• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

来自“测试波士顿”(一项完全远程的纵向大规模新冠病毒监测研究)的远程试验实施的可行性及经验教训。

Feasibility and lessons learned on remote trial implementation from TestBoston, a fully remote, longitudinal, large-scale COVID-19 surveillance study.

作者信息

Naz-McLean Sarah, Kim Andy, Zimmer Andrew, Laibinis Hannah, Lapan Jen, Tyman Paul, Hung Jessica, Kelly Christina, Nagireddy Himaja, Narayanan-Pandit Surya, McCarthy Margaret, Ratnaparkhi Saee, Rutherford Henry, Patel Rajesh, Dryden-Peterson Scott, Hung Deborah T, Woolley Ann E, Cosimi Lisa A

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America.

Division of Epidemiology, University of Toronto Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Jun 3;17(6):e0269127. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269127. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0269127
PMID:35657813
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9165767/
Abstract

Longitudinal clinical studies traditionally require in-person study visits which are well documented to pose barriers to participation and contribute challenges to enrolling representative samples. Remote trial models may reduce barriers to research engagement, improve retention, and reach a more representative cohort. As remote trials become more common following the COVID-19 pandemic, a critical evaluation of this approach is imperative to optimize this paradigm shift in research. The TestBoston study was launched to understand prevalence and risk factors for COVID-19 infection in the greater Boston area through a fully remote home-testing model. Participants (adults, within 45 miles of Boston, MA) were recruited remotely from patient registries at Brigham and Women's Hospital and the general public. Participants were provided with monthly and "on-demand" at-home SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR and antibody testing using nasal swab and dried blood spot self-collection kits and electronic surveys to assess symptoms and risk factors for COVID-19 via an online dashboard. Between October 2020 and January 2021, we enrolled 10,289 participants reflective of Massachusetts census data. Mean age was 47 years (range 18-93), 5855 (56.9%) were assigned female sex at birth, 7181(69.8%) reported being White non-Hispanic, 952 (9.3%) Hispanic/Latinx, 925 (9.0%) Black, 889 (8.6%) Asian, and 342 (3.3%) other and/or more than one race. Lower initial enrollment among Black and Hispanic/Latinx individuals required an adaptive approach to recruitment, leveraging connections to the medical system, coupled with community partnerships to ensure a representative cohort. Longitudinal retention was higher among participants who were White non-Hispanic, older, working remotely, and with lower socioeconomic vulnerability. Implementation highlighted key differences in remote trial models as participants independently navigate study milestones, requiring a dedicated participant support team and robust technology platforms, to reduce barriers to enrollment, promote retention, and ensure scientific rigor and data quality. Remote clinical trial models offer tremendous potential to engage representative cohorts, scale biomedical research, and promote accessibility by reducing barriers common in traditional trial design. Barriers and burdens within remote trials may be experienced disproportionately across demographic groups. To maximize engagement and retention, researchers should prioritize intensive participant support, investment in technologic infrastructure and an adaptive approach to maximize engagement and retention.

