School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; School of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taiwan; Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole Charity Foundation Professor in Nursing, Hong Kong.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2022 Aug;132:104276. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104276. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
Advance care planning is a communication and decision-making process during which people express their wishes for future healthcare and treatment decisions. Advance care planning is particularly relevant to frail older adults. Recently, more advance care planning interventions have been implemented in nursing homes using randomised controlled trial approaches; however, no meta-analysis has been performed evaluating and synthesising the effect of advance care planning in nursing homes.
To determine the effect of advance care planning interventions on end-of-life outcomes in nursing home populations.
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Medical database, British Nursing Index, PsycInfo and CINAHL Plus from inception to March 2021.
Randomised controlled trials or cluster randomised controlled trials implementing advance care planning interventions in nursing homes, and studies reporting end-of-life outcomes and published in English were included. Studies in which advance care planning was part of a more comprehensive intervention were excluded. The outcomes were evaluated using pooled odds ratios (ORs) or standardised mean differences (SMDs) with random-effects meta-analysis models. A meta-regression was performed to evaluate the heterogeneity of the included studies. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies.
Nine trials were identified with 2905 participants, with sample sizes ranging from 87 to 1292. The number of nursing homes involved ranged from 1 to 64. The types of advance care planning intervention differed, with most studies adopting formal education or training for nursing home staff, while the remainder adopted train-the-trainer approaches. The quality of the included studies varied, with two out of nine scoring low in overall risk of bias. Our comprehensive meta-analysis indicated with moderate heterogeneity that advance care planning interventions significantly increased the documentation of end-of-life care preferences (OR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.64, 2.32), but not satisfaction with end-of-life care from families' perspectives (SMD = 0.08, 95% CI: -0.08, 0.23). The meta-regression did not identify any variables in advance care planning interventions to explain the heterogeneity.
Advance care planning intervention yielded beneficial effects in nursing home residents by increasing the number of documented end-of-life care wishes but demonstrated no effect on satisfaction with end-of-life care from family caregivers' perspectives. This review highlights the need for more rigorously designed implementation studies to examine the effects of advance care planning interventions on healthcare outcomes among frail older adults in nursing homes.
预先护理计划是一个沟通和决策过程,在此过程中,人们表达了对未来医疗保健和治疗决策的意愿。预先护理计划对于体弱的老年人尤为重要。最近,更多的预先护理计划干预措施已在养老院中使用随机对照试验方法实施;然而,尚无荟萃分析评估和综合预先护理计划在养老院中的效果。
确定预先护理计划干预对养老院人群临终结局的影响。
对随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
从建库至 2021 年 3 月,在 Medline、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆、医学数据库、英国护理索引、PsycInfo 和 CINAHL Plus 中检索文献。
纳入了在养老院实施预先护理计划干预的随机对照试验或整群随机对照试验,以及报告了临终结局并以英文发表的研究。排除了预先护理计划是更全面干预措施一部分的研究。使用随机效应荟萃分析模型评估结局为汇总比值比(OR)或标准化均数差(SMD)。进行了荟萃回归分析,以评估纳入研究的异质性。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具 2.0 评估纳入研究的方法学质量。
确定了 9 项试验,共纳入 2905 名参与者,样本量范围为 87 至 1292。涉及的养老院数量从 1 至 64 个不等。预先护理计划干预的类型不同,大多数研究对养老院工作人员进行了正式教育或培训,而其余研究则采用了培训师培训方法。纳入研究的质量参差不齐,其中 9 项研究中有 2 项在总体偏倚风险方面得分较低。我们的综合荟萃分析表明,存在中度异质性,预先护理计划干预显著增加了记录临终护理偏好的比例(OR=1.95,95%CI:1.64,2.32),但从家属的角度来看,并没有提高对临终护理的满意度(SMD=0.08,95%CI:-0.08,0.23)。荟萃回归未发现预先护理计划干预中的任何变量可以解释异质性。
预先护理计划干预通过增加记录的临终护理意愿数量,对养老院居民产生了有益的效果,但在从家属的角度来看,对临终护理的满意度方面没有效果。本综述强调需要更严格设计的实施研究来检验预先护理计划干预对养老院体弱老年人医疗保健结局的影响。