VA Connecticut Healthcare System, 950 Campbell Avenue, West Haven, CT, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Psychiatr Q. 2022 Sep;93(3):753-774. doi: 10.1007/s11126-022-09990-7. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
This study assessed mental health provider attitudes and perceptions of telemental health (TMH) prior to and during the COVID-19 Pandemic. The study expands on earlier work by providing a more detailed qualitative analysis of provider perceptions of TMH, including its efficacy, advantages, and limitations. The current study is part of a larger mixed methods project utilizing a repeated cross-sectional design. An online survey was administered to a sample of 1,448 mental health providers. Of the survey participants, 934 offered narrative responses to open-ended questions and were included in the present study. Qualitative data was analyzed using a coding team and the Consensual Qualitative Research paradigm. Providers described both positive and negative feelings about using TMH during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Several advantages were identified, with providers clearly appreciating the role of TMH in allowing them to work continuously and safely during the public health emergency. An array of negative views and concerns were also expressed, including that TMH may not be optimal or effective in certain settings or situations. A portion of respondents also indicated a preference for face-to-face care and illuminated ways they found TMH lacking or limited.
这项研究评估了心理健康服务提供者在 COVID-19 大流行之前和期间对远程心理健康 (TMH) 的态度和看法。该研究扩展了早期的工作,提供了对 TMH 的看法的更详细的定性分析,包括其疗效、优势和局限性。本研究是利用重复横断面设计的更大混合方法项目的一部分。一项在线调查针对 1448 名心理健康服务提供者进行了抽样调查。在调查参与者中,有 934 人对开放式问题提供了叙述性回答,并被纳入本研究。使用编码团队和共识定性研究范式对定性数据进行了分析。提供者描述了在 COVID-19 大流行期间使用 TMH 的积极和消极感受。确定了几个优势,提供者明确赞赏 TMH 在公共卫生紧急情况下允许他们持续和安全工作的作用。还表达了一系列负面的观点和担忧,包括 TMH 在某些环境或情况下可能不是最佳或有效的。一部分受访者还表示更喜欢面对面的护理,并阐明了他们发现 TMH 缺乏或有限的方式。