• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

YouTube®上有关拇外翻手术的视频信息不足。

The videos on YouTube® related to hallux valgus surgery have insufficient information.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Orthopaedics, Basaksehir City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Foot Ankle Surg. 2022 Jun;28(4):414-417. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2021.05.009. Epub 2021 May 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.fas.2021.05.009
PMID:34034976
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have determined the videos on YouTube® have misleading information in medicine, however the assessment of the information for hallux valgus surgery is lacking.

METHODS

YouTube® was analyzed using two keywords as 'hallux valgus surgery' and 'bunion surgery'. Once redundancies were eliminated, each video was evaluated for the characteristic as following: duration, number of views, likes and dislikes, days since upload, view and like ratios and video power index (VPI). The quality of the information was evaluated using DISCERN, JAMA and hallux valgus score (HVS).

RESULTS

A total of 49 videos included. Fair or poor results for DISCERN and HVS (90% and 69% of videos, respectively) were found. No difference was found between video source and quality scores. Number of likes and VPI negatively correlated with all scores (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

YouTube® had poor quality of information for hallux valgus surgery.

摘要

背景

之前的研究已经确定 YouTube® 上的视频在医学方面存在误导性信息,但对拇外翻手术的信息评估却缺乏。

方法

使用两个关键字“拇外翻手术”和“囊炎手术”对 YouTube® 进行分析。消除冗余后,根据以下特征对每个视频进行评估:时长、浏览量、点赞和不喜欢的数量、上传天数、浏览量和点赞比例以及视频功率指数(VPI)。使用 DISCERN、JAMA 和拇外翻评分(HVS)评估信息质量。

结果

共纳入 49 个视频。DISCERN 和 HVS 的结果为中等或较差(分别为 90%和 69%的视频)。视频来源与质量评分之间没有差异。点赞数量和 VPI 与所有评分呈负相关(p<0.001)。

结论

YouTube® 上有关拇外翻手术的信息质量较差。

相似文献

1
The videos on YouTube® related to hallux valgus surgery have insufficient information.YouTube®上有关拇外翻手术的视频信息不足。
Foot Ankle Surg. 2022 Jun;28(4):414-417. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2021.05.009. Epub 2021 May 18.
2
Quality and Content Analysis of Hallux Valgus Videos on YouTube®.YouTube® 上拇外翻视频的质量与内容分析
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2023 Jan-Feb;62(1):85-90. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2022.05.003. Epub 2022 May 15.
3
Quality Analysis of Hallux Valgus Videos on YouTube.YouTube 上的拇外翻视频质量分析。
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2021 Sep 1;111(5). doi: 10.7547/20-191.
4
Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of the Information on Rotator Cuff Repair on YouTube.评估 YouTube 上有关肩袖修复信息的质量和可靠性。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 Feb;106(1):31-34. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.10.004. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
5
YouTube as a source of information on fibromyalgia.YouTube 作为纤维肌痛信息来源。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2021 Feb;24(2):197-202. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.14043. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
6
Quality of Information Available on YouTube Videos Pertaining to Thyroid Cancer.YouTube 视频中有关甲状腺癌信息的质量。
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Jun;35(3):599-605. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-01502-9.
7
A quality analysis of nocturnal enuresis videos on YouTube.YouTube 上遗尿症视频的质量分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Aug;17(4):449.e1-449.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.03.014. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
8
Analysis of the quality, reliability, and popularity of information on strabismus on YouTube.分析 YouTube 上斜视相关信息的质量、可靠性和普及度。
Strabismus. 2020 Dec;28(4):175-180. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2020.1836002. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
9
Quality Assessment of YouTube Videos as an Information Source for Testicular Torsion.YouTube 视频作为睾丸扭转信息来源的质量评估。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 18;10:905609. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.905609. eCollection 2022.
10
The Reliability of Bariatric Surgery Videos in YouTube Platform.YouTube平台上减肥手术视频的可靠性
Obes Surg. 2018 Mar;28(3):712-716. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2911-3.

引用本文的文献

1
YouTube as a source of information on robotic knee replacement: a quality analysis.YouTube作为机器人辅助膝关节置换术信息来源的质量分析
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Aug 11;145(1):404. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-06024-2.
2
The quality and reliability of YouTube and TikTok videos on epidural blood patch: A cross-sectional analysis.YouTube和TikTok上关于硬膜外血贴的视频的质量和可靠性:一项横断面分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Aug 1;104(31):e43628. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043628.
3
Platelet-rich plasma videos for knee osteoarthritis on YouTube are of acceptable quality and content.
YouTube上关于膝骨关节炎的富血小板血浆视频在质量和内容方面是可以接受的。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jul 25;104(30):e43437. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043437.
4
Evaluating the quality of osteonecrosis and avascular necrosis content on youtube: a multidimensional analysis using DISCERN, JAMA, and GQS tools.评估YouTube上关于骨坏死和缺血性坏死内容的质量:使用DISCERN、《美国医学会杂志》和GQS工具进行的多维度分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jul 22;20(1):695. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06116-0.
5
Analysis of Plantar Fasciitis Videos on YouTube: Quality and Reliability Assessment.YouTube上足底筋膜炎视频的分析:质量与可靠性评估
Cureus. 2025 Feb 14;17(2):e78993. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78993. eCollection 2025 Feb.
6
Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of YouTube as an Information Source for Transforaminal Interbody Fusion.评估YouTube作为经椎间孔椎间融合术信息来源的质量和可靠性。
Cureus. 2023 Dec 9;15(12):e50210. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50210. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
A cross-sectional study on reliability and quality of YouTube® videos related to hallux valgus and evaluation of newly developed hallux valgus-specific survey tool.一项关于YouTube®上与拇外翻相关视频的可靠性和质量的横断面研究以及新开发的拇外翻特异性调查工具的评估。
Digit Health. 2023 Apr 20;9:20552076231171239. doi: 10.1177/20552076231171239. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
8
Systematic Assessment of the Quality and Comprehensibility of YouTube Content on Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injury and Management.YouTube上关于尺侧副韧带损伤与治疗内容的质量及可理解性的系统评估
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Mar 21;11(3):23259671221147921. doi: 10.1177/23259671221147921. eCollection 2023 Mar.