Faculty of Law and Criminology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J Forensic Sci. 2022 Sep;67(5):2122-2129. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.15073. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
We report on a unique Italian criminal case in which a court ruled that a therapist implanted false memories of abuse in a young girl. Using therapeutic excerpts, we show that the therapist used a multitude of problematic interventions that are all linked to false memory creation. Specifically, an analysis of the therapeutic excerpts showed that across many sessions, the therapist asked highly suggestive questions to the girl, implying that she was abused by her father. In addition, the girl underwent EMDR techniques that have been associated with memory undermining effects. Our analyses showed that although before treatment the girl did not have any recollection of being abused by her father, she gradually started to remember the abuse and identified the father as her abuser during the therapeutic sessions. Our case report clearly shows the danger of suggestive pressure in a therapeutic context causing patients to form false memories of abuse and supports the need to prevent the therapeutic practice of suggestive techniques.
我们报告了一个独特的意大利刑事案件,法院裁定一名治疗师在一名年轻女孩身上植入了虚假的虐待记忆。使用治疗摘录,我们表明治疗师使用了多种有问题的干预措施,这些措施都与虚假记忆的产生有关。具体来说,对治疗摘录的分析表明,在多次治疗中,治疗师向女孩提出了高度暗示性的问题,暗示她受到了父亲的虐待。此外,女孩还接受了与记忆破坏效应相关的 EMDR 技术。我们的分析表明,尽管在治疗前女孩没有任何被父亲虐待的记忆,但她逐渐开始回忆起这种虐待,并在治疗过程中将父亲确定为施虐者。我们的案例报告清楚地表明了治疗环境中暗示性压力的危险,它会导致患者形成虚假的虐待记忆,并支持需要防止治疗中使用暗示技术。