Suppr超能文献

运用 PDSA 框架进行质量改进,开发 VA 老年学者计划的临床仪表盘。

Developing the VA Geriatric Scholars Programs' Clinical Dashboards Using the PDSA Framework for Quality Improvement.

机构信息

Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States.

Informatics, Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Centers of Innovation (COIN), Salt Lake City Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States.

出版信息

Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Aug;13(4):961-970. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1757553. Epub 2022 Oct 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Involving clinician end users in the development process of clinical dashboards is important to ensure that user needs are adequately met prior to releasing the dashboard for use. The challenge with following this approach is that clinician end users can undergo periodic turnover, meaning, the clinicians that played a role in the initial development process may not be the same individuals that use the dashboard in future.

OBJECTIVES

Here, we summarize our Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA)-guided clinical dashboard development process for the VA Geriatric Scholars Program (GSP) and the value of continuous, iterative development. We summarize dashboard adaptations that resulted from two PDSA cycles of improvement for the potentially inappropriate medication dashboard (PIMD), one of many Geriatric Scholars clinical dashboards. We also present the evaluative performance of the PIMD.

METHODS

Evaluation of the PIMD was performed using the system usability scale (SUS) and through review of user interaction logs. Routine end users that were Geriatric Scholars and had evidence of 5 or more dashboard views were invited to complete an electronic form that contained the 10-item SUS.

RESULTS

The proportion of Geriatric Scholars that utilized the PIMD increased for each iterative dashboard version that was produced as a byproduct from feedback (31.0% in 2017 to 60.2% in 2019). The overall usability of the PIMD among routine users was found to be above average (SUS score: 75.2 [95% CI 70.5-79.8]) in comparison to the recommended standard of acceptability (SUS score: 68) CONCLUSION:  The solicitation of feedback during dashboard orientations led to iterative adaptations of the PIMD that broadened its intended use. The presented PDSA-guided process to clinical dashboard development for the VA GSP can serve as a valuable framework for development teams seeking to produce well-adopted and usable health information technology (IT) innovations.

摘要

背景

让临床医生终端用户参与临床仪表盘的开发过程对于确保在发布仪表盘供使用之前充分满足用户需求非常重要。遵循这种方法的挑战在于,临床医生终端用户可能会定期更换,这意味着在初始开发过程中发挥作用的临床医生可能与未来使用仪表盘的临床医生不同。

目的

在这里,我们总结了 VA 老年学者计划(GSP)的基于计划-执行-研究-行动(PDSA)的临床仪表盘开发过程及其持续迭代开发的价值。我们总结了潜在不适当药物仪表盘(PIMD)进行了两轮 PDSA 改进后的适应性调整,PIMD 是众多老年学者临床仪表盘之一。我们还介绍了 PIMD 的评估性能。

方法

使用系统可用性量表(SUS)和用户交互日志审查来评估 PIMD。邀请常规使用老年学者且有 5 次或以上仪表盘查看记录的终端用户填写一份包含 10 个项目的 SUS 的电子表格。

结果

作为反馈的副产品,每次迭代的仪表盘版本都会产生更多的老年学者使用 PIMD(2017 年为 31.0%,2019 年为 60.2%)。与可接受的标准(SUS 评分:68)相比,常规用户对 PIMD 的总体可用性评价较高(SUS 评分:75.2 [95% CI 70.5-79.8])。

结论

在仪表盘介绍期间征求反馈意见,导致 PIMD 进行了迭代调整,从而扩大了其预期用途。本文介绍的 VA GSP 临床仪表盘开发的 PDSA 指导流程可为寻求开发广泛采用和可用的健康信息技术(IT)创新的开发团队提供有价值的框架。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8eec/9556171/d81ddfe3e794/10-1055-s-0042-1757553-i202204soa0121-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验