• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性别差异与健康老龄化:2006 年至 2016 年美国和韩国的跨国比较研究。

Gender Disparities in Healthy Aging: A Cross-National Comparative Study in the United States and South Korea from 2006 to 2016.

机构信息

Economics and Political Science Department, 7567St. Catherine University, St Paul, MN, USA.

Biology Department, St. Catherine University, St Paul, MN, USA.

出版信息

Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2023 Jan;96(1):33-50. doi: 10.1177/00914150221106643. Epub 2022 Jun 7.

DOI:10.1177/00914150221106643
PMID:35673267
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11166184/
Abstract

Using the 2006-2016 wave of Health and Retirement Study and Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging, this study explores the gender disparities in the health of older adults in the United States and South Korea. A logit model is adopted to explore the differences in the likelihood of aging healthily by gender in two countries. Results indicate that older females in the United States have a significantly higher probability of healthy aging than their male counterparts. However, the opposite finding is demonstrated among the older population in South Korea. These results are verified using various robustness check methods. The heterogeneities in the gender disparities in healthy aging across age groups and income levels are further explored. The gender effect in each healthy aging domain is investigated to understand the underlying causes of gender disparities. These findings can provide cross-national insights for policymakers to establish targeted aging policies with a gender perspective.

摘要

利用 2006-2016 年的美国健康与退休研究和韩国老龄化纵向研究的数据,本研究探讨了美国和韩国老年人口健康方面的性别差异。采用逻辑回归模型探讨了两国中男性和女性健康老龄化的可能性差异。结果表明,美国的老年女性比男性更有可能健康老龄化。然而,在韩国的老年人群中却出现了相反的结果。这些结果通过各种稳健性检验方法得到了验证。进一步探讨了不同年龄组和收入水平下健康老龄化性别差异的异质性。研究了每个健康老龄化领域的性别效应,以了解性别差异的根本原因。这些发现可以为政策制定者提供跨国的视角,制定具有性别意识的针对性的老龄化政策。

相似文献

1
Gender Disparities in Healthy Aging: A Cross-National Comparative Study in the United States and South Korea from 2006 to 2016.性别差异与健康老龄化:2006 年至 2016 年美国和韩国的跨国比较研究。
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2023 Jan;96(1):33-50. doi: 10.1177/00914150221106643. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
2
Does Gender Matter in the Receipt of Informal Care Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults? Evidence from a Cross-National Comparative Study Across the United States, South Korea, and China.性别在社区居住的老年人接受非正式护理方面是否重要?来自美国、韩国和中国的跨国比较研究的证据。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Jun 8;76(Suppl 1):S64-S75. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa018.
3
Gender inequalities in poor self-rated health: Cross-national comparison of South Korea and Japan.性别不平等与自评健康较差:韩国和日本的跨国比较。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 May;252:112919. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112919. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
4
Comparisons of the Association of Family and Social Factors With Functional Limitations Across the United States, Mexico, and South Korea: Findings From the HRS Family of Surveys.比较美、墨、韩三国家庭和社会因素与功能障碍的关联:来自 HRS 家庭调查系列的研究结果。
J Aging Health. 2020 Oct;32(9):1042-1051. doi: 10.1177/0898264319878549. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
5
Educational Inequalities in Ill-Health Retirement Among Middle- and Older-Aged Workers in Korea: The Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging (2006-2016).韩国中老年工人不良健康退休的教育不平等:韩国老龄化纵向研究(2006-2016 年)
J Occup Environ Med. 2021 Jun 1;63(6):e323-e329. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002200.
6
The Effects of Life Changes in Family on Engagement in Economic Activities Among Female Older Adults: A Comparative Study Between China and South Korea.家庭生活变化对中老年女性参与经济活动的影响:中、韩比较研究。
J Appl Gerontol. 2023 Nov;42(11):2242-2251. doi: 10.1177/07334648231180846. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
7
The effect of employment transitions on physical health among the elderly in South Korea: A longitudinal analysis of the Korean Retirement and Income Study.韩国老年人就业转型对其身体健康的影响:基于韩国退休与收入研究的纵向分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 May;181:122-130. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.04.002. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
8
Cross-national gender differences in the socioeconomic factors associated with smoking in Australia, the United States of America and South Korea.跨国家性别差异与吸烟相关的社会经济因素在澳大利亚、美国和韩国。
Int J Public Health. 2013 Jun;58(3):345-53. doi: 10.1007/s00038-012-0430-5. Epub 2012 Dec 1.
9
Education and wealth inequalities in healthy ageing in eight harmonised cohorts in the ATHLOS consortium: a population-based study.ATHLOS 联盟八个协调队列中健康老龄化的教育和财富不平等:基于人群的研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Jul;5(7):e386-e394. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30077-3.
10
Socioeconomic disparities in behavioral risk factors and health outcomes by gender in the Republic of Korea.韩国不同性别在行为风险因素和健康结果方面的社会经济差异。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Apr 15;10:195. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-195.

