• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经济补偿对参与一项基于移动应用程序的远程研究的招募和参与情况的影响。

Impact of financial compensation on enrollment and participation in a remote, mobile-app based research study.

作者信息

Meier Shelby, Cheng Alex, Tischbein Maeve, Shyr Cathy, Jerome Rebecca N, Edwards Terri L, Stroud Mary, Wilkins Consuelo H, Harris Paul A

机构信息

Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Apr 5;8(1):e75. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.515. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1017/cts.2024.515
PMID:38715567
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11075110/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on how to determine appropriate financial compensation for research recruitment. Selecting incentive amounts that are reasonable and respectful, without undue inducement, remains challenging. Previously, we demonstrated that incentive amount significantly impacts participants' willingness to complete various hypothetical research activities. Here we further explore this relationship in a mock decentralized study.

METHODS

Adult ResearchMatch volunteers were invited to join a prospective study where interested individuals were given an opportunity to view details for a study along with participation requirements, then offered a randomly generated compensation amount between $0 and $50 to enroll and participate. Individuals agreeing to participate were then asked to complete tasks using a remote mobile application (MyCap), for two weeks. Tasks included a weekly survey, a daily gratitude journal and daily phone tapping task.

RESULTS

Willingness to participate was 85% across all incentive levels but not significantly impacted by amount. Task completion appeared to increase as a function of compensation until a plateau at $25. While participants described the study as low burden and reported that compensation was moderately important to their decision to join, only 31% completed all study tasks.

CONCLUSION

While offering compensation in this study did not have a strong effect on enrollment rate, this work provides insight into participant motivation when joining and participating in studies employing mobile applications.

摘要

背景

对于如何确定合理的研究招募经济补偿尚无共识。选择合理且恰当、不存在过度诱导的激励金额仍然具有挑战性。此前,我们证明了激励金额会显著影响参与者完成各种假设性研究活动的意愿。在此,我们在一项模拟去中心化研究中进一步探究这种关系。

方法

邀请成年ResearchMatch志愿者参与一项前瞻性研究,感兴趣的个体有机会查看一项研究的详细信息以及参与要求,然后提供0美元至50美元之间随机生成的补偿金额以招募其参与。同意参与的个体随后被要求使用远程移动应用程序(MyCap)完成任务,为期两周。任务包括每周一次的调查、每日感恩日记和每日电话录音任务。

结果

在所有激励水平下,参与意愿均为85%,但未受到金额的显著影响。任务完成情况似乎随着补偿增加而上升,直到25美元时趋于平稳。虽然参与者将该研究描述为负担较轻,并表示补偿对他们决定参与的影响适中,但只有31%的人完成了所有研究任务。

