• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《大五人格量表-2》的挪威语改编版

The Norwegian Adaptation of the Big Five Inventory-2.

作者信息

Føllesdal Hallvard, Soto Christopher J

机构信息

Department of Organizational Behaviour, BI Norwegian Business School, Oslo, Norway.

Department of Psychology, Colby College, Waterville, ME, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 May 18;13:858920. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.858920. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.858920
PMID:35664220
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9158541/
Abstract

Two studies were conducted to assess the psychometric properties of scores from the Norwegian adaptation of the Big Five Inventory-2 (BFI-2). In Study 1, the BFI-2 was translated to Norwegian and the scores from a convenience sample ( = 606) demonstrated good psychometric properties. BFI-2 scores from subsamples correlated in expected ways with self- and other ratings of the Big Five, and with self-ratings of empathic concern and perspective taking. In Study 2, after some minor improvements in translation, the psychometric properties of BFI-2 scores were assessed in a new sample ( = 409). Results from random intercept EFA of scores supported the proposed model. The psychometric properties of two shorter versions of the inventory, the BFI-2-S and BFI-2-XS, were also examined. Overall, the results suggest that the Norwegian adaptation of the BFI-2 provide reliable and valid scores.

摘要

开展了两项研究以评估挪威版大五人格量表第二版(BFI-2)得分的心理测量特性。在研究1中,BFI-2被翻译成挪威语,来自一个便利样本(n = 606)的得分显示出良好的心理测量特性。子样本的BFI-2得分与大五人格的自我和他人评定以及共情关注和观点采择的自我评定以预期的方式相关。在研究2中,在翻译上做了一些小的改进后,在一个新样本(n = 409)中评估了BFI-2得分的心理测量特性。得分的随机截距探索性因素分析结果支持了所提出的模型。还检验了该量表两个较短版本BFI-2-S和BFI-2-XS的心理测量特性。总体而言,结果表明挪威版的BFI-2能提供可靠且有效的得分。

