• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾外伤行肾切除术的预测因素;六点评分法评估

Predictive factors for nephrectomy in renal trauma; assessment of a 6-point score.

作者信息

Pallares-Mendez Rigoberto, Cervantes-Miranda Daniel Eduardo, Castillo-Godinez Evelyn Susana, de la Cruz-de la Cruz Carlos, Aguilar-Méndez Marco Antonio, Gutierrez-Gonzalez Adrian, Mendoza-Castillo Fernando, Mata-Torres Héctor, Ochoa-Arvizo Mario, Montelongo-Rodriguez Fred, Hernandez-Aranda Katherine Lyn, Cota-Agüero Jesús Arturo

机构信息

Department of Urology, Facultad de Medicina y Hospital Universitario "Dr. Jose Eleuterio Gonzalez". Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Av. Madero y Gonzalitos S/N, Mitras Centro, C.P. 64460, Monterrey, Mexico.

Department of Urology, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara "Fray Antonio Alcalde", Guadalajara, Mexico.

出版信息

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Oct;49(5):2241-2248. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02006-w. Epub 2022 Jun 7.

DOI:10.1007/s00068-022-02006-w
PMID:35670816
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate predictive and associated risk factors for nephrectomy in renal trauma and assess a 6-point score for surgical decision-making.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective, and observational study assessed 247 subjects with blunt or penetrating kidney trauma. Kidney injuries were classified according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Injury Scoring Scale. Renal trauma was classified as "low-grade" (Grades I-III), Grade IV, and Grade V. Subjects were compared according to conservative treatment (CTrt.) or nephrectomy. Predictive factors were evaluated with a multiple regression model. A 6-point score was evaluated with a ROC analysis.

RESULTS

Patients requiring nephrectomy had a lower mean arterial pressure MAP compared to CTrt, 64.71 mmHg (SD ± 10.26) and 73.86 (SD ± 12.42), respectively (p =  < 0.001). A response to IV solutions was observed in 90.2% of patients undergoing CTrt. (p =  < 0.001, OR = 0.211, 95%CI = 0.101-0.442). Blood lactate ≥ 4 mmol/L was associated with nephrectomy (p =  < 0.001). A hematoma ≥ 25 mm was observed in 41.5% of patients undergoing nephrectomy compared to 20.1% of CTrt. (p = 0.004, OR = 9.29, 95% CI = 1.37-5.58). A logistic regression analysis (p =  < 0.001) showed that blood lactate ≥ 4 mmol/L (p = 0.043), an inadequate response to IV solutions (p = 0.041) and renal trauma grade IV-V (p =  < 0.001), predicted nephrectomy. A 6-point score with a cut-off value ≥ 3 points showed 83% sensitivity and 87% specificity for nephrectomy with an AUC of 89.9% (p =  < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

An inadequate response to IV solutions, a lactate level ≥ 4 mmol/L, and grade IV-V renal trauma predict nephrectomy. A score ≥ 3 points showed a good performance in this population.

摘要

目的

评估肾外伤患者肾切除术的预测因素和相关危险因素,并评估用于手术决策的6分评分系统。

患者与方法

这项多中心、回顾性观察研究评估了247例钝性或穿透性肾外伤患者。肾损伤根据美国创伤外科协会(AAST)损伤评分量表进行分类。肾外伤分为“低级别”(I-III级)、IV级和V级。根据保守治疗(CTrt.)或肾切除术对患者进行比较。采用多元回归模型评估预测因素。通过ROC分析评估6分评分系统。

结果

与接受保守治疗的患者相比,需要进行肾切除术的患者平均动脉压(MAP)较低,分别为64.71 mmHg(标准差±10.26)和73.86(标准差±12.42)(p = <0.001)。90.2%接受保守治疗的患者对静脉输液有反应(p = <0.001,OR = 0.211,95%CI = 0.101-0.442)。血乳酸≥4 mmol/L与肾切除术相关(p = <0.001)。接受肾切除术的患者中41.5%观察到血肿≥25 mm,而接受保守治疗的患者中这一比例为20.1%(p = 0.004,OR = 9.29,95%CI = 1.37-5.58)。逻辑回归分析(p = <0.001)显示,血乳酸≥4 mmol/L(p = 0.043)、对静脉输液反应不足(p = 0.041)和肾外伤IV-V级(p = <0.001)可预测肾切除术。截断值≥3分的6分评分系统对肾切除术的敏感性为83%,特异性为87%,曲线下面积(AUC)为89.9%(p = <0.001)。

