Casanova Amparo, Vives-Mestres Marina, Donoghue Stephen, Mian Alec, Martin Paul R
Curelator Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Universitat de Girona, Girona, Spain.
Headache. 2022 Nov;62(10):1406-1415. doi: 10.1111/head.14328. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
To investigate the relationship between self-reported triggers and the occurrence of migraine attacks using a smartphone application.
One of several issues around the study of migraine attack triggers is that limited available evidence supports whether self-reported triggers can induce a headache on a particular subject.
This is an observational longitudinal cohort study of individuals with migraine registered to track their headaches prospectively using a smartphone application. For 90 days, participants entered daily data about triggers (potential triggers and premonitory symptoms) that may be associated with attack risk, as well as migraine symptoms. The statistical significance of univariate associations between each trigger and migraine recurrent events was determined for each individual. Statistically identified triggers were then compared to self-reported triggers.
In 328 individuals (290/328 [88.4%] female; mean [standard deviation] 4.2 [1.5] migraine attacks/month) the mean (standard deviation) number of triggers moderately or highly endorsed per individual was 28.0 (7.7) in individuals presented with up to 38 possible triggers. Of these, an average (standard deviation) of 2.2 (2.1) triggers per individual were statistically associated with increased risk of attacks. Even the most commonly endorsed triggers (sleep quality, stress, tiredness/fatigue, sleep duration, dehydration, neck pain, missed meals, eyestrain, mean barometric pressure, and anxiety) were statistically associated in fewer than one third of individuals suspecting each, with the exception of neck pain (117/302 [38.7%]).
Individuals with episodic migraine believe that many triggers contribute to their attacks; however, few of these withstand statistical testing at the individual level. Improved personal knowledge of potential triggers and premonitory symptoms may help individuals adopt behavioral changes to mitigate attack risk.
使用智能手机应用程序研究自我报告的诱发因素与偏头痛发作之间的关系。
偏头痛发作诱发因素研究中的若干问题之一是,现有证据有限,无法支持自我报告的诱发因素是否会在特定个体身上引发头痛。
这是一项针对偏头痛患者的观察性纵向队列研究,这些患者注册使用智能手机应用程序前瞻性地跟踪他们的头痛情况。在90天内,参与者每天输入可能与发作风险相关的诱发因素(潜在诱发因素和先兆症状)以及偏头痛症状的数据。确定每个个体中每个诱发因素与偏头痛复发事件之间单变量关联的统计学显著性。然后将经统计学确定的诱发因素与自我报告的诱发因素进行比较。
在328名个体中(290/328 [88.4%] 为女性;平均 [标准差] 每月偏头痛发作4.2 [1.5] 次),在呈现多达38种可能诱发因素的个体中,每个个体中度或高度认可的诱发因素平均数(标准差)为28.0(7.7)。其中,每个个体平均(标准差)有2.2(2.1)个诱发因素与发作风险增加在统计学上相关。即使是最常被认可的诱发因素(睡眠质量、压力、疲倦/疲劳、睡眠时间、脱水、颈部疼痛、未进食、眼疲劳、平均气压和焦虑),除颈部疼痛外(117/302 [38.7%]),在怀疑有这些诱发因素的个体中,与发作风险增加在统计学上相关的个体比例均不到三分之一。
发作性偏头痛患者认为许多诱发因素会导致他们发作;然而,在个体层面上,这些诱发因素中很少能经受住统计学检验。更好地了解潜在诱发因素和先兆症状可能有助于个体采取行为改变来降低发作风险。