摘要

传统的纵向临床研究需要进行面对面的研究访视,有充分记录表明这种访视对参与构成障碍,并给招募具有代表性的样本带来挑战。远程试验模式可能会减少研究参与的障碍,提高留存率,并覆盖更具代表性的队列。随着远程试验在新冠疫情后变得越来越普遍,对这种方法进行批判性评估对于优化这一研究范式转变至关重要。“波士顿测试”研究旨在通过完全远程的家庭测试模式了解大波士顿地区新冠病毒感染的患病率和风险因素。参与者(年龄在马萨诸塞州波士顿45英里范围内的成年人)从布莱根妇女医院的患者登记处和普通公众中远程招募。通过在线仪表板,为参与者提供每月一次和“按需”的居家严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2逆转录聚合酶链反应(SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR)和抗体检测,使用鼻拭子和干血斑自我采集试剂盒,以及电子调查问卷来评估新冠病毒感染的症状和风险因素。在2020年10月至2021年1月期间,我们招募了10289名反映马萨诸塞州人口普查数据的参与者。平均年龄为47岁(范围18 - 93岁),5855名(56.9%)出生时被指定为女性,7181名(69.8%)报告为非西班牙裔白人,952名(9.3%)西班牙裔/拉丁裔,925名(9.0%)黑人,889名(8.6%)亚洲人,342名(3.3%)其他种族和/或不止一个种族。黑人和西班牙裔/拉丁裔个体最初的入组率较低,这需要一种适应性的招募方法,利用与医疗系统的联系,并结合社区伙伴关系来确保有代表性的队列。非西班牙裔白人、年龄较大、远程工作且社会经济脆弱性较低的参与者的纵向留存率较高。实施过程突出了远程试验模式的关键差异,因为参与者要独立完成研究里程碑,这需要一个专门的参与者支持团队和强大的技术平台,以减少入组障碍,提高留存率,并确保科学严谨性和数据质量。远程临床试验模式具有巨大潜力,通过减少传统试验设计中常见的障碍来吸引具有代表性的队列、扩大生物医学研究规模并提高可及性。远程试验中的障碍和负担在不同人口群体中可能存在不成比例的情况。为了最大限度地提高参与度和留存率,研究人员应优先提供密集的参与者支持、投资技术基础设施,并采用适应性方法来最大限度地提高参与度和留存率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/758b/9165767/d72d53a97641/pone.0269127.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/758b/9165767/51074287243a/pone.0269127.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/758b/9165767/d45ea9abb171/pone.0269127.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/758b/9165767/5719040d20e7/pone.0269127.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/758b/9165767/d72d53a97641/pone.0269127.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/758b/9165767/51074287243a/pone.0269127.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/758b/9165767/d45ea9abb171/pone.0269127.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/758b/9165767/5719040d20e7/pone.0269127.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/758b/9165767/d72d53a97641/pone.0269127.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Feasibility and lessons learned on remote trial implementation from TestBoston, a fully remote, longitudinal, large-scale COVID-19 surveillance study.来自“测试波士顿”(一项完全远程的纵向大规模新冠病毒监测研究)的远程试验实施的可行性及经验教训。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 3;17(6):e0269127. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269127. eCollection 2022.
2
Comparison of Racial, Ethnic, and Geographic Location Diversity of Participants Enrolled in Clinic-Based vs 2 Remote COVID-19 Clinical Trials.比较诊所招募的参与者和 2 项远程 COVID-19 临床试验参与者在种族、民族和地理位置多样性方面的差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2148325. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.48325.
3
At-home Testing and Risk Factors for Acquisition of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in a Major US Metropolitan Area.美国一个主要大都市地区SARS-CoV-2感染的居家检测及感染风险因素
medRxiv. 2022 Feb 3:2022.02.02.22269258. doi: 10.1101/2022.02.02.22269258.
4
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 住院成人患者使用伊马替尼的安全性和疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9.
5
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.
6
The SARS-CoV-2 Ivermectin Navarra-ISGlobal Trial (SAINT) to Evaluate the Potential of Ivermectin to Reduce COVID-19 Transmission in low risk, non-severe COVID-19 patients in the first 48 hours after symptoms onset: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized control pilot trial.SARS-CoV-2 依维莫司纳瓦拉-ISGlobal 试验(SAINT)评估依维莫司在症状出现后 48 小时内降低低危、非重症 COVID-19 患者 COVID-19 传播风险的潜力:一项随机对照试验方案的研究方案结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Jun 8;21(1):498. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04421-z.
7
Barriers, Solutions, and Opportunities for Adapting Critical Care Clinical Trials in the COVID-19 Pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,适应重症监护临床试验的障碍、解决方案和机遇。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2420458. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.20458.
8
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (inactivated, Vero cell): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项评估 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗(灭活,Vero 细胞)有效性和安全性的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照 III 期临床试验:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Apr 13;22(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05180-1.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
Management of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System blockade in patients admitted to hospital with confirmed coronavirus disease (COVID-19) infection (The McGill RAAS-COVID- 19): A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.伴有确诊的 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)感染住院患者肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统阻滞剂管理(麦吉尔 RAAS-COVID-19):一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Feb 5;22(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05080-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-reported outcomes and home-based self-swabs for influenza-like illness events - lessons learned from the 2023/2024 DANFLU-2 Homeswab PRO substudy.流感样疾病事件的患者报告结局及家庭自我采样——2023/2024年丹麦流感2家庭采样患者报告结局子研究的经验教训
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2025 Aug 22;9(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s41687-025-00936-8.
2
Participant engagement in a national longitudinal study of COVID-19: Insights from the INSPIRE study.参与者参与一项关于 COVID-19 的全国纵向研究:来自 INSPIRE 研究的见解。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 22;20(7):e0325948. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325948. eCollection 2025.
3
Reliability of the Italian Version of the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Scale Administered Remotely.