结论

虽然本研究中提供补偿对招募率没有显著影响,但这项工作为了解使用移动应用程序的研究中参与者的参与动机提供了见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a967/11075110/6d18da344c4a/S2059866124005156_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a967/11075110/8eca928378d9/S2059866124005156_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a967/11075110/8dfe79c0a7d8/S2059866124005156_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a967/11075110/afa3f02ed3de/S2059866124005156_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a967/11075110/6d18da344c4a/S2059866124005156_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a967/11075110/8eca928378d9/S2059866124005156_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a967/11075110/8dfe79c0a7d8/S2059866124005156_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a967/11075110/afa3f02ed3de/S2059866124005156_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a967/11075110/6d18da344c4a/S2059866124005156_fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of financial compensation on enrollment and participation in a remote, mobile-app based research study.经济补偿对参与一项基于移动应用程序的远程研究的招募和参与情况的影响。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Apr 5;8(1):e75. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.515. eCollection 2024.
2
Is It a Bribe? Research Personnels' Perceptions of the Ethical Aspects of Financial Compensation to Healthy Volunteers in Prevention Trials in Tanzania.这是贿赂吗?坦桑尼亚预防试验中研究人员对向健康志愿者提供经济补偿的伦理方面的看法。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2025 Apr-Jun;16(2):112-125. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2025.2474910. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
3
Phase I trial compensation: How much do healthy volunteers actually earn from clinical trial enrollment?I 期临床试验补偿:健康志愿者参与临床试验实际能挣多少?
Clin Trials. 2021 Aug;18(4):477-487. doi: 10.1177/17407745211011069. Epub 2021 May 2.
4
Effectiveness and Ethics of Incentives for Research Participation: 2 Randomized Clinical Trials.激励研究参与的有效性和伦理问题:2 项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Nov 1;181(11):1479-1488. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.5450.
5
Does financial compensation for living kidney donation change willingness to donate?对活体肾捐赠给予经济补偿会改变捐赠意愿吗?
Am J Transplant. 2015 Jan;15(1):265-73. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13004. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
6
Design of Financial Incentive Programs for Smoking Cessation: A Discrete Choice Experiment.设计戒烟的金融激励计划:离散选择实验。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Oct 17;24(10):1661-1668. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntac042.
7
Motivation for participating in phase 1 vaccine trials: Comparison of an influenza and an Ebola randomized controlled trial.参与 1 期疫苗试验的动机:流感和埃博拉随机对照试验的比较。
Vaccine. 2019 Jan 7;37(2):289-295. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.11.014. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
8
Participant retention in a fully remote trial of digital psychotherapy: Comparison of incentive types.数字心理治疗完全远程试验中的参与者留存率:激励类型的比较。
Front Digit Health. 2022 Sep 6;4:963741. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.963741. eCollection 2022.
9
Understanding Barriers and Facilitators to Signing Up for a Mobile-Responsive Registry to Recruit Healthy Volunteers and Members of Underrepresented Communities for Alzheimer's Disease Prevention Studies.了解健康志愿者和代表性不足社区成员报名参加移动响应注册以参与阿尔茨海默病预防研究的障碍和促进因素。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2023;10(4):865-874. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2023.67.
10
A prospective, randomized, single-blinded, crossover trial to investigate the effect of a wearable device in addition to a daily symptom diary for the remote early detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections (COVID-RED): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项前瞻性、随机、单盲、交叉试验,旨在研究可穿戴设备对远程早期检测 SARS-CoV-2 感染(COVID-RED)的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jun 22;22(1):412. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05241-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Incentivising participation in mental health app research: lessons learned from a mixed methods randomised controlled trial.激励参与心理健康应用程序研究:一项混合方法随机对照试验的经验教训。
BJPsych Open. 2025 May 19;11(3):e111. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2025.48.
2
Supporting rapid innovation in research data capture and management: the REDCap external module framework.支持研究数据采集与管理的快速创新:REDCap外部模块框架
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 Jul 1;32(7):1149-1156. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf073.
3
A training protocol compliance of 13% was observed in a research study of clinical research professionals.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient-Reported Outcomes, Digital Health, and the Quest to Improve Health Equity.患者报告结局、数字健康以及改善健康公平的探索。
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2023 Jun;43:e390678. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_390678.
2
Recruitment and Retention in Remote Research: Learnings From a Large, Decentralized Real-world Study.远程研究中的招募与留存:来自一项大型、分散式真实世界研究的经验教训。
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Nov 14;6(11):e40765. doi: 10.2196/40765.
3
Participants' Perspectives on Payment for Research Participation: A Qualitative Study.参与者对参与研究付费的看法:一项定性研究。
在一项针对临床研究专业人员的研究中,观察到培训协议的遵守率为 13%。
BMC Res Notes. 2024 Aug 1;17(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s13104-024-06870-0.
Ethics Hum Res. 2022 Nov;44(6):14-22. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500147.
4
Participant recruitment and retention from vulnerable populations in clinical trials is a matter of trust.在临床试验中,从弱势群体中招募和留住参与者是一个信任问题。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Dec;123:106969. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106969. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
5
Social Media Use for Research Participant Recruitment: Integrative Literature Review.社交媒体在研究参与者招募中的应用:综合文献回顾。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 4;24(8):e38015. doi: 10.2196/38015.
6
MyCap: a flexible and configurable platform for mobilizing the participant voice.MyCap:一个用于调动参与者声音的灵活且可配置的平台。
JAMIA Open. 2022 Jun 3;5(2):ooac047. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac047. eCollection 2022 Jul.
7
Feasibility and lessons learned on remote trial implementation from TestBoston, a fully remote, longitudinal, large-scale COVID-19 surveillance study.来自“测试波士顿”(一项完全远程的纵向大规模新冠病毒监测研究)的远程试验实施的可行性及经验教训。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 3;17(6):e0269127. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269127. eCollection 2022.
8
Learning from COVID-19 related trial adaptations to inform efficient trial design-a sequential mixed methods study.从 COVID-19 相关试验调整中学习以提供高效的试验设计:一项序贯混合方法研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Apr 29;22(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01609-6.
9
The effectiveness of incentives for research participation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.激励研究参与的有效性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 22;17(4):e0267534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267534. eCollection 2022.
10
The Strategies for Quantitative and Qualitative Remote Data Collection: Lessons From the COVID-19 Pandemic.定量和定性远程数据收集策略:来自新冠疫情的经验教训
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Apr 8;6(4):e30055. doi: 10.2196/30055.