• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

YouTube® 上拇外翻视频的质量与内容分析

Quality and Content Analysis of Hallux Valgus Videos on YouTube®.

作者信息

Tekin Sezgin Bahadır, Bozgeyik Bahri

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey.

Kadirli State Hospital, Osmaniye, Turkey.

出版信息

J Foot Ankle Surg. 2023 Jan-Feb;62(1):85-90. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2022.05.003. Epub 2022 May 15.

DOI:10.1053/j.jfas.2022.05.003
PMID:35667941
Abstract

Our aim in this study is to analyze the content and quality of the videos about hallux valgus on YouTube®. The first 50 videos published by typing "hallux valgus" in the search engine on the YouTube® site were analyzed. The number of views of all videos, likes, dislikes, who uploaded the video, video duration, content, watch rate, and how many days it was uploaded were analyzed and recorded. All videos were analyzed with Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), DISCERN, GQS, and VPI scores. Six of the videos (12%) were from academic sources, 14 (28%) from commercial product vendors, 13 (26%) by medical animation organizers, 8 (16%) by physicians, 4 (8%) by physiotherapists, 2 (4%) by physical training trainers, 1 (2%) by patients, and last 2 (4%) by trainers. The JAMA mean score of the videos was recorded as 2 (1-4), GQS 3.02 (2-5), DISCERN score 37.56 (26-68), and Video Power Index 41.35 (0-470). The quality of YouTube® videos about hallux valgus is low. The content and quality of health-related information obtained through the Internet are of increasing importance for both healthcare professionals and patients.

摘要

本研究的目的是分析YouTube®上有关拇外翻的视频内容和质量。对在YouTube®网站搜索引擎中输入“拇外翻”后发布的前50个视频进行了分析。分析并记录了所有视频的观看次数、点赞数、点踩数、视频上传者、视频时长、内容、观看率以及上传天数。所有视频均采用美国医学会杂志(JAMA)、DISCERN、GQS和VPI评分进行分析。其中6个视频(12%)来自学术来源,14个(28%)来自商业产品供应商,13个(26%)由医学动画制作方提供,8个(16%)由医生提供,4个(8%)由物理治疗师提供,2个(4%)由体能训练教练提供,1个(2%)由患者提供,最后2个(4%)由培训师提供。视频的JAMA平均评分为2(1 - 4),GQS为3.02(2 - 5),DISCERN评分为37.56(26 - 68),视频影响力指数为41.35(0 - 470)。YouTube®上有关拇外翻的视频质量较低。通过互联网获取的与健康相关信息的内容和质量对医疗保健专业人员和患者都越来越重要。

相似文献

1
Quality and Content Analysis of Hallux Valgus Videos on YouTube®.YouTube® 上拇外翻视频的质量与内容分析
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2023 Jan-Feb;62(1):85-90. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2022.05.003. Epub 2022 May 15.
2
The videos on YouTube® related to hallux valgus surgery have insufficient information.YouTube®上有关拇外翻手术的视频信息不足。
Foot Ankle Surg. 2022 Jun;28(4):414-417. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2021.05.009. Epub 2021 May 18.
3
Quality Analysis of Hallux Valgus Videos on YouTube.YouTube 上的拇外翻视频质量分析。
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2021 Sep 1;111(5). doi: 10.7547/20-191.
4
Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of the Information on Rotator Cuff Repair on YouTube.评估 YouTube 上有关肩袖修复信息的质量和可靠性。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 Feb;106(1):31-34. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.10.004. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
5
A quality analysis of nocturnal enuresis videos on YouTube.YouTube 上遗尿症视频的质量分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Aug;17(4):449.e1-449.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.03.014. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
6
Evaluation of YouTube videos as a patient information source on intravitreal injection procedures.评估 YouTube 视频作为玻璃体腔内注射手术患者信息来源的价值。
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2022 Sep;45(7):748-755. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2022.02.023. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
7
Quality Assessment of YouTube Content on SLAP Tears.YouTube上关于SLAP撕裂伤内容的质量评估
Phys Sportsmed. 2023 Dec;51(6):582-589. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2022.2147805. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
8
A cross-sectional study on reliability and quality of YouTube® videos related to hallux valgus and evaluation of newly developed hallux valgus-specific survey tool.一项关于YouTube®上与拇外翻相关视频的可靠性和质量的横断面研究以及新开发的拇外翻特异性调查工具的评估。
Digit Health. 2023 Apr 20;9:20552076231171239. doi: 10.1177/20552076231171239. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
9
Evaluating the quality, utility, and reliability of the information in uveitis videos shared on YouTube.评估在YouTube上分享的葡萄膜炎视频中信息的质量、实用性和可靠性。
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Feb;43(2):549-555. doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02454-8. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
10
Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for neck pain: A YouTube-based quality-control study.基于 YouTube 的视频质量控制研究:在线视频资源在颈椎病患者教育中的质量。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 21;10:972348. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.972348. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
YouTube as a source of information on robotic knee replacement: a quality analysis.YouTube作为机器人辅助膝关节置换术信息来源的质量分析
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Aug 11;145(1):404. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-06024-2.
2
Platelet-rich plasma videos for knee osteoarthritis on YouTube are of acceptable quality and content.YouTube上关于膝骨关节炎的富血小板血浆视频在质量和内容方面是可以接受的。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jul 25;104(30):e43437. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043437.
3
Users' experience with health-related content on YouTube: an exploratory study.
用户在 YouTube 上获取健康相关内容的体验:一项探索性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 3;24(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17585-5.
4
A cross-sectional study on reliability and quality of YouTube® videos related to hallux valgus and evaluation of newly developed hallux valgus-specific survey tool.一项关于YouTube®上与拇外翻相关视频的可靠性和质量的横断面研究以及新开发的拇外翻特异性调查工具的评估。
Digit Health. 2023 Apr 20;9:20552076231171239. doi: 10.1177/20552076231171239. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.