Suppr超能文献

青藏高原腹地人类与藏棕熊( )冲突的缓解策略

Mitigation Strategies for Human-Tibetan Brown Bear () Conflicts in the Hinterland of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.

作者信息

Dai Yunchuan, Li Yi, Xue Yadong, Hacker Charlotte E, Li Chunyan, Zahoor Babar, Liu Yang, Li Diqiang, Li Dayong

机构信息

Institute for Ecology and Environmental Resources, Chongqing Academy of Social Sciences, Chongqing 400020, China.

Research Center for Ecological Security and Green Development, Chongqing Academy of Social Sciences, Chongqing 400020, China.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2022 May 31;12(11):1422. doi: 10.3390/ani12111422.

Abstract

Personal injury and property damage caused by wildlife can worsen the relationship between humans and wildlife. In recent years, conflicts between herders and Tibetan brown bears () (human-bear conflicts; HBCs) on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau have increased dramatically, severely affecting community motivation for the conservation of brown bears and other species. Understanding the types, effectiveness, and flaws of current HBC mitigation measures is critical to develop effective strategies to alleviate HBC. From 2017 to 2019, we conducted a systematic field survey regarding HBCs on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. In addition, we invited bear specialists and multiple interest groups to hold an HBC seminar and proposed some potential mitigation strategies. We surveyed 312 families via semi-structured interviews and documented 16 types of HBC mitigation measures. A total of 96% of respondents were using more than two mitigation measures simultaneously. The effectiveness evaluation of HBC mitigation measures showed that: (1) removing food from winter homes while herders were at their summer pastures and asking people to keep watch of winter homes were effective at protecting food and houses; (2) traditional grazing methods (human guarding of livestock all day) and solar soundboxes (attached to livestock) were effective at protecting free-range livestock; (3) solar street lights had a deterrent effect on brown bears and were effective in protecting livestock, houses, and people; and (4) due to the unstable power supply of photovoltaic cells and improper installation of ground wires, electric fences were not ideal in practice. Evaluation of the potential mitigation measures at the seminar showed that upgrading electric fence technology, expanding electric fence pilot areas, installing diversionary feeders, and introducing bear spray were the most optimal solutions. This study provides a scientific basis for creating human-bear coexistence plans on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.

摘要

野生动物造成的人身伤害和财产损失会加剧人类与野生动物之间的关系恶化。近年来,青藏高原上牧民与藏棕熊之间的冲突(人熊冲突;HBCs)急剧增加,严重影响了社区保护棕熊和其他物种的积极性。了解当前缓解人熊冲突措施的类型、有效性和缺陷,对于制定有效的缓解策略至关重要。2017年至2019年,我们在青藏高原开展了关于人熊冲突的系统实地调查。此外,我们邀请了熊类专家和多个利益相关团体举办了一次人熊冲突研讨会,并提出了一些潜在的缓解策略。我们通过半结构化访谈对312户家庭进行了调查,并记录了16种缓解人熊冲突的措施。共有96%的受访者同时使用了两种以上的缓解措施。人熊冲突缓解措施的有效性评估表明:(1)在牧民前往夏季牧场时,从冬季住所移除食物,并要求人们看守冬季住所,对保护食物和房屋有效;(2)传统放牧方式(全天人工看守牲畜)和太阳能音箱(安装在牲畜身上)对保护放养牲畜有效;(3)太阳能路灯对棕熊有威慑作用,对保护牲畜、房屋和人员有效;(④)由于光伏电池供电不稳定和地线安装不当,电围栏在实际应用中并不理想。研讨会上对潜在缓解措施的评估表明,升级电围栏技术、扩大电围栏试验区、安装诱食器和引入熊喷雾是最优化的解决方案。本研究为制定青藏高原人熊共存计划提供了科学依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2852/9179409/a1f1ff2ac9fb/animals-12-01422-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验