• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定义晚期卵巢癌患者报告结局的标准集。

Defining a Standard Set of Patient-Reported Outcomes for Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer.

作者信息

Escudero-Vilaplana Vicente, Bernal Elsa, Casado Gema, Collado-Borrell Roberto, Diez-Fernández Raúl, Fernández Román Ana Beatriz, Folguera Carlos, González-Cortijo Lucía, Herrero-Fernández Marta, Marquina Gloria, Martínez Nieto Concepción, Rodríguez Miguel Angel, Rubio Ana Rosa, Sanmartin-Fenollera Patricia, Vazquez Castillo Maria José, Comellas Marta, Guerra Eva Maria

机构信息

Hospital Pharmacy, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2022 May 18;12:885910. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.885910. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2022.885910
PMID:35664764
原文链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9159390/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) and its treatment cause several symptoms and impact on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We aim to reach a consensus on the most relevant patient-reported outcome (PROs), the corresponding measures (PROMs), and measurement frequency during AOC patients' follow-up from patients' and healthcare professionals' (HCP) perspective.

METHODS

The project comprised five steps: 1) a literature review, 2) a focus group with patients, 3) a nominal group with HCP, 4) two round-Delphi consultations with patients and HCP, and 5) a final meeting with HCP. Delphi questionnaire was elaborated based on literature review, focus group (n=5 patients), and nominal group (n=16 HCP). The relevance of each PRO and the appropriateness (A) and feasibility (F) of the proposed PROM were assessed (Likert scale 1=strongly agree; 9=strongly disagree). The consensus was reached when at least 75% of the panelists rated it as 'relevant', 'appropriate', or 'feasible' (score 7-9).

RESULTS

A total of 56 HCP [51.8% Hospital Pharmacy; 41.1% Oncology; 3.6% Nursing; and 3.6% Psycho-oncology; mean time in specialty 12.5 (8.0) years] and 10 AOC patients [mean time diagnosis 5.4 (3.0) years] participated in the 1 round. All PROs achieved consensus regarding their relevance, except dry skin (58.0%). Agreement was reached for PRO-CTCAE to be used to assess fatigue (A:84.9%; F:75.8%), neuropathy (A:92.4%; F:77.3%), diarrhea (A:87.9%; F:88.7%), constipation (A:86.4%; F:75.8%), nausea (A:89.4%; F:75.8%), insomnia (A:81.8%; F:88.7%), abdominal bloating (A:82.2%; F:82.2%) and sexuality (A:78.8%; F:88.6%); EQ-5D to determine patients' HRQoL (A:87.9%; F:80.3%), pain (A:87.9%; F:75.8%) and mood (A:77.7%; F:85.5%); to assess treatment adherence the Morisky-Green (A:90.9%; F:84.9%) and the dispensing register (A:80.3%; F:80.3%) were chosen. It was agreed to note in the medical record whether the patient's treatment preferences had been considered during decision-making (A:78.8%; F:78.8%) and to use a 5-point Likert scale to assess treatment satisfaction (A:86.4%; F:86.4%). Panelists agreed (A:92.4%; F: 77.3%) to collect these PROs (1) at the time of diagnosis/relapse; (2) one month after starting treatment/change therapeutic strategy; (3) every three months during the 1-year of treatment; and later (4) every six months until treatment completion/change.

CONCLUSIONS

The consensus reached represents the first step towards including the patient's perspective in AOC follow-up. The standardized collection of PROs in clinical practice may contribute to optimizing the follow-up of these patients and thus improving the quality of care.

摘要

目的

晚期卵巢癌(AOC)及其治疗会引发多种症状,并对患者的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)产生影响。我们旨在从患者和医疗保健专业人员(HCP)的角度,就AOC患者随访期间最相关的患者报告结局(PROs)、相应的测量工具(PROMs)以及测量频率达成共识。

方法

该项目包括五个步骤:1)文献综述;2)患者焦点小组;3)HCP名义小组;4)与患者和HCP进行两轮德尔菲咨询;5)与HCP召开最终会议。基于文献综述、焦点小组(5名患者)和名义小组(16名HCP)制定了德尔菲问卷。评估了每个PRO的相关性以及所提议的PROM的适宜性(A)和可行性(F)(李克特量表1 = 强烈同意;9 = 强烈不同意)。当至少75%的小组成员将其评为“相关”、“适宜”或“可行(得分7 - 9)时,达成共识。

结果

共有56名HCP[51.8%为医院药剂师;41.1%为肿瘤学家;3.6%为护士;3.6%为心理肿瘤学家;专科平均工作时间12.5(8.0)年]和10名AOC患者[平均诊断时间5.4(3.0)年]参与了第一轮。除皮肤干燥(58.0%)外,所有PROs在相关性方面均达成共识。对于使用PRO-CTCAE评估疲劳(A:84.9%;F:75.8%)、神经病变(A:92.4%;F:77.3%)、腹泻(A:87.9%;F:88.7%)、便秘(A:86.4%;F:

