Department of Sport and Sport Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Engler-Bunte-Ring 15, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Department of Sport Pedagogy, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Kaiserstraße 12, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 3;19(11):6855. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116855.
High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) promises high training effects on aerobic fitness in children, adolescents and adults in a relatively short time. It is therefore well-established in professional training settings. HIIT methods could also be suited to Physical Education (P.E.) lessons and contribute to students’ health and fitness. Since HIIT sessions need little time and equipment, they can be efficiently implemented in P.E. However, there are few studies which have examined non-running-based HIIT programs in the school sport setting. We therefore conducted an intervention study including 121 students aged 11−15 attending a secondary school in Baden Württemberg, Germany. The effects of three different forms of HIIT training varying in duration and content (4 × 4 HIIT, 12 × 1 HIIT, CIRCUIT) were analyzed. The training was conducted twice a week over 6 weeks (10−12 sessions). Strength and endurance performances were determined in pre- and posttests prior to and after the intervention. Results verified that all three HIIT programs led to significant improvements in aerobic fitness (p < 0.001; part ŋ2 = 0.549) with no significant interaction between time x group. In contrast to the running-based HIIT sessions, CIRCUIT training also led to significant improvements in all of the measured strength parameters. Retrospectively, students were asked to assess their perception of the training intervention. The HIIT sessions were well-suited to students who considered themselves as “athletic”. Less athletic students found it difficult to reach the necessary intensity levels. The evaluation showed that endurance training conducted in P.E. lessons needs a variety of different contents in order to sufficiently motivate students. Students perceiving themselves as “unathletic” may need additional support to reach the required intensities of HIIT. Circuit training sessions using whole-body drills can be efficiently implemented in the P.E. setting and contribute to students’ health and fitness.
高强度间歇训练(HIIT)有望在相对较短的时间内提高儿童、青少年和成年人的有氧健身效果。因此,它在专业训练环境中得到了很好的应用。HIIT 方法也可能适合体育教育(PE)课程,有助于学生的健康和健身。由于 HIIT 课程所需的时间和设备很少,因此可以在 PE 中有效地实施。然而,很少有研究在学校体育环境中检查非跑步的 HIIT 项目。因此,我们在德国巴登-符腾堡州的一所中学进行了一项包括 121 名 11-15 岁学生的干预研究。分析了三种不同形式的 HIIT 训练,这些训练在持续时间和内容上有所不同(4×4 HIIT、12×1 HIIT、CIRCUIT)。训练在 6 周内每周进行两次(10-12 次)。在干预前后的前测和后测中,测定了力量和耐力表现。结果验证了所有三种 HIIT 方案都能显著提高有氧健身水平(p<0.001;部分ŋ2=0.549),时间与组之间没有显著的交互作用。与基于跑步的 HIIT 课程不同,CIRCUIT 训练还显著提高了所有测量的力量参数。回顾性地,学生被要求评估他们对训练干预的看法。HIIT 课程适合那些自认为是“运动型”的学生。运动能力较弱的学生发现很难达到必要的强度水平。评估表明,在体育课上进行的耐力训练需要多种不同的内容,以充分激发学生的兴趣。那些自认为不擅长运动的学生可能需要额外的支持来达到 HIIT 的要求强度。使用全身训练的 CIRCUIT 训练课程可以在体育课中有效地实施,并有助于学生的健康和健身。