Zhong Qiaonan, Kumar Ashish, Deshmukh Abhishek, Bennett Courtney
Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, NY, USA.
Department of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Akron General Hospital, Akron, OH, USA.
Cardiol Res Pract. 2022 Jun 1;2022:5158362. doi: 10.1155/2022/5158362. eCollection 2022.
To assess the antiarrhythmic properties of dexmedetomidine in patients in the intensive care unit.
A literature review was conducted with Ovid MEDLINE (R), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, and Scopus. . Randomized controlled trials were included, examining the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias, ventricular tachycardia, or ventricular fibrillation with dexmedetomidine compared to placebo or an alternative sedative agent. For each publication that met the selection criteria, the patient demographics, incidence of arrhythmias, mortality, and adverse events were collected. Data extraction was carried out by two authors independently.
We identified 6 out of 126 studies that met the selection criteria for our meta-analysis, all of which focused on the perioperative cardiac surgery period. Patients receiving dexmedetomidine demonstrated a significant reduction of the overall incidence of ventricular arrhythmias (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.16, 0.76). In particular, dexmedetomidine significantly decreased the risk of ventricular tachycardia compared with control (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08, 0.80, I 0%). Regarding adverse events, dexmedetomidine significantly increased the frequency of bradycardia (RR 2.78 95% CI 2.00, 3.87). However, there was no significant difference in mortality (RR 0.59 95% CI 0.12, 3.02).
From this meta-analysis, we report a decreased incidence of ventricular tachycardia with dexmedetomidine in critically ill patients. This result favors the use of dexmedetomidine for its antiarrhythmic properties.
评估右美托咪定在重症监护病房患者中的抗心律失常特性。
使用Ovid MEDLINE(R)、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库、Cochrane系统评价数据库、Embase和Scopus进行文献综述。纳入随机对照试验,比较右美托咪定与安慰剂或其他镇静剂相比,室性心律失常、室性心动过速或心室颤动的发生率。对于每项符合入选标准的出版物,收集患者人口统计学资料、心律失常发生率、死亡率和不良事件。由两位作者独立进行数据提取。
我们在126项研究中确定了6项符合我们荟萃分析的入选标准,所有这些研究都集中在围手术期心脏手术期间。接受右美托咪定的患者室性心律失常的总体发生率显著降低(RR 0.35,95%CI 0.16,0.76)。特别是,与对照组相比,右美托咪定显著降低了室性心动过速的风险(RR 0.25,95%CI 0.08,0.80,I² 0%)。关于不良事件,右美托咪定显著增加了心动过缓的发生率(RR 2.78,95%CI 2.00,3.87)。然而,死亡率没有显著差异(RR 0.59,95%CI 0.12,3.02)。
通过这项荟萃分析,我们报告了重症患者使用右美托咪定后室性心动过速的发生率降低。这一结果支持使用右美托咪定因其抗心律失常特性。