School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.
Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation (MCHRI), School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 1/43-51 Kanooka Grove, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia.
Nutrients. 2022 May 30;14(11):2295. doi: 10.3390/nu14112295.
Background: Nutrient supplements are widely used for type 2 diabetes (T2D), yet evidence-based guidance for clinicians is lacking. Methods: We searched the four electronic databases from November 2015−December 2021. The most recent, most comprehensive, high-ranked systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and/or umbrella reviews of randomised controlled trials in adults with T2D were included. Data were extracted on study characteristics, aggregate outcome measures per group (glycaemic control, measures of insulin sensitivity and secretion), adverse events, and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) assessments. Quality was assessed using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews Version 2.0 (AMSTAR 2). Results: Twelve meta-analyses and one umbrella review were included. There was very low certainty evidence that chromium, Vitamin C, and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (Ω-3 PUFAs) were superior to placebo for the primary outcome of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (Mean Difference/MD −0.54, −0.54 and ES −0.27, respectively). Probiotics were superior to placebo for HbA1c (Weighted Mean Difference/WMD −0.43%). There was very low certainty evidence that Vitamin D was superior to placebo for lowering HbA1c in trials of <6 months (MD −0.17%). Magnesium, zinc, Vitamin C, probiotics, and polyphenols were superior to placebo for FBG. Vitamin D was superior to placebo for insulin resistance. Data on safety was limited. Conclusions: Future research should identify who may benefit from nutrient supplementation, safety, and optimal regimens and formulations.
营养素补充剂广泛用于 2 型糖尿病(T2D),但临床医生缺乏循证指导。方法:我们从 2015 年 11 月至 2021 年 12 月检索了四个电子数据库。纳入了最新、最全面、级别最高的关于 T2D 成人的随机对照试验的系统评价、荟萃分析和/或伞状评价。提取研究特征、每组的汇总结局指标(血糖控制、胰岛素敏感性和分泌的测量)、不良事件以及推荐评估、制定与评估分级(GRADE)评估的数据。使用评估系统评价的测量工具(AMSTAR 2)评估质量。结果:纳入了 12 项荟萃分析和 1 项伞状评价。有非常低的证据表明,铬、维生素 C 和欧米伽-3 多不饱和脂肪酸(Ω-3 PUFAs)在糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的主要结局方面优于安慰剂(平均差值/MD-0.54、-0.54 和 ES-0.27)。益生菌在 HbA1c 方面优于安慰剂(加权均数差/WMD-0.43%)。有非常低的证据表明,在 <6 个月的试验中,维生素 D 降低 HbA1c 优于安慰剂(MD-0.17%)。镁、锌、维生素 C、益生菌和多酚在 FBG 方面优于安慰剂。维生素 D 在胰岛素抵抗方面优于安慰剂。关于安全性的数据有限。结论:未来的研究应确定谁可能受益于营养补充剂、安全性以及最佳方案和配方。