Department of Psychology, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, 3333 Green Bay Rd., North Chicago, IL, 60064, USA.
Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Jul;51(5):2535-2547. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02337-0. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
Bisexual men are at increased risk for HIV compared to heterosexual men but unlikely to use pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Given that biases may influence whether bisexual men are prescribed PrEP, we examined whether medical students' decision-making was influenced by the genders of a bisexual male patient's partners. Medical students (N = 718) were randomized to one of nine conditions where they answered questions about a bisexual male patient after reviewing his electronic medical record. We manipulated the gender of his current partner (none, male, female) and the genders of his past partners (male, female, both). Current partners were described as living with HIV and not yet virally suppressed, past partners were described as being of unknown HIV-status, and condom use was described as intermittent with all partners. When the patient was not in a current relationship, perceived HIV risk and likelihood of prescribing PrEP were lowest if he only had female partners in the past. When he was in a current relationship, perceived HIV risk and likelihood of prescribing PrEP did not differ based on current or past partners' genders. In addition, identification as a PrEP candidate, perceived likelihood of adherence, and perceived likelihood of engaging in condomless sex if prescribed were lower when the patient was not in a current relationship. Medical students appropriately prioritized the status of the partner living with HIV, but their decision-making was influenced by past partner genders when the patient was not in a current relationship. Medical students may require additional education to ensure they understand PrEP eligibility criteria and make decisions based on patients' individual presentations.
双性恋男性感染 HIV 的风险高于异性恋男性,但不太可能使用暴露前预防(PrEP)。鉴于偏见可能会影响双性恋男性是否被开处 PrEP,我们研究了医学生的决策是否受到双性恋男性患者伴侣性别的影响。将医学生(N=718)随机分配到九种情况中的一种,他们在查看电子病历后回答有关一名双性恋男性患者的问题。我们操纵了他当前伴侣的性别(无、男、女)和他过去伴侣的性别(男、女、两者都有)。当前伴侣被描述为患有 HIV 且尚未病毒抑制,过去伴侣被描述为 HIV 状况未知,并且与所有伴侣的性行为均被描述为间歇性使用安全套。当患者没有当前关系时,如果他过去只有女性伴侣,则认为 HIV 风险和开处 PrEP 的可能性最低。当他处于当前关系中时,基于当前或过去伴侣的性别,对 HIV 风险和开处 PrEP 的可能性没有差异。此外,当患者没有当前关系时,认为自己是 PrEP 候选者、认为自己遵医嘱的可能性、以及如果开处 PrEP 自己进行无保护性行为的可能性降低。医学生适当优先考虑与 HIV 一起生活的伴侣的状况,但当患者没有当前关系时,他们的决策会受到过去伴侣性别的影响。医学生可能需要接受更多的教育,以确保他们了解 PrEP 的资格标准,并根据患者的个体表现做出决策。