本文引用的文献

1
Learning from remote decentralised clinical trial experiences: A qualitative analysis of interviews with trial personnel, patient representatives and other stakeholders.从远程去中心化临床试验经验中学习:对试验人员、患者代表和其他利益相关者进行访谈的定性分析。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Mar;88(3):1031-1042. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15003. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
2
A randomized phase II remote study to assess Bacopa for Gulf War Illness associated cognitive dysfunction: Design and methods of a national study.一项评估 Bacopa 对海湾战争相关认知功能障碍的随机 II 期远程研究:一项全国性研究的设计和方法。
Life Sci. 2021 Oct 1;282:119819. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119819. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
3
意大利版上肢Fugl-Meyer量表远程应用的可靠性
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 19;13(24):7750. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247750.
4
A 40-week phase 2B randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the safety and efficacy of memantine in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.一项为期40周的2B期随机、多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照研究,评估美金刚在肌萎缩侧索硬化症中的安全性和有效性。
Muscle Nerve. 2025 Jan;71(1):63-72. doi: 10.1002/mus.28287. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
5
Quantitative biomechanical analysis in validating a video-based model to remotely assess physical frailty: a potential solution to telehealth and globalized remote-patient monitoring.在验证基于视频的模型以远程评估身体虚弱方面的定量生物力学分析:远程医疗和全球化远程患者监测的潜在解决方案。
Biomed Eng Lett. 2024 Jul 27;14(6):1365-1375. doi: 10.1007/s13534-024-00410-2. eCollection 2024 Nov.
6
Impact of financial compensation on enrollment and participation in a remote, mobile-app based research study.经济补偿对参与一项基于移动应用程序的远程研究的招募和参与情况的影响。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Apr 5;8(1):e75. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.515. eCollection 2024.
7
Remote Assessment in healthcare-Technologies, methods, benefits, and challenges.远程医疗评估——技术、方法、益处和挑战。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 6;18(4):e0283945. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283945. eCollection 2023.
8
At-home Testing and Risk Factors for Acquisition of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in a Major US Metropolitan Area.美国一个主要大都市地区的家庭检测与感染新冠病毒的风险因素
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Oct 5;9(11):ofac505. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac505. eCollection 2022 Nov.
9
Sleep patterns of patients receiving home parenteral nutrition: A home-based observational study.接受家庭肠外营养患者的睡眠模式:一项基于家庭的观察性研究。
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2022 Sep;46(7):1699-1708. doi: 10.1002/jpen.2346. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
10
At-home Testing and Risk Factors for Acquisition of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in a Major US Metropolitan Area.美国一个主要大都市地区SARS-CoV-2感染的居家检测及感染风险因素
medRxiv. 2022 Feb 3:2022.02.02.22269258. doi: 10.1101/2022.02.02.22269258.
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Cancer Clinical Trials.
COVID-19 大流行对癌症临床试验的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Nov;28(12):7311-7316. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10406-2. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
4
Clinical research during the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of virtual visits and digital approaches.2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的临床研究:虚拟问诊和数字方法的作用
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Mar 8;5(1):e102. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.19.
5
Response of the trial innovation network to the COVID-19 pandemic.试验创新网络对COVID-19大流行的应对。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Apr 20;5(1):e100. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.782.
6
Use of connected digital products in clinical research following the COVID-19 pandemic: a comprehensive analysis of clinical trials.新冠疫情后临床研究中使用联网数字产品:临床试验综合分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 22;11(6):e047341. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047341.
7
Overcoming Historical Barriers: Enhancing Positive Perceptions of Medical Research Among African Americans Through a Conference-Based Workshop.克服历史障碍:通过基于会议的研讨会增强非裔美国人对医学研究的积极看法。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Sep;36(9):2547-2554. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06736-2. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
8
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.种族和民族在原发性开角型青光眼临床试验中的差异:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e218348. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8348.
9
Delivering clinical trials at home: protocol, design and implementation of a direct-to-family paediatric lupus trial.在家中开展临床试验:一项直接面向家庭的儿科狼疮试验的方案、设计和实施。
Lupus Sci Med. 2021 May;8(1). doi: 10.1136/lupus-2021-000494.
10
Clinical research activities during COVID-19: the point of view of a promoter of academic clinical trials.2019冠状病毒病期间的临床研究活动:学术临床试验发起者的观点
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Apr 30;21(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01291-0.