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0647/9159390/c4f778f26ca4/fonc-12-885910-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0647/9159390/6934a0825fca/fonc-12-885910-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0647/9159390/c4f778f26ca4/fonc-12-885910-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0647/9159390/6934a0825fca/fonc-12-885910-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0647/9159390/c4f778f26ca4/fonc-12-885910-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Defining a Standard Set of Patient-Reported Outcomes for Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer.定义晚期卵巢癌患者报告结局的标准集。
Front Oncol. 2022 May 18;12:885910. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.885910. eCollection 2022.
2
Patient-reported outcome measures in severe asthma: an expert consensus.严重哮喘患者报告结局测量指标:专家共识。
J Asthma. 2024 Jun;61(6):619-631. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2023.2297372. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
3
Defining a set of standardised outcome measures for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma using the Delphi consensus method: the IMPORTA project.采用德尔菲共识法为新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤患者定义一套标准化结局指标:IMPORTA项目
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 22;8(2):e018850. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018850.
4
A Swiss digital Delphi study on patient-reported outcomes.瑞士数字德尔菲研究中患者报告的结果。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2023 Nov 21;153:40125. doi: 10.57187/smw.2023.40125.
5
Patient-reported outcome measures for systemic lupus erythematosus: an expert Delphi consensus to guide implementation in routine care.系统性红斑狼疮的患者报告结局指标:一项专家德尔菲共识,以指导在常规护理中的实施。
BMC Rheumatol. 2024 Jul 16;8(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s41927-024-00401-x.
6
European Society of Coloproctology Core Outcome Set for haemorrhoidal disease: an international Delphi study among healthcare professionals.欧洲肛肠病学会痔病核心结局集:一项针对医疗保健专业人员的国际 Delphi 研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2019 May;21(5):570-580. doi: 10.1111/codi.14553. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
7
Development of an updated, standardized, patient-centered outcome set for lung cancer.开发一个更新的、标准化的、以患者为中心的肺癌结局集。
Lung Cancer. 2022 Nov;173:5-13. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.08.021. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Who Benefits From Hip Arthroplasty or Knee Arthroplasty? Preoperative Patient-reported Outcome Thresholds Predict Meaningful Improvement.哪些人能从髋关节置换术或膝关节置换术中获益?术前患者报告的结局阈值可预测有意义的改善。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 May 1;482(5):867-881. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002994. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
10
[Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].[氯化乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验标准技术规范(2023年)]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2024 Feb 12;47(2):101-119. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20231019-00247.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-reported outcomes - the missing link to advancing light chain (AL) amyloidosis clinical research.患者报告结局——推进轻链(AL)淀粉样变性临床研究的缺失环节。
Blood Rev. 2025 May 20:101303. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2025.101303.
2
Developing a Prototype Machine Learning Model to Predict Quality of Life Measures in People Living With HIV.开发一种机器学习原型模型以预测艾滋病毒感染者的生活质量指标。
Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2025 Jan 22;14:1-16. doi: 10.2147/IPRP.S492422. eCollection 2025.
3
Pre-Diagnosis Pain in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer Signals the Need for Aggressive Symptom Management.

本文引用的文献

1
Delphi survey to inform patient-reported symptom monitoring after ovarian cancer treatment.德尔菲调查,为卵巢癌治疗后的患者报告症状监测提供信息。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020 Aug 28;4(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s41687-020-00237-2.
2
The increasing value of eHealth in the delivery of patient-centred cancer care.电子健康在提供以患者为中心的癌症护理方面的价值不断增加。
Lancet Oncol. 2020 May;21(5):e240-e251. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30021-8.
3
ESMO-ESGO consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: pathology and molecular biology, early and advanced stages, borderline tumours and recurrent disease†.
胰腺癌患者的诊断前疼痛表明需要积极的症状管理。
Oncologist. 2023 Dec 11;28(12):e1185-e1197. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad153.
ESMO-ESGO 共识会议关于卵巢癌的建议:病理学和分子生物学,早期和晚期,交界性肿瘤和复发性疾病†。
Ann Oncol. 2019 May 1;30(5):672-705. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz062.
4
Epithelial ovarian cancer.上皮性卵巢癌。
Lancet. 2019 Mar 23;393(10177):1240-1253. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32552-2.
5
The facilitators and barriers to implementing patient reported outcome measures in organisations delivering health related services: a systematic review of reviews.在提供健康相关服务的组织中实施患者报告结局指标的促进因素和障碍:一项综述的系统评价
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2018 Oct 3;2:46. doi: 10.1186/s41687-018-0072-3. eCollection 2018 Dec.
6
Barriers and Benefits to the Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Routine Clinical Care: A Qualitative Study.在常规临床护理中使用患者报告结局指标的障碍与益处:一项定性研究。
Am J Med Qual. 2018 Jul;33(4):359-364. doi: 10.1177/1062860617745986. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
7
Optimizing treatment in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.复发性上皮性卵巢癌的治疗优化
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2017 Dec;17(12):1147-1158. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2017.1398088. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
8
Incorporating the patient's perspective in outcomes research.将患者的观点纳入结果研究。
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2017 Mar;29(2):144-149. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000372.
9
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cancer Clinical Trials: Measuring Symptomatic Adverse Events With the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).癌症临床试验中的患者报告结局:使用美国国立癌症研究所不良事件通用术语标准的患者报告结局版本(PRO-CTCAE)测量症状性不良事件。
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2016;35:67-73. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_159514.
10
Developing a core set of patient-reported outcomes in pancreatic cancer: A Delphi survey.制定一套胰腺癌患者报告结局的核心指标:德尔菲调查。
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Apr;57:68-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Feb 14.