Khan Mustafa T, Patnaik Ronit, Wheeler Cassidy, Ibrahim Mira, Wolf Haley, Baumgardner Kyle C, Lovely Rehana S
General Surgery, University of Texas (UT) Health San Antonio, San Antonio, USA.
Texas College of Osteopathic Medicine, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, USA.
Cureus. 2022 May 6;14(5):e24791. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24791. eCollection 2022 May.
Discrepancy between osteopathic (DO) and allopathic (MD) graduates in general surgery spans across all levels of training. In this cross-sectional study, we characterized DO surgeons who serve as faculty at university-based general surgery departments.
Overall, 106 university-based surgery departments were reviewed. DO and MD surgeons from the same institutions were identified, and demographic data were tabulated. MD surgeons were the control group. Univariate analysis and multivariate regression models were used to compare total publications, h-index, and citations.
A total of 70 DO surgeons from 34 institutions were identified: 53 assistant professors, 16 associate professors, and one full professor. Of the DO surgeons, 35.7% completed residency at a university-based program, and 92.9% completed a fellowship, with surgical critical care and trauma being the most common. They were compared to 1,307 MD surgeons from the same institutions. Univariate analysis showed that MD faculty graduated medical school earlier (mean years (standard deviation (SD)): 14.8 (6.0) versus 23.3 (10.6); p<0.0001), had more total publications (median (interquartile range (IQR)): 5 (2.0-18.3) versus 35 (15.0-79.0); p<0.0001), had higher number of citations (median (IQR): 61.0 (14.0-265.0) versus 655.0 (155.0-2267.0); p<0.001), and had a higher h-index (median (IQR): 3 (1.0-8.0) versus 12 (6.0-24.0); p<0.001). Negative binomial regression models accounting for years since graduation, gender, and degree were performed. At the assistant professor rank, MD surgeons had more total publications (exponential coefficient (CI): 2.24 (1.67-3.02); p<0.001), more citations (3.10 (2.20-4.11); p<0.001), and a higher h-index (1.93 (1.36-2.73); p<0.001). Similar trends were noted at the associate professor level with MD surgeons having more total publication (1.67 (1.00-2.79); p=0.049), more citations (3.63 (2.13-6.18); p<0.001), and higher h-index (1.93 (1.10-3.39); p=0.022).
To address this discrepancy between DO and MD faculty surgeons, action must begin at the medical school and continue through residency. DO trainees need better access to mentorship and research support to foster an academic career.
整骨疗法(DO)毕业生与全科医学(MD)毕业生在普通外科培训各阶段均存在差异。在这项横断面研究中,我们对在大学普通外科担任教员的整骨疗法外科医生进行了特征描述。
总共对106个大学外科科室进行了评估。确定了来自同一机构的整骨疗法和全科医学外科医生,并将人口统计学数据制成表格。全科医学外科医生作为对照组。采用单因素分析和多变量回归模型比较总发表量、h指数和引用次数。
共确定了来自34个机构的70名整骨疗法外科医生:53名助理教授、16名副教授和1名正教授。在整骨疗法外科医生中,35.7%在大学项目完成住院医师培训,92.9%完成了专科培训,其中外科重症监护和创伤是最常见的培训方向。将他们与来自同一机构的1307名全科医学外科医生进行了比较。单因素分析显示,全科医学教员毕业时间更早(平均年份(标准差):14.8(6.0)对23.3(10.6);p<0.0001),总发表量更多(中位数(四分位间距):5(2.0 - 18.3)对35(15.0 - 79.0);p<0.0001),引用次数更多(中位数(四分位间距):61.0(14.0 - 265.0)对655.0(155.0 - 2267.0);p<0.001),h指数更高(中位数(四分位间距):3(1.0 - 8.0)对12(6.0 - 24.0);p<0.001)。进行了考虑毕业年限、性别和学位的负二项回归模型分析。在助理教授级别,全科医学外科医生有更多的总发表量(指数系数(置信区间):2.24(1.67 - 3.02);p<0.001)、更多的引用次数(3.10(2.20 - 4.11);p<0.001)和更高的h指数(1.93(1.36 - 2.73);p<0.001)。在副教授级别也观察到类似趋势,全科医学外科医生有更多的总发表量(1.67(1.00 - 2.79);p = 0.049)、更多的引用次数(3.63(2.13 - 6.18);p<0.001)和更高的h指数(1.93(1.10 - 3.39);p = 0.022)。
为解决整骨疗法和全科医学教员外科医生之间的这种差异,必须从医学院开始并贯穿住院医师培训阶段采取行动。整骨疗法学员需要更好地获得指导和研究支持以促进学术生涯发展。