结论

对静脉输液反应不足、乳酸水平≥4 mmol/L和IV-V级肾外伤可预测肾切除术。评分≥3分在该人群中表现良好。

相似文献

1
Predictive factors for nephrectomy in renal trauma; assessment of a 6-point score.肾外伤行肾切除术的预测因素;六点评分法评估
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Oct;49(5):2241-2248. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02006-w. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
2
The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Organ Injury Scale is Associated With Cystoscopic and Percutaneous Urologic Procedures in Renal Injuries.美国创伤外科学会器官损伤分级与经皮肾镜和膀胱镜在肾损伤中的应用相关。
Am Surg. 2023 Aug;89(8):3385-3389. doi: 10.1177/00031348231161712. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
3
Contemporary management of high-grade renal trauma: Results from the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Genitourinary Trauma study.当代高级别肾创伤的处理:美国创伤外科学会泌尿生殖系统创伤研究的结果。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Mar;84(3):418-425. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001796.
4
Utility and Outcome of Angioembolization for High-Grade Renal Trauma Management in a Large Hospital-Based Trauma Registry.血管栓塞术在大型医院创伤登记系统中用于治疗高级别肾创伤的效果和结果。
J Urol. 2022 May;207(5):1077-1085. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002424. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
5
Predictors of the need for nephrectomy after renal trauma.肾外伤后肾切除术需求的预测因素。
J Trauma. 2006 Jan;60(1):164-9; discussion 169-70. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000199924.39736.36.
6
Trends and outcomes of blunt renal trauma management: a nationwide cohort study in Japan.日本全国队列研究:钝性肾损伤处理的趋势和结果。
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Aug 26;15(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00329-w.
7
American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Organ Injury Scale for kidney injuries predicts nephrectomy, dialysis, and death in patients with blunt injury and nephrectomy for penetrating injuries.美国创伤外科协会肾脏损伤器官损伤评分可预测钝性损伤患者的肾切除术、透析和死亡情况,以及穿透性损伤患者的肾切除术。
J Trauma. 2006 Feb;60(2):351-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000202509.32188.72.
8
Renal trauma in a Trauma Intensive Care Unit population.创伤重症监护病房患者中的肾损伤
S Afr J Surg. 2019 Dec;57(4):29-32.
9
Selective management of isolated and nonisolated grade IV renal injuries.孤立性和非孤立性IV级肾损伤的选择性处理
J Urol. 2006 Dec;176(6 Pt 1):2498-502; discussion 2502. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.141.
10
Renal injury management in an urban trauma centre and implications for urological training.城市创伤中心的肾损伤管理及其对泌尿外科培训的影响。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2015 Apr;97(3):194-7. doi: 10.1308/003588414X14055925061117.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical and Radiographic Factors Associated With Failed Renal Angioembolization: Results From the Multi-institutional Genitourinary Trauma Study (Mi-GUTS).与肾动脉栓塞术失败相关的临床和影像学因素:来自多机构泌尿生殖系统创伤研究(Mi-GUTS)的结果。
Urology. 2021 Feb;148:287-291. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.10.027. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
2
Urotrauma Guideline 2020: AUA Guideline.尿创伤指南 2020:AUA 指南。
J Urol. 2021 Jan;205(1):30-35. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001408. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
3
The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Organ Injury Scale 2018 update for computed tomography-based grading of renal trauma: a primer for the emergency radiologist.
美国创伤外科学会2018年基于计算机断层扫描的肾创伤分级器官损伤量表更新:急诊放射科医生入门指南。
Emerg Radiol. 2020 Feb;27(1):63-73. doi: 10.1007/s10140-019-01721-z. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
4
Renal Trauma Classification and Management: Validating the Revised Renal Injury Grading Scale.肾脏创伤分类与处理:验证改良肾脏损伤分级标准。
J Urol. 2019 Nov;202(5):994-1000. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000358. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
5
Penetrating Renal Trauma: Nonoperative Management Is Safe in Selected Patients.穿透性肾损伤:部分患者非手术治疗安全可行。
Am Surg. 2019 Mar 1;85(3):266-272.
6
Renal trauma: the current best practice.肾创伤:当前的最佳实践
Ther Adv Urol. 2018 Jul 10;10(10):295-303. doi: 10.1177/1756287218785828. eCollection 2018 Oct.
7
Managing penetrating renal trauma: experience from two major trauma centres in the UK.处理穿透性肾创伤:来自英国两个主要创伤中心的经验。
BJU Int. 2018 Jun;121(6):928-934. doi: 10.1111/bju.14165. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
8
Conservative Management of High-grade Renal Trauma Does Not Lead to Prolonged Hospital Stay.高级别肾损伤的保守治疗不会导致住院时间延长。
Urology. 2018 May;115:92-95. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.11.018. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
9
"Management of blunt renal injury: what is new?".钝性肾损伤的管理:有哪些新进展?
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015 Jun;41(3):251-8. doi: 10.1007/s00068-015-0516-x. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
10
Guideline of guidelines: a review of urological trauma guidelines.指南之指南:泌尿外科创伤指南综述
BJU Int. 2016 Feb;117(2):226-34. doi: 10.1111/bju.13040. Epub 2015 Jul 6.