相似文献

1
The Norwegian Adaptation of the Big Five Inventory-2.《大五人格量表-2》的挪威语改编版
Front Psychol. 2022 May 18;13:858920. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.858920. eCollection 2022.
2
[Validation of the French version of the 10-item Big Five Inventory].[10 项大五人格量表法语版的验证]
Encephale. 2020 Dec;46(6):455-462. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.02.006. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
3
[Does the French Big Five Inventory evaluate facets other than the Big Five factors?].[法国大五人格量表是否评估了大五人格因素以外的其他方面?]
Encephale. 2018 Jun;44(3):208-214. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
4
The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power.下一个大五人格量表(BFI-2):开发和评估一个具有 15 个方面的层次模型,以提高带宽、保真度和预测能力。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Jul;113(1):117-143. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000096. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
5
"The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power": Correction to Soto and John (2016).《大五人格量表第二版(BFI-2):开发和评估具有 15 个方面的层级模型,以提高带宽、保真度和预测能力》:对 Soto 和 John(2016)的更正。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Jul;113(1):143. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000155.
6
A validation of the Japanese adaptation of the Big Five Inventory-2.《大五人格量表-2》日本版的效度验证。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 14;13:924351. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.924351. eCollection 2022.
7
Evaluating the complete (44-item), short (20-item) and ultra-short (10-item) versions of the Big Five Inventory (BFI) in the Brazilian population.评估巴西人群中大五人格量表(BFI)的完整(44 项)、简短(20 项)和超短(10 项)版本。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 5;13(1):7372. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34504-1.
8
The Big Five Inventory-2: Replication of Psychometric Properties in a Dutch Adaptation and First Evidence for the Discriminant Predictive Validity of the Facet Scales [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text].大五人格量表-2:荷兰语适应版的心理测量特性复制及特质量表鉴别预测效度的初步证据 [公式:见正文] [公式:见正文] [公式:见正文]。
J Pers Assess. 2020 May-Jun;102(3):309-324. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1539004. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
9
[Is personality assessment with the French Big Five Inventory (BFI-Fr) invariant according to gender and activity of the respondents?].[使用法国大五人格量表(BFI-Fr)进行的人格评估是否因受访者的性别和活动而具有不变性?]
Encephale. 2022 Feb;48(1):52-59. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2021.02.006. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
10
Psychometric Evaluation of Chinese-Language 44-Item and 10-Item Big Five Personality Inventories, Including Correlations with Chronotype, Mindfulness and Mind Wandering.中文版44项和10项大五人格量表的心理测量学评估,包括与昼夜节律类型、正念和走神的相关性
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 26;11(2):e0149963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149963. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Dimensions of music use motivations: Genetic and environmental underpinnings, and associations with Big Five and Empathy traits.音乐使用动机的维度:遗传和环境基础,以及与大五人格和共情特质的关联。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 8;20(8):e0329808. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329808. eCollection 2025.
2
The role of Big Five personality domains and facets in musical sensibility: a twin study.大五人格领域和特质在音乐感知中的作用:一项双生子研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 19;15(1):13559. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95661-z.
3
Reliability generalization meta-analysis of the internal consistency of the Big Five Inventory (BFI) by comparing BFI (44 items) and BFI-2 (60 items) versions controlling for age, sex, language factors.通过比较大五人格量表(BFI,44个项目)和大五人格量表第二版(BFI-2,60个项目)版本,控制年龄、性别、语言因素,对大五人格量表内部一致性进行可靠性概括性元分析。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jan 8;13(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02271-x.
4
A validation of the Japanese adaptation of the Big Five Inventory-2.《大五人格量表-2》日本版的效度验证。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 14;13:924351. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.924351. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Measurement Invariance and Sex and Age Differences of the Big Five Inventory-2: Evidence From the Russian Version.大五人格量表 2 的测量不变性和性别与年龄差异:来自俄罗斯语版的证据。
Assessment. 2020 Apr;27(3):472-486. doi: 10.1177/1073191119860901. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
2
Empathy and big five personality model in medical students and its relationship to gender and specialty preference: a cross-sectional study.医学生的同理心与大五人格模型及其与性别和专业偏好的关系:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Feb 14;19(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1485-2.
3
The Big Five Inventory-2: Replication of Psychometric Properties in a Dutch Adaptation and First Evidence for the Discriminant Predictive Validity of the Facet Scales [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text].大五人格量表-2:荷兰语适应版的心理测量特性复制及特质量表鉴别预测效度的初步证据 [公式:见正文] [公式:见正文] [公式:见正文]。
J Pers Assess. 2020 May-Jun;102(3):309-324. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1539004. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
4
Associations between empathy and big five personality traits among Chinese undergraduate medical students.中国本科医学生的共情与大五人格特质之间的关联。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 10;12(2):e0171665. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171665. eCollection 2017.
5
Searching for the Prosocial Personality: A Big Five Approach to Linking Personality and Prosocial Behavior.寻找亲社会人格:一种将人格与亲社会行为联系起来的大五人格方法。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2016 Sep;42(9):1177-92. doi: 10.1177/0146167216652859. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
6
The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power.下一个大五人格量表(BFI-2):开发和评估一个具有 15 个方面的层次模型,以提高带宽、保真度和预测能力。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Jul;113(1):117-143. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000096. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
7
Similar Personality Patterns Are Associated with Empathy in Four Different Countries.相似的人格模式与四个不同国家的同理心相关。
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 8;7:290. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00290. eCollection 2016.
8
Complexity And Simplicity As Objective Indices Descriptive Of Factor Solutions.复杂性和简单性作为描述因子解的客观指标。
Multivariate Behav Res. 1978 Apr 1;13(2):247-50. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1302_9.
9
Random intercept EFA of personality scales.人格量表的随机截距探索性因素分析
J Res Pers. 2014 Dec;53:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.001.
10
Hierarchical representations of the five-factor model of personality in predicting job performance: integrating three organizing frameworks with two theoretical perspectives.人格五因素模型在预测工作绩效方面的层次表示:用三个组织框架和两种理论观点整合。
J Appl Psychol. 2013 Nov;98(6):875-925. doi: 10.1037/a0033901. Epub 2013 Sep 9.