引用本文的文献

1
Gender differences in advanced activities of daily living: evidence from the longitudinal study of health and aging in Mexico 2012-2018.日常生活高级活动中的性别差异:来自2012 - 2018年墨西哥健康与老龄化纵向研究的证据
Front Aging. 2025 Jul 28;6:1544493. doi: 10.3389/fragi.2025.1544493. eCollection 2025.
2
Regional differences in the Association of Healthy Aging with the incidence of falls: an analysis based on the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study from 2011 to 2020.健康老龄化与跌倒发生率关联的地区差异:基于 2011 年至 2020 年中国健康与养老追踪调查的分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 23;12:1416214. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1416214. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of Multiple Chronic Conditions Among US Adults, 2018.2018 年美国成年人多重慢性病患病率。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Sep 17;17:E106. doi: 10.5888/pcd17.200130.
2
Geriatrics Fact Sheet in Korea 2018 From National Statistics.2018年韩国老年医学概况介绍 源自国家统计数据。
Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2019 Jun;23(2):50-53. doi: 10.4235/agmr.19.0013. Epub 2019 Jun 30.
3
Loneliness and Health: The Moderating Effect of Cross-Cultural Individualism/Collectivism.孤独感与健康:跨文化个体主义/集体主义的调节作用。
Sex-difference in the association between social drinking, structural brain aging and cognitive function in older individuals free of cognitive impairment.
无认知障碍的老年人中,社交饮酒、大脑结构老化与认知功能之间关联的性别差异。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Apr 8;15:1235171. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1235171. eCollection 2024.
4
Regional differences in the effects of healthy aging on depressive symptoms: a Korean longitudinal study of aging (2006-2020).健康老龄化对抑郁症状影响的区域性差异:一项韩国老龄化纵向研究(2006-2020 年)。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 16;12:1256368. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1256368. eCollection 2024.
J Aging Health. 2020 Dec;32(10):1516-1527. doi: 10.1177/0898264320943336. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
4
Social Value Orientation and Endorsement of Horizontal and Vertical Individualism and Collectivism: An Exploratory Study Comparing Individuals From North America and South Korea.社会价值取向与对水平和垂直个人主义及集体主义的认同:一项比较北美和韩国个体的探索性研究。
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 20;9:2262. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02262. eCollection 2018.
5
Social integration and healthy aging among U.S. women.美国女性的社会融合与健康老龄化
Prev Med Rep. 2018 Jan 31;9:144-148. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.01.013. eCollection 2018 Mar.
6
Prevalence and correlates of successful ageing: a comparative study between China and South Korea.成功老龄化的患病率及其相关因素:中国与韩国的比较研究。
Eur J Ageing. 2014 Dec 25;12(2):83-94. doi: 10.1007/s10433-014-0329-5. eCollection 2015 Jun.
7
Gender gap in health expectancy.健康预期寿命方面的性别差异。
Eur J Ageing. 2010 Nov 4;7(4):213-218. doi: 10.1007/s10433-010-0170-4. eCollection 2010 Dec.
8
The impact of living arrangements on quality of life among Korean elderly: findings from the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging (2006-2012).居住安排对韩国老年人生活质量的影响:来自韩国老龄化纵向研究(2006 - 2012年)的发现
Qual Life Res. 2017 May;26(5):1303-1314. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1448-6. Epub 2016 Nov 5.
9
Determinants of Poor Self-rated Health in Korean Adults With Diabetes.韩国糖尿病成年人自我健康评价较差的影响因素
J Prev Med Public Health. 2015 Nov;48(6):287-300. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.15.048. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
10
Risk factors related to cognitive functioning: a cross-national comparison of U.S. and Korean older adults.与认知功能相关的风险因素:美国和韩国老年人的跨国比较。
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2014;79(1):81-101.