Suppr超能文献

法院对治疗性诱导的虚假记忆一案作出裁决。

A court ruled case on therapy-induced false memories.

机构信息

Faculty of Law and Criminology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Forensic Sci. 2022 Sep;67(5):2122-2129. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.15073. Epub 2022 Jun 2.

Abstract

We report on a unique Italian criminal case in which a court ruled that a therapist implanted false memories of abuse in a young girl. Using therapeutic excerpts, we show that the therapist used a multitude of problematic interventions that are all linked to false memory creation. Specifically, an analysis of the therapeutic excerpts showed that across many sessions, the therapist asked highly suggestive questions to the girl, implying that she was abused by her father. In addition, the girl underwent EMDR techniques that have been associated with memory undermining effects. Our analyses showed that although before treatment the girl did not have any recollection of being abused by her father, she gradually started to remember the abuse and identified the father as her abuser during the therapeutic sessions. Our case report clearly shows the danger of suggestive pressure in a therapeutic context causing patients to form false memories of abuse and supports the need to prevent the therapeutic practice of suggestive techniques.

摘要

我们报告了一个独特的意大利刑事案件,法院裁定一名治疗师在一名年轻女孩身上植入了虚假的虐待记忆。使用治疗摘录,我们表明治疗师使用了多种有问题的干预措施,这些措施都与虚假记忆的产生有关。具体来说,对治疗摘录的分析表明,在多次治疗中,治疗师向女孩提出了高度暗示性的问题,暗示她受到了父亲的虐待。此外,女孩还接受了与记忆破坏效应相关的 EMDR 技术。我们的分析表明,尽管在治疗前女孩没有任何被父亲虐待的记忆,但她逐渐开始回忆起这种虐待,并在治疗过程中将父亲确定为施虐者。我们的案例报告清楚地表明了治疗环境中暗示性压力的危险,它会导致患者形成虚假的虐待记忆,并支持需要防止治疗中使用暗示技术。

相似文献

1
A court ruled case on therapy-induced false memories.法院对治疗性诱导的虚假记忆一案作出裁决。
J Forensic Sci. 2022 Sep;67(5):2122-2129. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.15073. Epub 2022 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

4
The recovery and retraction of memories of abuse: a scoping review.虐待记忆的恢复与重现:一项范围综述
Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 5;16:1498258. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1498258. eCollection 2025.
5
Evaluating the validity of testimony: The role of the order of evidence.评估证词的有效性:证据顺序的作用。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2024 Nov 21;9:100562. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100562. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
A Case for Translation From the Clinic to the Laboratory.从临床到实验室的翻译案例
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Jul;17(4):1120-1149. doi: 10.1177/17456916211039852. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
4
5
Side effects of induced lateral eye movements during aversive ideation.诱导性侧眼运动在厌恶思维过程中的副作用。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2020 Sep;68:101566. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2020.101566. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
8
Reports of recovered memories of childhood abuse in therapy in France.法国治疗中对童年虐待的记忆恢复的报告。
Memory. 2019 Oct;27(9):1283-1298. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2019.1652654. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
9
Memory editing from science fiction to clinical practice.从科幻小说到临床实践的记忆编辑。
Nature. 2019 Aug;572(7767):43-50. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1433-7. Epub 2019 Jul 31.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验