• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过以公平为中心的领导力发展和跨专业医疗团队来促进健康公平。

Advancing Health Equity Through Equity-Centered Leadership Development with Interprofessional Healthcare Teams.

机构信息

Center for Health Equity Research, Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Dec;37(16):4120-4129. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07529-x. Epub 2022 Jun 3.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-022-07529-x
PMID:35657467
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9165542/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Events of spring 2020-the COVID19 pandemic and re-birth of a social justice movement-have thrown disparities in disease risk, morbidity, and mortality in sharp relief. In response, healthcare organizations have shifted attentions and resources towards equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) issues and initiatives like never before. Focused, proven equity-centered skill and mindset development is needed for healthcare professionals to operationalize these pledges and stated aims.

AIM

This article highlights program evaluation results for this Clinical Scholars National Leadership Institute (CSNLI) specific to EDI. We will show that CSNLI imparts the valuable and essential skills to health professionals that are needed to realize health equity through organizational and system change.

SETTING

Initial cohort of 29 participants in CSNLI, engaging in the program over 3 years through in-person and distance-based learning offerings and activities.

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

The CSNLI is a 3-year, intensive leadership program that centers EDI skill development across personal, interpersonal, organizational, and systems domains through its design, competencies, and curriculum.

PROGRAM EVALUATION

A robust evaluation following the Kirkpatrick Model offers analysis of four data collecting activities related to program participants' EDI learning, behavioral change, and results.

DISCUSSION

Over the course of the program, participants made significant gains in competencies related to equity, diversity, and inclusion. Furthermore, participants demonstrated growth in behavior change and leadership activities in the areas of organizational and system change. Results demonstrate the need to center both leader and leadership development on equity, diversity, and inclusion curriculum to make real change in the US Healthcare System.

摘要

简介

2020 年春季的事件——COVID19 大流行和社会正义运动的复兴——使疾病风险、发病率和死亡率方面的差异变得尤为明显。作为回应,医疗机构前所未有地将注意力和资源转向公平、多样性和包容性(EDI)问题和举措。医疗专业人员需要专注、经过验证的以公平为中心的技能和思维模式发展,才能将这些承诺和既定目标付诸实践。

目的

本文重点介绍了针对 EDI 的国家临床学者领导力研究所(CSNLI)的项目评估结果。我们将展示 CSNLI 为卫生专业人员提供了实现健康公平所需的宝贵和必要技能,通过组织和系统变革来实现健康公平。

背景

CSNLI 的初始学员为 29 人,通过面对面和远程学习课程和活动,在 3 年内参与该计划。

计划描述

CSNLI 是一个为期 3 年的强化领导力计划,通过其设计、能力和课程,将 EDI 技能发展集中在个人、人际、组织和系统领域。

计划评估

遵循柯克帕特里克模型的强大评估提供了与计划参与者 EDI 学习、行为改变和结果相关的四项数据收集活动的分析。

讨论

在计划过程中,参与者在与公平、多样性和包容性相关的能力方面取得了重大进展。此外,参与者在组织和系统变革领域的行为改变和领导力活动方面也取得了发展。结果表明,需要将领导者和领导力发展都集中在公平、多样性和包容性课程上,以在美国医疗保健系统中实现真正的变革。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b6d/9708959/ff59458192e3/11606_2022_7529_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b6d/9708959/788ca1df8676/11606_2022_7529_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b6d/9708959/ff59458192e3/11606_2022_7529_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b6d/9708959/788ca1df8676/11606_2022_7529_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b6d/9708959/ff59458192e3/11606_2022_7529_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Advancing Health Equity Through Equity-Centered Leadership Development with Interprofessional Healthcare Teams.通过以公平为中心的领导力发展和跨专业医疗团队来促进健康公平。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Dec;37(16):4120-4129. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07529-x. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
2
Leadership Development to Advance Health Equity: An Equity-Centered Leadership Framework.领导力发展以促进健康公平:以公平为中心的领导力框架。
Acad Med. 2022 Dec 1;97(12):1746-1752. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004851. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
3
Evaluating Leadership Development Competencies of Clinicians to Build Health Equity in America.评估临床医生的领导力发展能力,以建设美国的健康公平。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2024;44(2):90-96. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000526. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
4
Using a most significant change approach to evaluate learner-centric outcomes of clinical scholars leadership training program.采用最显著变化法评估以学习者为中心的临床学者领导力培训项目的成果。
Eval Program Plann. 2022 Oct;94:102141. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102141. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
5
Immersive Leadership Training for Physicians: Comparing Retrospective Pre- and Post-Test Virtual vs in-Person 6-Month Follow-Up of Learning.针对医生的沉浸式领导力培训:比较回顾性前后测试中虚拟培训与面对面培训6个月学习随访情况。
J Healthc Leadersh. 2024 Jun 24;16:235-254. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S455105. eCollection 2024.
6
[Promoting Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Healthcare: An Example of the COVID-19 Pandemic].[促进医疗保健领域的公平、多样性和包容性:以新冠疫情为例]
Hu Li Za Zhi. 2024 Oct;71(5):96-103. doi: 10.6224/JN.202410_71(5).12.
7
SAGES White Paper on the importance of diversity in surgical leadership: creating the fundamentals of leadership development (FLD) curriculum.SAGES 白皮书:重视外科领导力中的多样性:创建领导力发展(FLD)课程基础。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jun;38(6):2939-2946. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10815-w. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
8
Advancing Leadership Training to Address Health Equity and Respond to Public Health Emergencies.推进领导力培训,以解决健康公平问题和应对突发公共卫生事件。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2022;28(5 Suppl 5):S254-S262. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001521.
9
10
From Roots to Results: A Qualitative Case Study of the Evolution of a Public Health Leadership Institute Building Capacity in Collaborating for Equity and Justice.从根源到成果:关于一个公共卫生领导力机构在促进公平与正义合作中能力建设演变的定性案例研究
Health Educ Behav. 2019 Oct;46(1_suppl):33S-43S. doi: 10.1177/1090198119853616.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and implementation of a sensitivity training curriculum focused on equity in healthcare.开发并实施一门专注于医疗保健公平性的敏感性培训课程。
Learn Health Syst. 2025 Mar 28;9(3):e70007. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.70007. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Bridging gaps in orthopedic residency admissions: embracing diversity beyond research metrics.弥合骨科住院医师录取中的差距:超越研究指标,拥抱多样性。
Can Med Educ J. 2025 May 1;16(2):68-70. doi: 10.36834/cmej.80264. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Barriers to health equity in the United States of America: can they be overcome?

