University of Colorado, College of Nursing, Aurora, Colorado, United States.
School of Nursing, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, United States.
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 May;13(3):621-631. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1749598. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
Hospital-acquired conditions (HACs) are common, costly, and national patient safety priority. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), hospital-acquired pressure injury (HAPI), and falls are common HACs. Clinicians assess each HAC risk independent of other conditions. Prevention strategies often focus on the reduction of a single HAC rather than considering how actions to prevent one condition could have unintended consequences for another HAC.
The objective of this study is to design an empirical framework to identify, assess, and quantify the risks of multiple HACs (MHACs) related to competing single-HAC interventions.
This study was an Institutional Review Board approved, and the proof of concept study evaluated MHAC Competing Risk Dashboard to enhance clinicians' management combining the risks of CAUTI, HAPI, and falls. The empirical model informing this study focused on the removal of an indwelling urinary catheter to reduce CAUTI, which may impact HAPI and falls. A multisite database was developed to understand and quantify competing risks of HACs; a predictive model dashboard was designed and clinical utility of a high-fidelity dashboard was qualitatively tested. Five hospital systems provided data for the predictive model prototype; three served as sites for testing and feedback on the dashboard design and usefulness. The participatory study design involved think-aloud methods as the clinician explored the dashboard. Individual interviews provided an understanding of clinician's perspective regarding ease of use and utility.
Twenty-five clinicians were interviewed. Clinicians favored a dashboard gauge design composed of green, yellow, and red segments to depict MHAC risk associated with the removal of an indwelling urinary catheter to reduce CAUTI and possible adverse effects on HAPI and falls.
Participants endorsed the utility of a visual dashboard guiding clinical decisions for MHAC risks preferring common stoplight color understanding. Clinicians did not want mandatory alerts for tool integration into the electronic health record. More research is needed to understand MHAC and tools to guide clinician decisions.
医院获得性疾病(HAC)较为常见,且耗费巨大,是国家层面的患者安全重点。导尿管相关性尿路感染(CAUTI)、医院获得性压疮(HAPI)和跌倒都是常见的 HAC。临床医生会独立评估每种 HAC 风险,而不会考虑预防一种 HAC 的策略可能会对另一种 HAC 产生意想不到的后果。
本研究旨在设计一个经验性框架,以识别、评估和量化与竞争单 HAC 干预相关的多种 HAC(MHAC)的风险。
这项研究获得了机构审查委员会的批准,概念验证研究评估了 MHAC 竞争风险仪表板,以增强临床医生结合 CAUTI、HAPI 和跌倒风险进行管理的能力。为这项研究提供信息的经验模型侧重于移除留置导尿管以降低 CAUTI 的风险,这可能会影响 HAPI 和跌倒的风险。开发了一个多站点数据库来了解和量化 HAC 的竞争风险;设计了一个预测模型仪表板,并对高保真仪表板的临床实用性进行了定性测试。五个医院系统为预测模型原型提供了数据;其中三个系统作为测试和反馈仪表板设计和有用性的地点。参与式研究设计包括在临床医生探索仪表板时进行的出声思考方法。个人访谈提供了对临床医生关于易用性和实用性的看法的理解。
共对 25 名临床医生进行了访谈。临床医生喜欢使用仪表盘仪表的设计,由绿色、黄色和红色段组成,以描述与移除留置导尿管以降低 CAUTI 相关的 MHAC 风险,以及对 HAPI 和跌倒可能产生的不利影响。
参与者认可使用可视化仪表板来指导 MHAC 风险的临床决策,更喜欢使用常见的交通信号灯颜色来理解。临床医生不希望将工具集成到电子健康记录中时强制发出警报。需要进一步研究以了解 MHAC 和指导临床医生决策的工具。