Jones Laney K, Strande Natasha T, Calvo Evan M, Chen Jingheng, Rodriguez Gabriela, McCormick Cara Z, Hallquist Miranda L G, Savatt Juliann M, Rocha Heather, Williams Marc S, Sturm Amy C, Buchanan Adam H, Glasgow Russell E, Martin Christa L, Rahm Alanna Kulchak
Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States.
Heart and Vascular Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States.
Front Genet. 2022 May 25;13:883073. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.883073. eCollection 2022.
DNA-based population screening has been proposed as a public health solution to identify individuals at risk for serious health conditions who otherwise may not present for medical care. The clinical utility and public health impact of DNA-based population screening is a subject of active investigation. Geisinger, an integrated healthcare delivery system, was one of the first healthcare systems to implement DNA screening programs (MyCode Community Health Initiative (MyCode) and clinical DNA screening pilot) that leverage exome data to identify individuals at risk for developing conditions with potential clinical actionability. Here, we demonstrate the use of an implementation science framework, RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance), to conduct a post-hoc evaluation and report outcomes from these two programs to inform the potential impact of DNA-based population screening. Reach and Effectiveness outcomes were determined from the MyCode research program, while Adoption and Implementation outcomes were measured using the clinical DNA screening pilot. Reach was defined as the number of patients who were offered and consented to participate in MyCode. Effectiveness of DNA screening was measured by reviewing MyCode program publications and synthesizing findings from themes. Adoption was measured by the total number of DNA screening tests ordered by clinicians at the clinical pilot sites. Implementation was assessed by interviewing a subset of clinical pilot clinicians about the deployment of and recommended adaptations to the pilot that could inform future program dissemination. : As of August 2020, 68% (215,078/316,612) of individuals approached to participate in the MyCode program consented. Effectiveness: Published evidence reported from MyCode demonstrates that DNA screening identifies at-risk individuals more comprehensively than clinical ascertainment based on phenotypes or personal/family history. : From July 2018 to June 2021, a total of 1,026 clinical DNA screening tests were ordered by 60 clinicians across the three pilot clinic sites. : Interviews with 14 clinicians practicing at the pilot clinic sites revealed motivation to provide patients with DNA screening results and yielded future implementation strategies. The RE-AIM framework offers a pragmatic solution to organize, analyze, and report outcomes across differently resourced and designed precision health programs that include genomic sequencing and return of clinically actionable genomic information.
基于DNA的人群筛查已被提议作为一种公共卫生解决方案,用于识别有严重健康问题风险的个体,否则这些个体可能不会寻求医疗护理。基于DNA的人群筛查的临床效用和公共卫生影响是一个正在积极研究的课题。Geisinger是一个综合医疗服务提供系统,是最早实施DNA筛查项目(MyCode社区健康倡议(MyCode)和临床DNA筛查试点)的医疗系统之一,这些项目利用外显子组数据来识别有发展成具有潜在临床可操作性疾病风险的个体。在此,我们展示了使用实施科学框架RE-AIM(覆盖范围、有效性、采用率、实施和维持)来进行事后评估,并报告这两个项目的结果,以了解基于DNA的人群筛查的潜在影响。覆盖范围和有效性结果来自MyCode研究项目,而采用率和实施结果则通过临床DNA筛查试点进行衡量。覆盖范围定义为被邀请并同意参与MyCode的患者数量。通过审查MyCode项目出版物并综合主题研究结果来衡量DNA筛查的有效性。采用率通过临床试点站点的临床医生所订购的DNA筛查测试总数来衡量。通过采访一部分临床试点医生,了解试点的部署情况以及对试点的推荐调整,这些调整可为未来项目的推广提供参考,以此来评估实施情况。截至2020年8月,被邀请参与MyCode项目的个体中有68%(215,078/316,612)同意参与。有效性:MyCode报告的已发表证据表明,与基于表型或个人/家族病史的临床确诊相比,DNA筛查能够更全面地识别有风险的个体。从2018年7月到2021年6月,三个试点诊所站点的60名临床医生共订购了1,026次临床DNA筛查测试。对在试点诊所站点执业的14名临床医生的访谈揭示了向患者提供DNA筛查结果的动机,并产生了未来的实施策略。RE-AIM框架为组织、分析和报告不同资源配置和设计的精准健康项目(包括基因组测序和返回具有临床可操作性的基因组信息)的结果提供了一个实用的解决方案。