• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孟德尔第一定律:党派利益与基因议会。

Mendel's First Law: partisan interests and the parliament of genes.

机构信息

Center for Population Biology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.

Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.

出版信息

Heredity (Edinb). 2022 Jul;129(1):48-55. doi: 10.1038/s41437-022-00545-x. Epub 2022 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1038/s41437-022-00545-x
PMID:35690638
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9273594/
Abstract

Mendel's First Law requires explanation because of the possibility of 'meiotic drivers', genes that distort fair segregation for selfish gain. The suppression of drive, and the restoration of fair segregation, is often attributed to genes at loci unlinked to the drive locus-such genes cannot benefit from drive but do suffer its associated fitness costs. However, selection can also favour suppressors at loci linked to the drive locus, raising the question of whether suppression of drive usually comes from linked or unlinked loci. Here, I study linked and unlinked suppression in a two-locus model with initial stable polymorphism at the drive locus. I find that the invasion rate of suppressors is a decreasing function of the recombination fraction between the drive and suppressor loci. Surprisingly, the relative likelihood of unlinked vs. linked suppression increases with the strength of drive and is insensitive to the fitness costs of the driver allele. I find that the chromosomal position of the driver influences how rapidly it is suppressed, with a driver in the middle of a chromosome suppressed more rapidly than a driver near the tip. When drive is strong, only a small number of chromosomes are required for suppression usually to derive from unlinked loci. In contrast, when drive is weak, and especially when suppressor alleles are associated with fitness costs, suppression will usually come from linked loci unless the genome comprises many chromosomes.

摘要

孟德尔第一定律需要解释,因为存在“减数分裂驱动基因”的可能性,这些基因为了自身利益而扭曲公平分离。驱动的抑制和公平分离的恢复通常归因于与驱动基因座不连锁的基因座上的基因——这些基因不能从驱动中受益,但会遭受其相关的适应度成本。然而,选择也可以有利于与驱动基因座连锁的抑制基因座上的抑制基因,这就提出了一个问题,即驱动的抑制通常是来自连锁还是非连锁基因座。在这里,我在一个具有初始驱动基因座稳定多态性的双基因座模型中研究了连锁和非连锁抑制。我发现,抑制基因的入侵率是驱动和抑制基因座之间重组分数的递减函数。令人惊讶的是,非连锁与连锁抑制的相对可能性随着驱动强度的增加而增加,并且不依赖于驱动等位基因的适应度成本。我发现,驱动基因的染色体位置影响其被抑制的速度,位于染色体中间的驱动基因比位于染色体末端的驱动基因被抑制得更快。当驱动很强时,通常只需要少量的染色体就可以抑制驱动,通常来自非连锁基因座。相比之下,当驱动较弱时,尤其是当抑制等位基因与适应度成本相关时,抑制通常来自连锁基因座,除非基因组包含许多染色体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edda/9273594/d8aa63c86079/41437_2022_545_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edda/9273594/b23acf5eccd7/41437_2022_545_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edda/9273594/179756f716c5/41437_2022_545_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edda/9273594/d8aa63c86079/41437_2022_545_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edda/9273594/b23acf5eccd7/41437_2022_545_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edda/9273594/179756f716c5/41437_2022_545_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edda/9273594/d8aa63c86079/41437_2022_545_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Mendel's First Law: partisan interests and the parliament of genes.孟德尔第一定律:党派利益与基因议会。
Heredity (Edinb). 2022 Jul;129(1):48-55. doi: 10.1038/s41437-022-00545-x. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
2
Genetic Villains: Killer Meiotic Drivers.遗传恶棍:有丝分裂杀手驱动。
Trends Genet. 2018 Jun;34(6):424-433. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
3
Meiotic drive influences the outcome of sexually antagonistic selection at a linked locus.减数分裂驱动影响连锁基因座上性对抗性选择的结果。
J Evol Biol. 2014 Nov;27(11):2360-70. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12493. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
4
A method for low-coverage single-gamete sequence analysis demonstrates adherence to Mendel's first law across a large sample of human sperm.一种低覆盖度单配子序列分析方法在大量人类精子样本中证明了符合孟德尔第一定律。
Elife. 2022 Dec 7;11:e76383. doi: 10.7554/eLife.76383.
5
An egg sabotaging mechanism drives non-Mendelian transmission in mice.一种卵子破坏机制驱动小鼠中的非孟德尔遗传传递。
bioRxiv. 2024 Feb 23:2024.02.22.581453. doi: 10.1101/2024.02.22.581453.
6
Unselfish meiotic drive maintains heterozygosity in a parthenogenetic ant.无私的减数分裂驱动维持了孤雌生殖蚂蚁的杂合性。
bioRxiv. 2024 Feb 12:2024.02.09.579553. doi: 10.1101/2024.02.09.579553.
7
The fate of a suppressed X-linked meiotic driver: experimental evolution in Drosophila simulans.被抑制的 X 连锁减数分裂驱动因子的命运:果蝇 simulans 的实验进化。
Chromosome Res. 2022 Sep;30(2-3):141-150. doi: 10.1007/s10577-022-09698-1. Epub 2022 May 30.
8
Haploid Selection Favors Suppressed Recombination Between Sex Chromosomes Despite Causing Biased Sex Ratios.单体型选择有利于抑制性染色体之间的重组,尽管这会导致偏性性别比。
Genetics. 2017 Dec;207(4):1631-1649. doi: 10.1534/genetics.117.300062. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
9
Testing a candidate meiotic drive locus identified by pool sequencing.通过池测序测试一个候选减数分裂驱动基因座。
G3 (Bethesda). 2023 Nov 1;13(11). doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkad225.
10
Co-inheritance of recombined chromatids maintains heterozygosity in a parthenogenetic ant.重组染色单体的共同遗传维持了孤雌生殖蚂蚁的杂合性。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2024 Aug;8(8):1522-1533. doi: 10.1038/s41559-024-02455-z. Epub 2024 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
New perspectives on the causes and consequences of male meiotic drive.关于雄性减数分裂驱动的原因和后果的新观点。
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2023 Dec;83:102111. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2023.102111. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
2
Meiotic drive of noncentromeric loci in mammalian meiosis II eggs.哺乳动物减数分裂 II 期卵子中非着丝粒基因座的减数分裂驱动。
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2023 Aug;81:102082. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2023.102082. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
3
The meiotic driver gene family has unexpectedly persisted for over 100 million years.减数分裂驱动基因家族出人意料地存续了超过 1 亿年。

本文引用的文献

1
Some effects of variations in the segregation ratio and of selection on the frequency of alleles under random mating.随机交配下分离比变异和选择对基因频率的一些影响。
Acta Genet Stat Med. 1953;4(2-3):148-51.
Elife. 2022 Oct 13;11:e81149. doi: 10.7554/eLife.81149.