• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

指导型仆人式领导:量表的开发与验证

Coaching Servant Leadership: Scale Development and Validation.

作者信息

Takamatsu Shohei

机构信息

Faculty of Education, Kobe Shinwa Women's University, Kobe, Japan.

出版信息

Front Sports Act Living. 2022 May 18;4:871495. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.871495. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fspor.2022.871495
PMID:35677359
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9169236/
Abstract

This study aimed to develop a valid and reliable scale for measuring coaching servant leadership in different contexts (Japan and the United States). First, potential items were collected in Japan using both deductive (i.e., literature review) and inductive (i.e., surveys among 103 coaches and 34 university students) approaches and narrowed down via content validity assessment by 10 experts. Next, quantitative studies were conducted to validate the scale's construct validity, among 936 high school athletes from Japan. Finally, the scale's applicability to the US context was demonstrated, among 278 university athletes in the US. The analyses resulted in a six-factor model with 17 items to assess coaching servant leadership behaviors: (1) acceptance; (2) shared vision; (3) empowerment; (4) dedication; (5) humility; and (6) winning second. In conclusion, this study developed a coaching servant leadership scale by applying both deductive and inductive approaches and deemed it applicable not only in Japan but also in the US. It is anticipated that future studies will examine the impact of coaching servant leadership on athletes in detail, with findings applied in practice for the development of coaches.

摘要

本研究旨在开发一种有效且可靠的量表,用于衡量不同背景下(日本和美国)的教练型仆人式领导。首先,在日本采用演绎法(即文献综述)和归纳法(即对103名教练和34名大学生进行调查)收集潜在项目,并通过10位专家的内容效度评估进行筛选。接下来,对来自日本的936名高中运动员进行了定量研究,以验证该量表的结构效度。最后,在美国的278名大学运动员中证明了该量表在美国背景下的适用性。分析得出了一个包含17个项目的六因素模型,用于评估教练型仆人式领导行为:(1)接纳;(2)共同愿景;(3)赋能;(4)奉献;(5)谦逊;(6)求其次。总之,本研究通过应用演绎法和归纳法开发了一种教练型仆人式领导量表,并认为其不仅适用于日本,也适用于美国。预计未来的研究将详细考察教练型仆人式领导对运动员的影响,并将研究结果应用于教练培养的实践中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7695/9169236/091a6b93840e/fspor-04-871495-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7695/9169236/091a6b93840e/fspor-04-871495-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7695/9169236/091a6b93840e/fspor-04-871495-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Coaching Servant Leadership: Scale Development and Validation.指导型仆人式领导:量表的开发与验证
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 May 18;4:871495. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.871495. eCollection 2022.
2
Development of the Chinese coaches' autonomy-supportive- coaching style scale.中国教练自主支持型教练风格量表的编制
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 22;15:1412240. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1412240. eCollection 2024.
3
The Servant Leadership Survey: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Measure.仆人式领导调查:一种多维测量方法的开发与验证
J Bus Psychol. 2011 Sep;26(3):249-267. doi: 10.1007/s10869-010-9194-1. Epub 2010 Sep 3.
4
Effects of coach extraversion and educational environment on transformational leadership and athlete outcomes: A moderated mediation model.教练的外向性和教育环境对变革型领导和运动员表现的影响:一个有调节的中介模型。
J Sports Sci. 2023 Sep;41(14):1383-1392. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2023.2273086. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
5
Coaching Efficacy, Player Perceptions of Coaches' Leadership Styles, and Team Performance in Premier League Soccer.教练效能、球员对教练领导风格的看法与英超足球的团队表现。
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2019 Mar;90(1):71-79. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2018.1563277. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
6
Efficacy Sources that Predict Leadership Behaviors in Coaches of Athletes with Disabilities.预测残疾运动员教练领导行为的效能来源
J Hum Kinet. 2021 Mar 31;78:271-281. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2021-0056. eCollection 2021 Mar.
7
Systematic review and meta-analysis of Chinese coach leadership and athlete satisfaction and cohesion.中国教练领导力与运动员满意度及凝聚力的系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 25;15:1385178. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1385178. eCollection 2024.
8
Introducing a Short Measure of Shared Servant Leadership Impacting Team Performance through Team Behavioral Integration.介绍一种通过团队行为整合来衡量共享仆人式领导对团队绩效影响的简短方法。
Front Psychol. 2016 Jan 7;6:2002. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02002. eCollection 2015.
9
Servant leadership and performance of public hospitals: Trust in the leader and psychological empowerment of nurses.仆人式领导和公立医院绩效:对领导的信任和护士心理授权。
J Nurs Manag. 2022 Jul;30(5):1206-1214. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13622. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
10
Leadership Preferences of Adolescent Players in Sport: Influence of Coach Gender.青少年运动员在体育运动中的领导偏好:教练性别的影响
J Sports Sci Med. 2017 Jun 1;16(2):172-179. eCollection 2017 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
A cross-level moderating effect of team trust on the relationship between transformational leadership and cohesion.团队信任对变革型领导与凝聚力关系的跨层次调节作用。
J Sports Sci. 2019 Dec;37(24):2844-2852. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1668186. Epub 2019 Sep 21.
2
Transformational leadership and task cohesion in sport: the mediating role of inside sacrifice.体育运动中的变革型领导与任务凝聚力:内部牺牲的中介作用。
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2015 Feb;37(1):23-36. doi: 10.1123/jsep.2014-0116.
3
The Servant Leadership Survey: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Measure.
仆人式领导调查:一种多维测量方法的开发与验证
J Bus Psychol. 2011 Sep;26(3):249-267. doi: 10.1007/s10869-010-9194-1. Epub 2010 Sep 3.
4
Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist.系统评价研究测量特性的方法学质量评估:COSMIN 清单的评分系统。
Qual Life Res. 2012 May;21(4):651-7. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9960-1. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
5
The role of athlete narcissism in moderating the relationship between coaches' transformational leader behaviors and athlete motivation.运动员自恋在调节教练的变革型领导行为与运动员动机之间关系中的作用。
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2011 Feb;33(1):3-19. doi: 10.1123/jsep.33.1.3.
6
Coaching competency and satisfaction with the coach: a multi-level structural equation model.教练能力和对教练的满意度:多层次结构方程模型。
J Sports Sci. 2011 Feb;29(4):411-22. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2010.538710.
7
Selection and use of content experts for instrument development.为工具开发选择和使用内容专家。
Res Nurs Health. 1997 Jun;20(3):269-74. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-240x(199706)20:3<269::aid-nur9>3.0.co;2-g.