Fujimoto Shuhei, Ogawa Tatsuya, Komukai Kanako, Nakayama Takeo
Department of Graduate School of Public Health, Shizuoka Graduate University of Public Health: 4-27-2 Kita-ando, Aoi-ku, Shizuoka city, Shizuoka 420-0881, Japan.
Department of Health Informatics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Public Health, Japan.
J Phys Ther Sci. 2022 Jun;34(6):445-453. doi: 10.1589/jpts.34.445. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
[Purpose] This study aimed to investigate the influence of the evidence practice gap on physiotherapist and occupational therapists through shared decision making using the clinical practice guidelines. [Participants and Methods] A randomized controlled trial was used. The participants included 126 therapists from three institutions. The inclusion criteria was permanent employment in these institutions. Participants' characteristics were masked from the allocator, evaluator, and analyzer. For the intervention group, a workshop on shared decision making was conducted using clinical practice guidelines. Two control groups were set. One group received a lecture on the knowledge of clinical practice guidelines, and the other group received a lecture on the knowledge of shared decision making. The primary outcomes were "education, attitudes and beliefs, and interest and perceived role in evidence-based practice" scale. [Results] The primary outcomes showed a significant difference between the clinical practice guidelines with shared decision making group and the clinical practice guidelines group (mean ± standard deviation, pre/post; clinical practice guidelines with shared decision making group, 2.4 ± 0.9/4.4 ± 1.7; clinical practice guidelines group, 3.0 ± 1.5/3.5 ± 2.0; shared decision making group, 2.6 ± 1.2/ 3.3 ± 1.8). [Conclusion] Shared decision making education using the clinical practice guidelines improves evidence-based practice of self-efficacy in physiotherapists and occupational therapists.
[目的] 本研究旨在通过使用临床实践指南进行共同决策,探讨证据实践差距对物理治疗师和职业治疗师的影响。[参与者与方法] 采用随机对照试验。参与者包括来自三个机构的126名治疗师。纳入标准是在这些机构长期任职。分配者、评估者和分析者对参与者的特征进行了盲法处理。对于干预组,使用临床实践指南举办了一次关于共同决策的研讨会。设置了两个对照组。一组接受了关于临床实践指南知识的讲座,另一组接受了关于共同决策知识的讲座。主要结局指标是“教育、态度和信念以及在循证实践中的兴趣和感知角色”量表。[结果] 主要结局指标显示,共同决策的临床实践指南组与临床实践指南组之间存在显著差异(均值±标准差,干预前/后;共同决策的临床实践指南组,2.4±0.9/4.4±1.7;临床实践指南组,3.0±1.5/3.5±2.0;共同决策组,2.6±1.2/3.3±1.8)。[结论] 使用临床实践指南进行共同决策教育可提高物理治疗师和职业治疗师循证实践的自我效能。