect sizes were calculated for meta-analyses to determine magnetization transfer (i) differences between patients and healthy controls; (ii) longitudinal change and (iii) relationships with clinical disability in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Eighty-six studies met inclusion criteria. MRI acquisition parameters varied widely, and were also underreported. The majority of studies examined the magnetization transfer ratio in white matter, but magnetization transfer metrics, brain regions examined and results were heterogeneous. The analysis demonstrated a risk of bias due to selective reporting and small sample sizes. The pooled random-effects meta-analysis across all brain compartments revealed magnetization transfer ratio was 1.17 per cent units (95% CI -1.42 to -0.91) lower in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis than healthy controls (-value: -8.99, < 0.001, 46 studies). Linear mixed-model analysis did not show a significant longitudinal change in magnetization transfer ratio across all brain regions [ = 0.12 (-0.56 to 0.80), -value = 0.35, = 0.724, 14 studies] or normal-appearing white matter alone [ = 0.037 (-0.14 to 0.22), -value = 0.41, = 0.68, eight studies]. There was a significant negative association between the magnetization transfer ratio and clinical disability, as assessed by the Expanded Disability Status Scale [ = -0.32 (95% CI -0.46 to -0.17); -value = -4.33, < 0.001, 13 studies]. Evidence suggests that magnetization transfer imaging metrics are sensitive to pathological brain changes in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, although effect sizes were small in comparison to inter-study variability. Recommendations include: better harmonized magnetization transfer acquisition protocols with detailed methodological reporting standards; larger, well-phenotyped cohorts, including healthy controls; and, further exploration of techniques such as magnetization transfer saturation or inhomogeneous magnetization transfer ratio.

摘要

诸如磁化传递成像等对髓鞘敏感的磁共振成像已在多发性硬化症中广泛应用。然而,方法学的影响以及疾病亚型差异对成像结果的影响尚未完全明确。在此,我们系统回顾复发缓解型多发性硬化症中磁化传递脑成像的研究结果。我们研究方法学差异、疾病影响及其相互作用如何影响磁化传递成像测量。根据预先定义的方案,从在线数据库(PubMed、EMBASE和Web of Science)中检索2021年1月6日前发表的文章,搜索词包括“磁化传递”和“脑”以进行系统综述。仅纳入在复发缓解型多发性硬化症成人患者(有或无健康对照)中使用人类定量磁化传递成像的研究。在其他包含混合疾病亚型的研究中获取的复发缓解型多发性硬化症受试者的额外数据纳入荟萃分析。提取包括样本量、磁共振成像采集方案参数、治疗和临床结果的数据并进行定性综合分析。在可能的情况下,计算效应量以进行荟萃分析,以确定复发缓解型多发性硬化症中磁化传递:(i)患者与健康对照之间的差异;(ii)纵向变化;以及(iii)与临床残疾的关系。86项研究符合纳入标准。磁共振成像采集参数差异很大,且报告不足。大多数研究检查了白质中的磁化传递率,但磁化传递指标、检查的脑区和结果存在异质性。分析表明存在因选择性报告和样本量小导致的偏倚风险。对所有脑区进行的汇总随机效应荟萃分析显示,复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者的磁化传递率比健康对照低1.17个百分点(95%置信区间为-1.42至-0.91)(P值:-8.99,P<0.001,46项研究)。线性混合模型分析未显示所有脑区的磁化传递率有显著纵向变化[β = 0.12(-0.56至0.80),P值 = 0.35,F = 0.724,14项研究],单独在正常外观白质中也未显示有显著纵向变化[β = 0.037(-0.14至0.22),P值 = 0.41,F = 0.68,8项研究]。根据扩展残疾状态量表评估,磁化传递率与临床残疾之间存在显著负相关[β = -0.32(95%置信区间为-0.46至-0.17);P值 = -4.33,P<0.001,13项研究]。有证据表明,尽管与研究间变异性相比效应量较小,但磁化传递成像指标对复发缓解型多发性硬化症中的脑病理变化敏感。建议包括:采用更统一的磁化传递采集方案并制定详细的方法学报告标准;纳入健康对照的更大规模、特征明确的队列;以及进一步探索诸如磁化传递饱和度或不均匀磁化传递率等技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b35a/9149789/c0689b46f3b4/fcac088ga1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验