本文引用的文献

1
Using a most significant change approach to evaluate learner-centric outcomes of clinical scholars leadership training program.采用最显著变化法评估以学习者为中心的临床学者领导力培训项目的成果。
Eval Program Plann. 2022 Oct;94:102141. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102141. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
2
Reflections on the contributions of self-advocates to an interdisciplinary leadership development program for graduate students in health affairs.关于自倡导者对健康事务研究生跨学科领导力发展项目贡献的思考。
Disabil Health J. 2018 Apr;11(2):293-297. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.09.002. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
3
Breadth of the Socio-Ecological Model.
美利坚合众国健康公平的障碍:它们能够被克服吗?
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Feb 7;24(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02401-w.
4
Immersive Leadership Training for Physicians: Comparing Retrospective Pre- and Post-Test Virtual vs in-Person 6-Month Follow-Up of Learning.针对医生的沉浸式领导力培训:比较回顾性前后测试中虚拟培训与面对面培训6个月学习随访情况。
J Healthc Leadersh. 2024 Jun 24;16:235-254. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S455105. eCollection 2024.
5
Confounding factors affecting the clinical decision-making of nursing and midwifery students post-pandemic COVID-19: cross-sectional study in Jordan.影响新冠疫情后护理及助产专业学生临床决策的混杂因素:约旦的横断面研究
BMC Nurs. 2024 Jun 24;23(1):424. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02108-3.
6
Building a New Generation of Public Health Leaders Forged in a Public Health Crisis.在公共卫生危机中锻造新一代公共卫生领袖。
Am J Public Health. 2024 Jun;114(6):626-632. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307633. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
7
Impacts of an Interprofessional Relational Leadership Training on Well-being.跨专业关系领导力培训对幸福感的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Dec;38(16):3654-3656. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08436-5. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
8
Comparing Virtual vs In-Person Immersive Leadership Training for Physicians.比较针对医生的虚拟沉浸式领导力培训与面对面沉浸式领导力培训
J Healthc Leadersh. 2023 Aug 11;15:139-152. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S411091. eCollection 2023.
9
"What We're Doing Now…Is More Than Water Cooler": Perspectives of Primary Care Leaders on Leading Through (and Beyond) COVID-19.“我们现在所做的……不仅仅是闲聊”:基层医疗领导者对在新冠疫情期间(及之后)引领工作的看法
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Feb;39(2):239-246. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08373-3. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
10
Accelerating diversity, equity, and inclusion goals: a qualitative assessment from the lens of scientists at the 2020 Clinical Translational Science Awards Annual Meeting.加速多元化、公平性和包容性目标:从2020年临床转化科学奖年会科学家的视角进行的定性评估。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Dec 7;7(1):e35. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.516. eCollection 2023.
社会生态模型的广度
J Agromedicine. 2017;22(4):295-297. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2017.1358971.
4
Separate and unequal: Structural racism and infant mortality in the US.隔离且不平等:美国的结构性种族主义与婴儿死亡率
Health Place. 2017 May;45:140-144. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.03.012. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
5
An Examination of the Self-directed Online Leadership Learning Choices of Public Health Professionals: The Maternal and Child Health Public Health Leadership Institute Experience.公共卫生专业人员自主在线领导力学习选择的考察:母婴健康公共卫生领导力研究所的经验
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2017 Sep/Oct;23(5):454-460. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000463.
6
Conquering racial disparities in perinatal outcomes.消除围产期结局中的种族差异。
Clin Perinatol. 2014 Dec;41(4):847-75. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2014.08.008. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
7
Moving the needle: a retrospective pre- and post-analysis of improving perceived abilities across 20 leadership skills.推动变革:对20项领导技能的感知能力提升进行的回顾性前后分析。
Matern Child Health J. 2015 Feb;19(2):343-52. doi: 10.1007/s10995-014-1573-1.
8
Questions of trust in health research on social capital: what aspects of personal network social capital do they measure?社会资本健康研究中的信任问题:它们衡量个人网络社会资本的哪些方面?
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Sep;116:225-34. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.017. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
9
Closing the Black-White gap in birth outcomes: a life-course approach.缩小出生结局的黑-白差距:一种生命历程方法。
Ethn Dis. 2010 Winter;20(1 Suppl 2):S2-62-76.
10
The UNC-CH MCH Leadership Training Consortium: building the capacity to develop interdisciplinary MCH leaders.北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校母婴保健领导力培训联盟:建设跨学科母婴保健领导者的能力。
Matern Child Health J. 2010 Jul;14(4):642-8. doi: 10.1007/s10995-009-0483-0. Epub 2009 Jun 25.