Suppr超能文献

公众参与:教师的生活经历和观点突显了学术界的障碍和不断变化的文化。

Public engagement: Faculty lived experiences and perspectives underscore barriers and a changing culture in academia.

机构信息

Department of Life Sciences Communication, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.

Morgridge Institute for Research, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Jun 15;17(6):e0269949. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269949. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

The idea of faculty engaging in meaningful dialogue with different publics instead of simply communicating their research to interested audiences has gradually morphed from a novel concept to a mainstay within most parts of the academy. Given the wide variety of public engagement modalities, it may be unsurprising that we still lack a comprehensive and granular understanding of factors that influence faculty willingness to engage with public audiences. Those nuances are not always captured by quantitative surveys that rely on pre-determined categories to assess scholars' willingness to engage. While closed-ended categories are useful to examine which factors influence the willingness to engage more than others, it is unlikely that pre-determined categories comprehensively represent the range of factors that undermine or encourage engagement, including perceptual influences, institutional barriers, and scholars' lived experiences. To gain insight into these individual perspectives and lived experiences, we conducted focus group discussions with faculty members at a large midwestern land-grant university in the United States. Our findings provide context to previous studies of public engagement and suggest four themes for future research. These themes affirm the persistence of institutional barriers to engaging with the public, particularly the expectations in the promotion process for tenure-track faculty. However, we also find a perception that junior faculty and graduate students are challenging the status quo by introducing a new wave of attention to public engagement. This finding suggests a "trickle-up" effect through junior faculty and graduate students expecting institutional support for public engagement. Our findings highlight the need to consider how both top-down factors such as institutional expectations and bottom-up factors such as graduate student interest shape faculty members' decisions to participate in public engagement activities.

摘要

教师与不同公众进行有意义的对话,而不仅仅是将研究成果传达给感兴趣的受众,这种理念逐渐从一个新颖的概念演变为大多数学术界的主要内容。鉴于公众参与的方式多种多样,我们仍然缺乏对影响教师与公众受众互动意愿的因素的全面而细致的理解,这可能并不奇怪。这些细微差别并不总是被依赖于预先确定的类别来评估学者参与意愿的定量调查所捕捉到。虽然封闭类别对于检查哪些因素比其他因素更能影响参与意愿很有用,但预先确定的类别不太可能全面代表破坏或鼓励参与的因素范围,包括感知影响、制度障碍和学者的生活经历。为了深入了解这些个人观点和生活经历,我们与美国一所中西部赠地大学的教师进行了焦点小组讨论。我们的研究结果为公众参与的先前研究提供了背景,并为未来的研究提出了四个主题。这些主题肯定了与公众互动的制度障碍的持续存在,特别是对终身教职教师晋升过程中的期望。然而,我们也发现一种看法,即初级教师和研究生通过引入对公众参与的新关注,正在挑战现状。这一发现表明,通过初级教师和研究生期望获得机构对公众参与的支持,出现了一种“涓滴效应”。我们的研究结果强调了需要考虑机构期望等自上而下的因素以及研究生兴趣等自下而上的因素如何影响教师参与公众参与活动的决定。

相似文献

5
Developing a Novel 4-C Framework to Enhance Participation in Faculty Development.开发一个新的 4C 框架以提高教师发展的参与度。
Teach Learn Med. 2020 Aug-Sep;32(4):371-379. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1742124. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
7
The enduring pursuit of public science at U.S. land-grant universities.美国赠地大学对公共科学的持久追求。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 22;16(11):e0259997. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259997. eCollection 2021.
8
Exploring scholars' public engagement goals in Canada and the United States.探究加拿大和美国学者的公众参与目标。
Public Underst Sci. 2020 Nov;29(8):855-867. doi: 10.1177/0963662520950671. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
9
Mentoring for a new era.新时代的指导
Acad Med. 2002 Nov;77(11):1171-2. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200211000-00041.

本文引用的文献

2
What we know about effective public engagement on CRISPR and beyond.我们对 CRISPR 及其它相关技术的有效公众参与的了解。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jun 1;118(22). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2004835117. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
3
Exploring scholars' public engagement goals in Canada and the United States.探究加拿大和美国学者的公众参与目标。
Public Underst Sci. 2020 Nov;29(8):855-867. doi: 10.1177/0963662520950671. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
4
Scientists' incentives and attitudes toward public communication.科学家对公众传播的激励和态度。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jan 21;117(3):1274-1276. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1916740117. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
9
Scientists' Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement.科学家对公众参与沟通目标的优先排序。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 25;11(2):e0148867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148867. eCollection 2016.
10
Has Contemporary Academia Outgrown the Carl Sagan Effect?当代学术界是否已超越卡尔·萨根效应?
J Neurosci. 2016 Feb 17;36(7):2077-82. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0086-16.2016.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验