Suppr超能文献

探索和监测年轻人获得性与生殖健康服务过程中的隐私、保密性和提供者偏见:叙事性综述。

Exploring and Monitoring Privacy, Confidentiality, and Provider Bias in Sexual and Reproductive Health Service Provision to Young People: A Narrative Review.

机构信息

Metrics for Management, 12 West Madison St., Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 27;19(11):6576. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116576.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Poor privacy and confidentiality practices and provider bias are believed to compromise adolescent and young adult sexual and reproductive health service quality. The results of focus group discussions with global youth leaders and sexual and reproductive health implementing organizations indicated that poor privacy and confidentiality practices and provider bias serve as key barriers to care access for the youth.

METHODS

A narrative review was conducted to describe how poor privacy and confidentiality practices and provider bias impose barriers on young people seeking sexual and reproductive health services and to examine how point of service evaluations have assessed these factors.

RESULTS

4544 peer-reviewed publications were screened, of which 95 met the inclusion criteria. To these articles, another 16 grey literature documents were included, resulting in a total of 111 documents included in the review.

CONCLUSION

Poor privacy and confidentiality practices and provider bias represent significant barriers for young people seeking sexual and reproductive health services across diverse geographic and sociocultural contexts. The authors found that present evaluation methods do not appropriately account for the importance of these factors and that new performance improvement indicators are needed.

摘要

目的

隐私和保密性差以及提供者偏见被认为会损害青少年和年轻成年人的性健康和生殖健康服务质量。与全球青年领袖和性健康与生殖健康实施组织进行的焦点小组讨论的结果表明,隐私和保密性差以及提供者偏见是阻碍年轻人获得医疗服务的主要障碍。

方法

进行了叙述性审查,以描述隐私和保密性差以及提供者偏见如何对寻求性健康和生殖健康服务的年轻人造成障碍,并研究了服务点评估如何评估这些因素。

结果

筛选了 4544 篇同行评议出版物,其中 95 篇符合纳入标准。将另外 16 篇灰色文献文件纳入其中,总共纳入了 111 篇文献进行综述。

结论

隐私和保密性差以及提供者偏见代表了年轻人在不同地理和社会文化背景下寻求性健康和生殖健康服务的重大障碍。作者发现,目前的评估方法没有适当考虑这些因素的重要性,需要新的绩效改进指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50d0/9180733/f5f1a8e3e7d6/ijerph-19-06576-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验