China Center for Public Sector Economy Research, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
School of Economics, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Front Public Health. 2022 May 20;10:865699. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.865699. eCollection 2022.
The outbreak of COVID-19 has brought a serious impact on the economies of various countries, monetary policy needs to play a role in stimulating economic recovery when the economy encounters a serious negative impact. Since the recurrent outbreak of COVID-19 has caused great obstacles to the normal economic exchanges between countries, it has become particularly important to build the domestic market and optimize the industrial allocation at this time. This paper focuses on studying the dynamic impact of China's monetary policy implementation on the industrial structure during the pandemic. Based on the data of the eight major economic zones in Mainland China and the dataset containing many of China's macroeconomic variables, a SV-TVP-FAVAR model is established. The manuscript compares the time-varying effects of monetary policy tools on the industries at different stages before and after the epidemic. The study supported some interesting conclusions. (1) Either the quantitative or price-based monetary policy shocks have significant time-varying impacts on the industries in different economic zones. The impacts of monetary policy on the primary, secondary, and tertiary industries in each economic zone are uneven. (2) The developed Northern, Eastern, and Southern coastal economic zones in Mainland China are more sensitive to the changes in monetary policy. (3) COVID-19 has brought a tremendous negative shock on the economy, which has destroyed the original steady-state of the economic system and added more uncertainty to the regulatory effect of monetary policy. Compared with other periods in China's economic history that severely negatively impacted (the Southeast Asian financial crisis and the global economic crisis), industries in most economic zones under the COVID-19 epidemic have been affected by monetary policy for a longer lag time. Therefore, for the implementation of monetary policy, at the moment of COVID-19 epidemic, we should pay more attention to the dual-pillar role of macro-prudential regulation, further improve the process of China's interest rate reform, enrich the monetary toolbox, and implement differentiated monetary policies in line with the economic zone's position, to optimize the regional industrial structure, and promote long-term economic growth.
新冠疫情的爆发对各国经济造成了严重影响,当经济遭遇严重负面冲击时,货币政策需要在刺激经济复苏方面发挥作用。由于新冠疫情的反复爆发给各国之间的正常经济交流造成了巨大障碍,此时构建国内市场和优化产业配置就显得尤为重要。本文重点研究了疫情期间中国货币政策实施对产业结构的动态影响。基于中国大陆八大经济区的数据以及包含中国许多宏观经济变量的数据集,建立了 SV-TVP-FAVAR 模型。本文比较了疫情前后货币政策工具对不同阶段产业的时变效应。研究支持了一些有趣的结论。(1)无论是数量型还是价格型货币政策冲击,对不同经济区的产业都具有显著的时变影响。货币政策对各经济区一、二、三次产业的影响是不均匀的。(2)中国大陆发达的北方、东部和南部沿海经济区对货币政策变化更为敏感。(3)新冠疫情给经济带来了巨大的负面冲击,破坏了经济系统的原有稳态,增加了货币政策调控效果的不确定性。与中国经济史上其他经济遭受严重负面影响的时期(东南亚金融危机和全球经济危机)相比,在新冠疫情下,大多数经济区的产业受到货币政策的影响时间更长。因此,对于货币政策的实施,在新冠疫情时期,我们应该更加注重宏观审慎监管的双重支柱作用,进一步完善中国利率改革进程,丰富货币政策工具箱,并根据经济区的地位实施差异化的货币政策,优化区域产业结构,促进长期经济增长。